Vivienne Shue is Professor and Chair of the Department of Government at Cornell University.
These four conceptual and critical essays on state and society in contemporary China argue vigorously against the grain of prevailing scholarly interpretation. In substantive content, they explore two major themes from different historical and theoretical points of departure.
First, the author argues that the party/state under Mao fell far short of the full control over China's peasant society that outside observers often assumed it had achieved. She shows, instead, how the Maoist state frequently pursued policies that in fact had the ironic effect of strengthening the resistance of rural communities against the central political apparatus. Second, she contends that once the true limitations on the Maoist state's power in rural areas are rightly understood, it becomes clear that one effect of the post-Mao economic and political reforms may be to enhance rather than to diminish the state's authority in the countryside — despite all the reformists' rhetoric to the contrary.
These essays on "how to think about the Chinese state" are designed to stimulate debate about assumptions and methods in the field of Chinese political analysis. The controversies they raise, however, make them highly relevant to scholars outside Chinese studies who are interested in theories of the state, in the interrelations of state and society, and in the fate of the peasantry under socialism.
評分
評分
評分
評分
國傢與社會關係、“過程”取嚮。三種方法論。
评分國傢的整閤、抽取、介入和地方自主性。從毛時代的蜂巢到鄧時代的網,鄧(聯盟)以“現代化”為口號,完成模式的轉換。在之前,1911年革命之後,因為一直很苦逼,軍閥、日寇還有叛亂,國傢是比較無力的。 總之,主要的立足點在於打臉“totalitarianism”,提齣一個研究中國的新的可能,更希望超越這個可能。
评分so, in the post-reform era, only the appearance of localistic and complicit bureaucrats persists, the morality of local protectionism along with the honeycomb-like social structure in which it was embedded in are replaced by the calculation of self-interested technocrats and their structural buddy of the web-like market economy.
评分前三十年的中國政治並不是簡單的全能主義式,國傢的觸手並未能實現控製鄉村,鄉村社會呈現蜂窩狀,鄉村精英有一定的保護主義傾嚮,反而是改革開放後,地方政府公司化讓政府之手伸得更遠。其實,這個研究和盧暉臨的研究本質上有些類似性,並且盧暉臨做得更好。
评分自己纔疏學淺,花瞭好長時間終於明白reach在這裏做觸手講。書本身已經過時瞭,但一些觀點依然富有洞見。不過英語優美得有些晦澀瞭,還是不怎麼欣賞得瞭。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有