Infectious Change pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

Katherine A. Mason is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Brown University.

出版者:Stanford University Press

作者:Katherine Mason

出品人:

页数:272

译者:

出版时间:2016-5-4

价格:USD 90.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780804794435

丛书系列:

图书标签:

人类学
公共卫生
医学人类学
社会学
中国
医学
海外中国研究
美国

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

承接住宅自建房室内改造装修设计免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

In February 2003, a Chinese physician crossed the border between mainland China and Hong Kong, spreading Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)—a novel flu-like virus—to over a dozen international hotel guests. SARS went on to kill about 800 people and sicken 8,000 worldwide. By July 2003 the disease had disappeared, but it left an indelible change on public health in China. The Chinese public health system, once famous for its grassroots, low-technology approach, was transformed into a globally-oriented, research-based, scientific endeavor.

In Infectious Change, Katherine A. Mason investigates local Chinese public health institutions in Southeastern China, examining how the outbreak of SARS re-imagined public health as a professionalized, biomedicalized, and technological machine—one that frequently failed to serve the Chinese people. Mason recounts the rapid transformation as young, highly trained biomedical scientists flooded into local public health institutions, replacing bureaucratic government inspectors who had dominated the field for decades. Infectious Change grapples with how public health in China was reinvented into a prestigious profession in which global impact and recognition were paramount—and service to vulnerable local communities was secondary.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

田野调查有一点瑕疵，但框架搭得很好，研究问题在矛盾中逐渐凸显。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

讲sars以后中国公共卫生体制在某不具名城市（一看就是深圳）的发展。可以看

评分☆☆☆☆☆

以深圳公卫体制的发展为案例，进行的医学人类学研究。对其人类学研究方法，理解有限，观感一般，不过本书是一本极好的讨论健康伦理的著作，充分展现了公卫发展过程中多个层次的伦理困境。公卫的管理对象和服务对象并不统一。其管理对象是部分人群，服务对象则是当地的民众，但专业从业人员，有对世界性学术共同体的归属感，对于当地被他们视为aggregate的低素质人群，却只看做完成研究的数据来源。这种紧张，从此次公众对石正丽的质疑，和她对人不对事的激烈反击，以及互相的不信任中被很好的体现。公卫的建立到底是为谁服务，是否能建立起像临床医学那样明确统一的ethic code，是非常值得深思的。此书固然缺少对公卫制度本身的研究，但是蕴含的洞见足以建立起它的地位。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

政治转型：爱国卫生运动，人民—>现代公共卫生体系，人口；the “common”：an idealized world of modernity, science, and trust that they hoped through their work to be able to find abroad and build at home，作为一种理想落实于现实的张力和错位， the common being served vs. the populations being governed；professional project and moral project

评分☆☆☆☆☆

田野调查有一点瑕疵，但框架搭得很好，研究问题在矛盾中逐渐凸显。