From Philosophy to Philology pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Benjamin Elman (Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania, 1980) is Professor of East Asian Studies and History with his primary department in East Asian Studies. His teaching and research fields include: 1) Chinese intellectual and cultural history, 1000-1900; 2) history of science in China, 1600-1930; 3) history of education in late imperial China; 4) Sino-Japanese cultural history, 1600-1850. His publications include: From Philosophy To Philology (1984, 1990, 2001); Classicism, Politics, and Kinship (1990); A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (2000). He has recently completed two book projects: On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900 (2005), and A Cultural History of Modern Science in Late Imperial China (2006). A new work entitled Meritocracy and Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (HUP) is forthcoming in fall 2013. He is also currently editing several volumes from conferences held at Princeton under the auspices of PIIRS, EAP, and the Mellon Foundation on "Science in Republican China," "Languages, Literacies, and Vernaculars in Early Modern East Asia," and "Medical Classics and Medical Philology in East Asian, 1400-1900." During his leave in AY14, Elman will visit archives in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. His previous sabbatical leave in 2007-2008 was supported by a research fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.” Since then he has continued working on a new project entitled "The Intellectual Impact of Late Imperial Chinese Classicism, Medicine, and Science in Tokugawa Japan, 1700-1850," under the auspices of summer research grants from the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation in Taiwan and the Mellon Foundation.
- 思想史
- 海外中国研究
- Elman
- 历史
- 海外漢學
- 經學
- 社会史
- 清學
From Philosophy to Philology is an indispensable work on the intellectual life of China’s literati in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. While there was not a scientific revolution in China, there was an intellectual one. The shock of the Manchu conquest and the collapse of the Ming dynasty in 1644 led to a rejection of the moral self-cultivation that dominated intellectual life under the Ming. China’s scholars, particularly in the Yangzi River Basin, sought to restore China’s greatness by recapturing the wisdom of the ancients from the Warring States period (403–221 B.C.) and the Former Han dynasty (202 B.C.–9 A.D.), much as Renaissance Europe rediscovered the Greeks and Romans. But in China scholars faced the daunting task of determining which of many editions of the Classics were the true originals and which were forged additions of later centuries.
The ensuing search for authentic texts led to the founding of academies and libraries, the compiling of bibliographies, the rise of printing of editions of the Classics and Histories and commentaries on their components, the study of ancient inscriptions, and a two-hundred-year effort to discover and discard forged texts. In the process rigorous standards of scholarly training were adopted, and scholarship became a full-time profession distinct from gentry farmers or imperial officials.
具体描述
读后感
一直以来都对汉学家比较感兴趣，但是也限于自身读的他们的书比较少，所以一直未敢对之进行评析。这次借着读完从图书管里借来的艾尔曼的两本书（另一本是《经学、政治和宗族 : 中华帝国晚期常州今文学派研究》）的机会，也大体的说一下我对于汉学家的看法。 从他们研究...
评分2nd edition, 2001)---a preliminary note The keyword in the title “From Philosophy to Philology: intellectual and social aspects of change in late imperial China” is “change”. As the preface summarizes, “during the Qing dynasty a unified academic c...
评分这算是一本如雷贯耳的西方汉学著作了。它在讨论一个自时代的水平面上横切出来的用以纵观思想与社会变化诸面相的课题的时候，极鲜明地禀赋了汉学应有的全部优点和不足，用书中所讨论的汉学和宋学做个不恰当的比喻，可以说这本书在义理之学上占据了一个制高点的位置（比如运用了...
评分一直以来都对汉学家比较感兴趣，但是也限于自身读的他们的书比较少，所以一直未敢对之进行评析。这次借着读完从图书管里借来的艾尔曼的两本书（另一本是《经学、政治和宗族 : 中华帝国晚期常州今文学派研究》）的机会，也大体的说一下我对于汉学家的看法。 从他们研究...
评分这算是一本如雷贯耳的西方汉学著作了。它在讨论一个自时代的水平面上横切出来的用以纵观思想与社会变化诸面相的课题的时候，极鲜明地禀赋了汉学应有的全部优点和不足，用书中所讨论的汉学和宋学做个不恰当的比喻，可以说这本书在义理之学上占据了一个制高点的位置（比如运用了...
用户评价
清代尤其是18世紀學術轉變的內部動因及整個學術機制的變革。很必讀的作品，看完感覺很多繪畫史上的轉變都好理解多了。
评分知识社群学不止关注文本呈现范式方法转向和中西交互，更关注生产范式的知识社群形成（社会地位、经济背景）与联结形式（地方书院、图书出版、共同认定经典和当代著作等）。2001年新修版有个有趣角度：艾氏新修版序言谈到老版面临许多批评与误解，如理学朴学（或哲学与文字学）截然二分的不妥，英文词新儒学引发此词在17世纪（理学心学vs道学等）与20世纪（新亚书院的新儒学）意思的混淆并提出命名新方案（新儒学最好专指新亚一路），宗教vs教化对英语学者理解儒学与儒者群体的影响等，并大方承认当时英语圈儒学研究远逊日本，此似亦体现北美东亚研究作品潜藏前提：它们对话的知识社群首先是英语学者群，其次是当时被认为研究中国更透的学者群（如日本），最外反而是在地学者社群。艾氏自己对此认识清楚，也奇妙地与本书知识社群研究呼应。
评分从未想过魏源康有为等人与考证派千丝万缕的联系。抛开所有学术话语，只有一种感想，那时的人们想象这个世界的方式与今天是多么不同啊。而一旦进了窠臼，就难跳出了。
评分专业英语什么的……
评分精细，专业，大师。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有