1 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 I. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge 1.2 II. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions "a priori". 1.3 III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge "a priori" 1.4 IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judge-ments 1.5 V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements "a priori" are contained as Principles 1.6 VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason 1.7 VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason2 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF ELEMENTS. 2.1 FIRST PART. TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC SECTION I. Of Space SECTION II. Of Time 2.2 SECOND PART. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC INTRODUCTION. Idea of a Transcendental Logic I. Of Logic in General II. Of Transcendental Logic III. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. FIRST DIVISION BOOK I CHAPTER I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. CHAPTER II Of the Deduction of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding BOOK II. Analytic of Principles CHAPTER I. Of the Schematism at of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding CHAPTER II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding CHAPTER III. Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. SECOND DIVISION TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC. INTRODUCTION I. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance. II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance BOOK I. OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON SECTION I Of Ideas in General SECTION II. Of Transcendental Ideas SECTION III. System of Transcendental Ideas. BOOK II. OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PURE REASON CHAPTER I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason CHAPTER II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason. CHAPTER III. The Ideal of Pure Reason.3 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF METHOD. 3.1 CHAPTER I. The Discipline of Pure Reason 3.1.1 SECTION I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism 3.1.2 SECTION II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics 3.1.3 SECTION III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis 3.1.4 SECTION IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs 3.2 CHAPTER II. The Canon of Pure Reason 3.2.1 SECTION I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason 3.2.2 SECTION II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason 3.2.3 SECTION III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief 3.3 CHAPTER III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason 3.4 CHAPTER IV. The History of Pure Reason
· · · · · · (
收起)
評分
☆☆☆☆☆
岁月流逝,但有些阅读体验会在你的生命中留下不可磨灭的印记。 记得那时才十八九岁,刚进大学,在那满怀憧憬而又懵懂彷徨的青春岁月里,开始思考起人生的价值和方向。有三本书对自己今后的思想发展产生了深远的影响 —— 马克思的《1844年经济学哲学手稿》,席勒的《审美教育...
評分
☆☆☆☆☆
中译本序 p2 初版于1781年,再版于1787年。 正文 p18 于是我们就可以把一门单纯批判纯粹理性、它的来源和界限的科学视为纯粹理性体系的入门。这样一个入门将不必称作一种学理,而只应当叫做纯粹理性的批判,而它的用处就思辨方面来说实际上将只是否定性的,不是用来扩展我们...
評分
☆☆☆☆☆
国人研究康德,按贺麟先生的说法:“张铭鼎是我国20-30年代“最初搞康德哲学的人物”。张先生1924年在《学艺》杂志上发表了《康德学说的渊源与影响》,第二年又在《民铎》“康德专号”上发表了《康德批判哲学之形式说》,对康德哲学作了一个比较系统的介绍,他认为康德三大...
評分
☆☆☆☆☆
評分
☆☆☆☆☆
康德的哲学统治了整个十九世纪的思想,属于德国古典哲学开宗立派的人物。此线直接的后继者为费希特、谢林,至黑格尔达到顶峰。然而康德哲学的影响力远不止仅仅局限于德国古典哲学。哲学史上有个非常流行的说法:康德哲学是“蓄水池”。以前的哲学流向康德...