Matthew H. Sommer is Associate Professor of History at Stanford University.
This study of the regulation of sexuality in the Qing dynasty explores the social context for sexual behavior criminalized by the state, arguing that the eighteenth century in China was a time of profound change in sexual matters. During this time, the basic organizing principle for state regulation of sexuality shifted away from status, under which members of different groups had long been held to distinct standards of familial and sexual morality. In its place, a new regime of gender mandated a uniform standard of sexual morality and criminal liability across status boundaries—all people were expected to conform to gender roles defined in terms of marriage.
This shift in the regulation of sexuality, manifested in official treatment of charges of adultery, rape, sodomy, widow chastity, and prostitution, represented the imperial state’s efforts to cope with disturbing social and demographic changes. Anachronistic status categories were discarded to accommodate a more fluid social structure, and the state initiated new efforts to enforce rigid gender roles and thus to shore up the peasant family against a swelling underclass of single, rogue males outside the family system. These men were demonized as sexual predators who threatened the chaste wives and daughters (and the young sons) of respectable households, and a flood of new legislation targeted them for suppression.
In addition to presenting official and judicial actions regarding sexuality, the book tells the story of people excluded from accepted patterns of marriage and household who bonded with each other in unorthodox ways (combining sexual union with resource pooling and fictive kinship) to satisfy a range of human needs. This previously invisible dimension of Qing social practice is brought into sharp focus by the testimony, gleaned from local and central court archives, of such marginalized people as peasants, laborers, and beggars.
补个2016.6月的读后小记。 苏成捷对帝国晚期的研究,专有关于强奸的部分。唐宋时,强奸的判定是只要不能证明女性自愿就判定为强奸,明清时,只要不能证明男性是强迫就判定是女性自愿。 苏成捷研究了发生在雍乾嘉的 46个强奸案,发现是否判定为强奸更多是依靠女方的反应非男方的...
评分《中华帝国晚期的性、法律和社会》(Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China),是美国学者苏成捷(Matthew H. Sommer)的一部得到广泛好评的著作。书中,苏成捷广征博引,运用了从汉代至清代的大量法律史文献(以清代中央和地方档案为主),分析了清代对待性犯罪的法制...
评分《中华帝国晚期的性、法律和社会》(Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China),是美国学者苏成捷(Matthew H. Sommer)的一部得到广泛好评的著作。书中,苏成捷广征博引,运用了从汉代至清代的大量法律史文献(以清代中央和地方档案为主),分析了清代对待性犯罪的法制...
评分补个2016.6月的读后小记。 苏成捷对帝国晚期的研究,专有关于强奸的部分。唐宋时,强奸的判定是只要不能证明女性自愿就判定为强奸,明清时,只要不能证明男性是强迫就判定是女性自愿。 苏成捷研究了发生在雍乾嘉的 46个强奸案,发现是否判定为强奸更多是依靠女方的反应非男方的...
评分《中华帝国晚期的性、法律和社会》(Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China),是美国学者苏成捷(Matthew H. Sommer)的一部得到广泛好评的著作。书中,苏成捷广征博引,运用了从汉代至清代的大量法律史文献(以清代中央和地方档案为主),分析了清代对待性犯罪的法制...
从法律档案中透视出sexuality hierarchy、国家的规训权力以及帝国晚期国家能力强化和市民享乐文化兴起的背景下民间自主的性实践和性观念,希望自己也能写出这么厉害的书呀~20181108
评分很好 第一次喜歡歷史書…
评分从法律档案中透视出sexuality hierarchy、国家的规训权力以及帝国晚期国家能力强化和市民享乐文化兴起的背景下民间自主的性实践和性观念,希望自己也能写出这么厉害的书呀~20181108
评分头一次有种看书时感到被作者爱着的感觉(或许只是我看书太少了)。能把 -身体的-历史-上升到-政治-层面而且重点是论证-流畅-详实-词汇又不高阶让我这种菜鸟都能读下去,真是很棒了。
评分污の学术,封面姦字吓人却暗指三种主要事件:强奸(何谓女性节烈,何谓用强等秩序界限),合奸(婚外性行为冲击婚姻秩序),鸡奸(男男性行为法律界定、对基于男性家长制的社会秩序和男性气概污染等)。除借福柯性史还有保卫社会概念,略中西二元对立之理想型认定清朝极力维持家长制、稳定婚姻、财产分配和个人处于国家管治道德教化家庭组织三元规范秩序内,长时段耕地减少、人口增长、地方社会纽带崩解造成男性贫穷流民增多,冲击差序等级和家长制,迫使国家新规训手段从地位转向性别秩序,压抑女性(守贞为良、反抗强奸为节烈、通奸犯罪、卖淫犯罪、寡妇守丧不得再嫁和财产分配受歧视),重新界定男性可接受性行为(强奸重罚,丈夫对妻子可用强,嫖娼犯法),寡妇财产分配注重平衡利益,力图塑造基于性的新秩序也塑造接受性规训与一系列规训的被治者。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有