Centering his analysis in the dynamic forces of modern East Asian history, Kuan-Hsing Chen recasts cultural studies as a politically urgent global endeavor. He argues that the intellectual and subjective work of decolonization begun across East Asia after the Second World War was stalled by the cold war. At the same time, the work of deimperialization became impossible to imagine in imperial centers such as Japan and the United States. Chen contends that it is now necessary to resume those tasks, and that decolonization, deimperialization, and an intellectual undoing of the cold war must proceed simultaneously. Combining postcolonial studies, globalization studies, and the emerging field of “Asian studies in Asia,” he insists that those on both sides of the imperial divide must assess the conduct, motives, and consequences of imperial histories.
Chen is one of the most important intellectuals working in East Asia today; his writing has been influential in Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and mainland China for the past fifteen years. As a founding member of the Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Society and its journal, he has helped to initiate change in the dynamics and intellectual orientation of the region, building a network that has facilitated inter-Asian connections. Asia as Method encapsulates Chen’s vision and activities within the increasingly “inter-referencing” East Asian intellectual community and charts necessary new directions for cultural studies.
Kuan-Hsing Chen is a professor in the Institute for Social Research and Cultural Studies at Chiao Tung University in Taiwan. He has written and edited many books in Chinese. He is co-executive editor of the journal Inter-Asia Cultural Studies.
- 好幾年前舊老板跟我推薦過台灣社會季刊的一個"超克分斷體制"的專題, 當時讀得胡里胡塗的, 除了大概記得當時有讀過關於韓過的批判知識份子如何看待南北韓分裂的體制是與冷戰架構相關, 兩韓政府(特別是民主化以前的南韓?)如何是讓體制的共謀等等....... - 反而很多關於台灣當...
评分- 好幾年前舊老板跟我推薦過台灣社會季刊的一個"超克分斷體制"的專題, 當時讀得胡里胡塗的, 除了大概記得當時有讀過關於韓過的批判知識份子如何看待南北韓分裂的體制是與冷戰架構相關, 兩韓政府(特別是民主化以前的南韓?)如何是讓體制的共謀等等....... - 反而很多關於台灣當...
评分- 好幾年前舊老板跟我推薦過台灣社會季刊的一個"超克分斷體制"的專題, 當時讀得胡里胡塗的, 除了大概記得當時有讀過關於韓過的批判知識份子如何看待南北韓分裂的體制是與冷戰架構相關, 兩韓政府(特別是民主化以前的南韓?)如何是讓體制的共謀等等....... - 反而很多關於台灣當...
评分- 好幾年前舊老板跟我推薦過台灣社會季刊的一個"超克分斷體制"的專題, 當時讀得胡里胡塗的, 除了大概記得當時有讀過關於韓過的批判知識份子如何看待南北韓分裂的體制是與冷戰架構相關, 兩韓政府(特別是民主化以前的南韓?)如何是讓體制的共謀等等....... - 反而很多關於台灣當...
评分1.作者没有用事实做证据 作者谈“帝国”与“殖民”问题,结果却完全没有谈帝国与殖民地是如何发展变化的。比如谈东亚,就要谈1954年东南亚条约组织以及它是怎么崩溃的,1958年东南亚联盟又是怎样形成的,这样自然就明白帝国是怎么“去”又是如何改头换面、卷土重来的。 类似的...
对亚洲各个地区非常了解的学者,问题意识非常赞。大陆的缺席。
评分好书好书
评分仔细读的当然是Asia as Method那章,将亚洲各文化互视作参照系,以此碎片化西方,最终实现对其解构。想法很impressive,虽然不太好操作。但最无语的是这本是我系core course上大家一起读的,竟然有人很认真的讨论了asia as method怎么运用于长安和奈良的比较,简直去历史化到吐血三升。明明是由于殖民冷战等现代经验才打开的参照可能啊....
评分……
评分真挚,酣畅淋漓。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有