Asia as Method pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Kuan-Hsing Chen is a professor in the Institute for Social Research and Cultural Studies at Chiao Tung University in Taiwan. He has written and edited many books in Chinese. He is co-executive editor of the journal Inter-Asia Cultural Studies.
- 文化研究
- 陳光興
- 思想史
- 陳光興
- 方法論
- 社會學
- 海外中國研究
- 人類學
Centering his analysis in the dynamic forces of modern East Asian history, Kuan-Hsing Chen recasts cultural studies as a politically urgent global endeavor. He argues that the intellectual and subjective work of decolonization begun across East Asia after the Second World War was stalled by the cold war. At the same time, the work of deimperialization became impossible to imagine in imperial centers such as Japan and the United States. Chen contends that it is now necessary to resume those tasks, and that decolonization, deimperialization, and an intellectual undoing of the cold war must proceed simultaneously. Combining postcolonial studies, globalization studies, and the emerging field of “Asian studies in Asia,” he insists that those on both sides of the imperial divide must assess the conduct, motives, and consequences of imperial histories.
Chen is one of the most important intellectuals working in East Asia today; his writing has been influential in Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and mainland China for the past fifteen years. As a founding member of the Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Society and its journal, he has helped to initiate change in the dynamics and intellectual orientation of the region, building a network that has facilitated inter-Asian connections. Asia as Method encapsulates Chen’s vision and activities within the increasingly “inter-referencing” East Asian intellectual community and charts necessary new directions for cultural studies.
具體描述
讀後感
1.作者没有用事实做证据 作者谈“帝国”与“殖民”问题，结果却完全没有谈帝国与殖民地是如何发展变化的。比如谈东亚，就要谈1954年东南亚条约组织以及它是怎么崩溃的，1958年东南亚联盟又是怎样形成的，这样自然就明白帝国是怎么“去”又是如何改头换面、卷土重来的。 类似的...
評分去帝國：亞洲作為方法- 陳光興 [行人文化實驗室] 斷斷續續地用左三個月終於係今晚臨訓前K.O.左呢本書。作為一個唔係好熟穩學術語言，又不諳史料理論的讀者，呢本書最好的地方係不厭其煩，將好多人地take it for granted的ideas同事件都詳細地解釋闡述，就算唔wiki都好accessi...
評分1.作者没有用事实做证据 作者谈“帝国”与“殖民”问题，结果却完全没有谈帝国与殖民地是如何发展变化的。比如谈东亚，就要谈1954年东南亚条约组织以及它是怎么崩溃的，1958年东南亚联盟又是怎样形成的，这样自然就明白帝国是怎么“去”又是如何改头换面、卷土重来的。 类似的...
評分- 好幾年前舊老板跟我推薦過台灣社會季刊的一個"超克分斷體制"的專題, 當時讀得胡里胡塗的, 除了大概記得當時有讀過關於韓過的批判知識份子如何看待南北韓分裂的體制是與冷戰架構相關, 兩韓政府(特別是民主化以前的南韓?)如何是讓體制的共謀等等....... - 反而很多關於台灣當...
評分1.作者没有用事实做证据 作者谈“帝国”与“殖民”问题，结果却完全没有谈帝国与殖民地是如何发展变化的。比如谈东亚，就要谈1954年东南亚条约组织以及它是怎么崩溃的，1958年东南亚联盟又是怎样形成的，这样自然就明白帝国是怎么“去”又是如何改头换面、卷土重来的。 类似的...
用戶評價
瀏覽。'...decolonization and deimperialization could not have unfolded until the emergence of an era of globalization...decolonization is the attempt of the previously colonized to reflectively work out a historical relation with the former colonizer, culturally, politically, and economically.'
评分仔細讀的當然是Asia as Method那章，將亞洲各文化互視作參照係，以此碎片化西方，最終實現對其解構。想法很impressive，雖然不太好操作。但最無語的是這本是我係core course上大傢一起讀的，竟然有人很認真的討論瞭asia as method怎麼運用於長安和奈良的比較，簡直去曆史化到吐血三升。明明是由於殖民冷戰等現代經驗纔打開的參照可能啊....
评分去殖民／去冷戰／去帝國的同構。對戰後颱灣的分析很清晰。（抓住瞭subjectivity宏觀分析我真的很受用）但既然西方已經內化，Asia內部的mutual referent怎麼析齣西方呢？以所謂relativization來引導知識生産引發結構性變革再影響到主體…好理想主義啊。
评分去殖民／去冷戰／去帝國的同構。對戰後颱灣的分析很清晰。（抓住瞭subjectivity宏觀分析我真的很受用）但既然西方已經內化，Asia內部的mutual referent怎麼析齣西方呢？以所謂relativization來引導知識生産引發結構性變革再影響到主體…好理想主義啊。
评分確實真摯 也確實political
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有