Culture, Power, and the State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:Stanford University Press

作者:Prasenjit Duara

出品人:

页数:340

译者:

出版时间:1991-4-1

价格:USD 30.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780804718882

丛书系列:

图书标签:

海外中国研究
杜赞奇
历史
社会学
中国研究
文化
PrasenjitDuara
Duara
Culture
Power
State
Sociology
Politics
Influence
Governance
Identity
Power Dynamics

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

In the early twentieth century, the Chinese state made strenuous efforts to broaden and deepen its authority over rural society. This book is an ambitious attempt to offer both a method and a framework for analyzing Chinese social history in the state-making era.The author constructs a prismatic view of village-level society that shows how marketing, kinship, water control, temple patronage, and other structures of human interaction overlapped to form what he calls the cultural nexus of power in local society. The author's concept of the cultural nexus and his tracing of how it was altered enables us for the first time to grapple with change at the village level in all its complexity.The author asserts that the growth of the state transformed and delegitimized the traditional cultural nexus during the Republican era, particularly in the realm of village leadership and finances. Thus, the expansion of state power was ultimately and paradoxically responsible for the revolution in China as it eroded the foundations of village life, leaving nothing in its place.The problems of state-making in China were different from those of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Europe; the Chinese experience heralds the process that would become increasingly common in the emergent states of the developing world under the very different circumstances of the twentieth century.

作者简介

Prasenjit Duara is Director of the Asia Research Institute at National University of Singapore.

目录信息

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

本书充分利用“满铁”在华北地区的调查资料，重点研究了20世纪上半叶国家政权的扩张对华北乡村社会权力结构的影响，从历史和社会学的角度出发，利用“权力的文化网络”和“国家政权的内卷化”这两个核心概念对这一时期村庄领导层地位的变化进行深入的分析，旨在探讨中国国家政...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

文化的权力网络从研究方法上：首先说杜赞奇的研究方法及全书的研究思路：这本书中提出了两个中心概念，这两个中心概念因为我不了解当时或现在研究常用的研究术语和生态，因此，我感觉不到它的新意。但是，在书的序和后记部分，作者提到他用了两个概...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

该书充分利用满铁在华北地区的调查资料，利用“权力的文化网络”和“国家政权的内卷化”这两个概念对这一时期村庄领导层地位的变化进行深入的分析，旨在探讨中国国家政权与乡村社会之间的互动关系。20世纪初华北乡村社会中的政治权威体现在由组织和象征符号构成的文化网络之中，这一网络主要由宗族、市场等方面形成的等级组织，各种非人际关系网等构成。文化网络赋予了民众对乡村领袖领导地位和国家政权合法性的认可。然而现代化进程中的国家政权却抛弃了文化网络，企图建立全新的政治体系加强对基层社会的控制。国家政权的深入、文化网络的破坏和日益增加的苛捐杂税使得乡村精英开始退出乡村政治领导层，保护型经纪体制逐渐为赢利型经纪所取代。国家政权无法依靠提高旧有或新增机构的效益，而是靠复制旧有的经纪制来扩大行政职能，陷入了内卷化的困境

评分☆☆☆☆☆

史料详实机制细致。政治经济的清末、民初都好，但文化基本上只写到宗教了，现代化和意识形态的进入感觉写的不够味道。cultural nexus of power -- protective & entrepreneurial brokages -(modernization & fiscal pressure)- state involution

评分☆☆☆☆☆

难读

评分☆☆☆☆☆

it seems very trendy to criticize a model/paradigm focusing too much on “consistency” and neglecting “culture”…It seems we can modify everything by pointing out there are contested/negotiated symbols…

评分☆☆☆☆☆

福柯搭上布迪厄，还有点韦伯。好在还不算很讨厌。