贺萧(Gail B. Hershatter),女,美国斯坦福大学获博士学位,现任美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁斯校区历史系教授、文化研究中心主任。她长期从事文化史、劳工史、妇女史、性史和女性主义理论的研究。她的著作丰富,有《天津工人:1900-1949》、与霍尼格合著的《美国女学者眼中的中国女性》,与吉尔马丁等合编的《中国的产生:妇女、文化和国家》(哈佛大学出版社,1994年),与霍尼格等合编的《重新勘测中国》(斯坦福大学出版社,1996年),与霍尼格等合编的《中国妇女研究指南》(加州伯克利大学东亚研究所,1999年)等书。现正在研究中国西北农村的妇女问题,主题也是历史、记忆与社会性别身份问题。
This pioneering work examines prostitution in Shanghai from the late nineteenth century to the present. Drawn mostly from the daughters and wives of the working poor and declasse elites, prostitutes in Shanghai were near the bottom of class and gender hierarchies. Yet they were central figures in Shanghai urban life, entering the historical record whenever others wanted to appreciate, castigate, count, regulate, cure, pathologize, warn about, rescue, eliminate, or deploy them as a symbol in a larger social panorama. Over the past century, prostitution has been understood in many ways: as a source of urbanized pleasures, a profession full of unscrupulous and greedy schemers, a changing site of work for women, a source of moral danger and physical disease, a marker of national decay, and a sign of modernity. For the Communist leadership of the 1950s, the elimination of prostitution symbolized China's emergence as a strong, healthy, and modern nation. In the past decade, as prostitution once again has become a recognized feature of Chinese society, it has been incorporated into a larger public discussion about what kind of modernity China should seek and what kind of sex and gender arrangements should characterize that modernity. Prostitutes, like every other non-elite group, did not record their own lives. How can sources generated by intense public argument about the 'larger' meanings of prostitution be read for clues to those lives? Hershatter makes use of a broad range of materials: guidebooks to the pleasure quarters, collections of anecdotes about high-class courtesans, tabloid gossip columns, municipal regulations prohibiting street soliciting, police interrogations of streetwalkers and those accused of trafficking in women, newspaper reports on court cases involving both courtesans and streetwalkers, polemics by Chinese and foreign reformers, learned articles by Chinese scholars commenting on the world history of prostitution and analyzing its local causes, surveys by doctors and social workers on sexually transmitted disease in various Shanghai populations, relief agency records, fictionalized accounts of the scams and sufferings of prostitutes, memoirs by former courtesan house patrons, and interviews with former officials and reformers. Although a courtesan may never set pen to paper, we can infer a great deal about her strategizing and working of the system through the vast cautionary literature that tells her customers how not to be defrauded by her. Newspaper accounts of the arrests and brief court testimonies of Shanghai streetwalkers let us glimpse the way that prostitutes positioned themselves to get the most they could from the legal system. Without recourse to direct speech, Hershatter argues, these women have nevertheless left an audible trace. Central to this study is the investigation of how things are known and later remembered, and how, later still, they are simultaneously apprehended and reinvented by the historian.
这本书可以和Christian Henriot, Prostitution and Sexuality in Shanghai: A Social History, 1849-1949, (French edition 1997, English edition 2001) 一起读。后者更偏向社会学,用了很多档案和数据。 Gail Hershatter and Christian Henriot both focused their women’s...
评分 评分人类的文字从一开始就受到了诅咒:当它们脱离言说的唇齿,变为实体的铅字时,一场对言说者无可奈何的叛逃就开始了,我们永远无法知道,被记录下来的文字在多大程度上保存了言说者的本意,与精确的逐字落实相比,从言说到文字的过程可能更的充斥着逃逸、耗损与丢失。 所以,诉诸...
评分东莞扫黄?没用的 且不说它先天就是运动式的,所以娘胎里就注定长久不了。书里写了建国前几次扫黄,无一例外以官方难看失败告终。娼妓制度是资本主义社会不可避免的,是现代性的一部分。 新中国成立之后有一次相对(这个相对也很值得怀疑)成功的扫黄,因为它改变了妓院得以繁...
评分这套书最大的弊病就是把注释都统一放后面了,也不知道编辑怎么想的,太不人性化了。600多页的书,看的时候不断地前后翻,手都酸了,还要插两张书签,否则根本找不到对应的注释。 现在出了新版了,价格上去了,不知道这个问题解决了没有。
Prostitution and Modernity in Twentieth-Century Shanghai// 写的真的很好
评分详实
评分5 years ago, I prefered this book to CH's...I heard that some historians in Stanford strongly discredited GH's historical approach, and thus denied to give her the faculty position in Stanford..it makes me rethink the importance of "sources" for "history" .
评分详实
评分Some comments here are extremely narrow-minded and judgemental. It's not your definition of history that only counts as history. If you prefer Henriot's book, go comment under his. Spreading some unreliable rumor here makes you look ridiculous.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有