圖書標籤: 文學理論 Auerbach 奧爾巴赫 比較文學 literature 文藝理論 比較文學 德國
发表于2024-11-21
Mimesis pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
A half-century after its translation into English, Erich Auerbach's "Mimesis" still stands as a monumental achievement in literary criticism. A brilliant display of erudition, wit, and wisdom, his exploration of how great European writers from Homer to Virginia Woolf depicted reality has taught generations how to read Western literature. This new expanded edition includes a substantial essay in introduction by Edward Said as well as an essay, never before translated into English, in which Auerbach responds to his critics. A German Jew, Auerbach was forced out of his professorship at the University of Marburg in 1935. He left for Turkey, where he taught at the state university in Istanbul. There, he wrote "Mimesis", publishing it in German after the end of the war. Displaced as he was, Auerbach produced a work of great erudition that contains no footnotes, basing his arguments instead on searching, illuminating readings of key passages from his primary texts. His aim was to show how, from antiquity to the twentieth century, literature progressed toward ever more naturalistic and democratic forms of representation. This essentially optimistic view of European history now appears as a defensive - and impassioned - response to the inhumanity he saw in the Third Reich. Ranging over works in Greek, Latin, Spanish, French, Italian, German, and English, Auerbach used his remarkable skills in philology and comparative literature to refute any narrow form of nationalism or chauvinism, in his own day and ours. For many readers, both inside and outside the academy, "Mimesis" is among the finest works of literary criticism ever written.
Erich Auerbach, (born Nov. 9, 1892, Berlin, Ger.—died Oct. 13, 1957, Wallingford, Conn., U.S.), educator and scholar of Romance literatures and languages.
After gaining a doctorate in philology at the University of Greifswald, Germany, in 1921, Auerbach served as librarian for the Prussian State Library. From 1929 until his dismissal by the Nazi Party in 1936, he was ordinarius university professor of Romance philology at the University of Marburg. From 1936 to 1947 Auerbach taught at the Turkish State University in Istanbul, where he wrote his magisterial survey of the linguistic means of depicting reality in European literature, Mimesis: Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur (1946; Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature). He joined the faculty at Yale University in 1947, becoming Sterling professor of Romance philology in 1956. In 1949–50 he was a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, N.J.
Although Auerbach wrote a number of important scholarly studies, including Dante als Dichter der irdischen Welt (1929; Dante, Poet of the Secular World) and Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter (1958; Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages), his foremost work of literary criticism was Mimesis. This book not only offered philological and historical examinations of individual literary works, from the Hebrew Bible and Homer to Virginia Woolf and Marcel Proust, but also established an influential critical method, offering a history of culture through the close analyses of literary styles.
Homer, Dante and Shakespeare.真是太神瞭,用一個motif統攝各種批評方法,簡直就是批評的百科全書…
評分作者於二戰期間在伊斯坦布爾寫成,剋服瞭參考書嚴重不足(所以沒有腳注)和交通斷絕的睏難,雄心勃勃地討論瞭三韆年以來歐洲文學從荷馬史詩(原擬從柏拉圖開始)到現代派(Woolf, Proust, Joyce, Mann)中的現實主義問題。
評分Homer, Dante and Shakespeare.真是太神瞭,用一個motif統攝各種批評方法,簡直就是批評的百科全書…
評分開頭第一章大受震撼,之後很多都是不熟悉的文學作品,頗有些難懂。。。然而奧爾巴赫那種對文字,對語法語音,乃至於then這樣的轉摺處的細微體察,很有啓發。
評分讀之前先讀奧氏Philologie der Weltliteratur一文,會更理解他在Mimesis一文中所用的方法,即從一個小的Handhabe(抓手)齣發,對所想研究的大問題做一個ausstrahlen即穿透,舉例是想做神麯的接受,不如做神麯某一段落在不同時代的不同解讀。總的方法論上非常有指導意義。落到實踐,以seperation of styles和基督教figural的現實觀,去洞穿西方文學發展中的不斷變化。今人再看Mimesis,大概會詫異於他對現實這一概念的定義:感官的,有問題的,變化的,但正如奧氏對自己所做的辯解那樣,我們編織曆史的方式都是導嚮我們自身。結閤盧卡齊和Bloch現實主義之爭也頗有益處。
《摹仿论》并不是一部典型的现实主义文学史类的书籍,正如它的副标题所言它是关于“西方文学中现实的再现”问题的描述。换言之,是讨论了“现实”是怎样进入文本的这一问题。 奥尔巴赫全书的线索围绕着“文体流变”这一关键词,他认为有两种文体传统。一种是“古典主义的文体分...
評分本文翻译自Encyclopædia Universalis(法国综合大百科全书)的奥尔巴赫条目,撰写者为巴黎四大法语系主任Georges MOLINIÉ。这篇短文是为百科全书写的条目,尽管只有1000来词,但意思较难理解,所用的句式也偏复杂,将其转换成中文绝非易事。但作者比较精准地解释了奥尔巴...
評分王炎老师花了整整一学期讲这本书,饱含深情地表示这本书塑造了他对文学研究的认识。虽然奥尔巴赫宏大叙事的语文学阐释方法已经逐渐被微缩历史的研究范式所湮没,这部鸿篇巨制却仍然不失为欧洲文学史的撷珍(想来有不少研究方法,如钱钟书先生锥指管窥的漫谈,如上世纪80年代盛...
評分《摹仿论》并不是一部典型的现实主义文学史类的书籍,正如它的副标题所言它是关于“西方文学中现实的再现”问题的描述。换言之,是讨论了“现实”是怎样进入文本的这一问题。 奥尔巴赫全书的线索围绕着“文体流变”这一关键词,他认为有两种文体传统。一种是“古典主义的文体分...
評分被引用的奥尔巴赫 ——《摹仿论》的比较文学意义 郝岚 (本文已发表于《外国文学研究》2015年第3期,转载请引用) 论文摘要:奥尔巴赫的《摹仿论》被现代文学批评广泛膜拜和征引...
Mimesis pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024