Jan-Werner Müller is Professor of Politics at Princeton University. He is author of several books, most recently Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Europe. He contributes regularly to London Review of Books, the Guardian, and the New York Review of Books.
Donald Trump, Silvio Berlusconi, Marine Le Pen, Hugo Chávez—populists are on the rise across the globe. But what exactly is populism? Should everyone who criticizes Wall Street or Washington be called a populist? What precisely is the difference between right-wing and left-wing populism? Does populism bring government closer to the people or is it a threat to democracy? Who are "the people" anyway and who can speak in their name? These questions have never been more pressing.
In this groundbreaking volume, Jan-Werner Müller argues that at populism's core is a rejection of pluralism. Populists will always claim that they and they alone represent the people and their true interests. Müller also shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, populists can govern on the basis of their claim to exclusive moral representation of the people: if populists have enough power, they will end up creating an authoritarian state that excludes all those not considered part of the proper "people." The book proposes a number of concrete strategies for how liberal democrats should best deal with populists and, in particular, how to counter their claims to speak exclusively for "the silent majority" or "the real people."
Analytical, accessible, and provocative, What Is Populism? is grounded in history and draws on examples from Latin America, Europe, and the United States to define the characteristics of populism and the deeper causes of its electoral successes in our time.
「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
评分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
评分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
评分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
评分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
民粹主义的核心在于反精英/反多元主义/宣称自己代表真正的人民
评分从几乎是纯政治哲学的角度展开的分析,还是蛮有道理的。
评分作为对民粹主义的入门书还是不错的,和Galston、Zakaria的文章一起读效果更好。
评分若想借此书来了解西方近年来民粹主义政治崛起的根源,那么此书并未提供答案,因为作者没有涉及到政治经济学分析。仅从政治哲学的进路来界定民粹主义,不免有点隔靴搔痒。
评分个人感觉Mueller的这本书在内容上较Mudde的一书稍有欠缺,但在政治理论层面要高Mudde的不少。更为明显的是,Mueller显著地具有更为消极的立场。 值得一提的是,Mueller去年来华讲座系列跟这本书的内容基本上重合,算是了结了去年听他的讲座想要写点东西的愿望(指读书报告)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有