图书标签: 思想史 梁启超 唐小兵 海外中国研究 中国近代史 中国 社会研究 历史
发表于2024-11-07
Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
This book reexamines the historical thinking of Liang Qichao (1873-1929), one of the few modern Chinese thinkers and cultural critics whose appreciation of the question of modernity was based on first-hand experience of the world space in which China had to function as a nation-state. It seeks to demonstrate that Liang was not only a profoundly paradigmatic modern Chinese intellectual but also an imaginative thinker of worldwide significance. By tracing the changes in Liang's conception of history, the author shows that global space inspired both Liang's longing for modernity and his critical reconceptualization of modern history. Spatiality, or the mode of determining spatial organization and relationships, offers a new interpretive category for understanding the stages in Liang's historical thinking. Liang's historical thinking culminated in a global imaginary of difference, which became most evident in the shift from his earlier proposal for a uniform national history to one that mapped "cultural history". His reaffirmation of spatiality, a critical concept overshadowed by the modernist obsession with time and history, made it both necessary and possible for him to redesign the project of modernity. Finally, the author suggests that the reconciliation of anthropological space with historical time that Liang achieved makes him abundantly contemporary with our own time, both inextricably modern and postmodern.
Xiaobing Tang is Associate Professor of Chinese at the University of Chicago.
这本书是唐在博士论文的基础上写成的。博士时已具有这样宏大的视野而且搬动这么多复杂的概念,实在钦佩。文笔很好,不过有时候略觉重复啰嗦;有些章节(如第二章)没有在开头时明确立论,却得读者从后面的长段中梳理,也好在因为他敢于重复,所以没有读着读着迷了路的危险。第四章分析小说文本,大概也是因为文本是辩论的缘故,读得实在很累。唐本意在介绍梁怎样努力把中国的民族空间纳入世界的前进性历史中,却没有很好地点题,没说明文本中空间和时间的互动关系。有两个小地方忍不住吐槽:第156页和第160页都用了too...to...的表达,却都把意思用反了,那两个句子真是鹤立鸡群啊。
评分哲学部分不太能看懂,主要是知识储备不够,这样看来思想史真的很难写啊。
评分这本书是唐在博士论文的基础上写成的。博士时已具有这样宏大的视野而且搬动这么多复杂的概念,实在钦佩。文笔很好,不过有时候略觉重复啰嗦;有些章节(如第二章)没有在开头时明确立论,却得读者从后面的长段中梳理,也好在因为他敢于重复,所以没有读着读着迷了路的危险。第四章分析小说文本,大概也是因为文本是辩论的缘故,读得实在很累。唐本意在介绍梁怎样努力把中国的民族空间纳入世界的前进性历史中,却没有很好地点题,没说明文本中空间和时间的互动关系。有两个小地方忍不住吐槽:第156页和第160页都用了too...to...的表达,却都把意思用反了,那两个句子真是鹤立鸡群啊。
评分哲学部分不太能看懂,主要是知识储备不够,这样看来思想史真的很难写啊。
评分这本书是唐在博士论文的基础上写成的。博士时已具有这样宏大的视野而且搬动这么多复杂的概念,实在钦佩。文笔很好,不过有时候略觉重复啰嗦;有些章节(如第二章)没有在开头时明确立论,却得读者从后面的长段中梳理,也好在因为他敢于重复,所以没有读着读着迷了路的危险。第四章分析小说文本,大概也是因为文本是辩论的缘故,读得实在很累。唐本意在介绍梁怎样努力把中国的民族空间纳入世界的前进性历史中,却没有很好地点题,没说明文本中空间和时间的互动关系。有两个小地方忍不住吐槽:第156页和第160页都用了too...to...的表达,却都把意思用反了,那两个句子真是鹤立鸡群啊。
王玮 译 译者按:本文是汪荣祖对唐小兵著《全球空间与现代性的民族主义论述——梁启超历史思想论》(Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao)一书所作书评。该书由斯坦福大学出版社(Stanford University Press)...
评分王玮 译 译者按:本文是汪荣祖对唐小兵著《全球空间与现代性的民族主义论述——梁启超历史思想论》(Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao)一书所作书评。该书由斯坦福大学出版社(Stanford University Press)...
评分王玮 译 译者按:本文是汪荣祖对唐小兵著《全球空间与现代性的民族主义论述——梁启超历史思想论》(Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao)一书所作书评。该书由斯坦福大学出版社(Stanford University Press)...
评分王玮 译 译者按:本文是汪荣祖对唐小兵著《全球空间与现代性的民族主义论述——梁启超历史思想论》(Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao)一书所作书评。该书由斯坦福大学出版社(Stanford University Press)...
评分王玮 译 译者按:本文是汪荣祖对唐小兵著《全球空间与现代性的民族主义论述——梁启超历史思想论》(Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity: The Historical Thinking of Liang Qichao)一书所作书评。该书由斯坦福大学出版社(Stanford University Press)...
Global Space and the Nationalist Discourse of Modernity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024