Ronald C. Egan is Professor of Sinology in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Stanford University.
Widely considered the preeminent Chinese woman poet, Li Qingzhao (1084-1150s) occupies a crucial place in China’s literary and cultural history. She stands out as the great exception to the rule that the first-rank poets in premodern China were male. But at what price to our understanding of her as a writer does this distinction come? The Burden of Female Talent challenges conventional modes of thinking about Li Qingzhao as a devoted but often lonely wife and, later, a forlorn widow. By examining manipulations of her image by the critical tradition in later imperial times and into the twentieth century, Ronald C. Egan brings to light the ways in which critics sought to accommodate her to cultural norms, molding her “talent” to make it compatible with ideals of womanly conduct and identity. Contested images of Li, including a heated controversy concerning her remarriage and its implications for her “devotion” to her first husband, reveal the difficulty literary culture has had in coping with this woman of extraordinary conduct and ability. The study ends with a reappraisal of Li’s poetry, freed from the autobiographical and reductive readings that were traditionally imposed on it and which remain standard even today.
这篇措辞雅驯的私信,边查典故边理解品味,看得心里五味陈杂。想到最近新闻频频曝出的家暴事件,真是心寒。。。 古有善诉谈娘,沦为滑稽喜剧配角; 今有中浦悠花,被批卖惨炒作人设。 “虽南山之竹,岂能穷多口之谈?” 一个家暴的话题,跨越千年, 受害者的处境,却依旧如此相...
评分2019已读19(传记01)作者查询的资料以及书籍很多,工程浩大。让我感到悲哀的是,某些文人学者对李清照的嘲讽,特别是胡仔,我记住了这个名字,写出了这么好的东西,就因为世俗理念被贬得一文不值,这是一直以来都存在的问题,一个作者或者一个学者,他的个人履历与他的作品之...
评分在我的阅读范围所及,田晓菲和王宇根的关于(特别是《尘几录》和《万卷》)文学人物在历史长河中的形象建构与解构的作品,曾带给了我很多的启发(更准确地说是一种思路的开拓,这也是汉学家所谓的“问题意识”),让我学着重新审视一些被我作为认知作家们的作品与人品的前提的...
评分这篇措辞雅驯的私信,边查典故边理解品味,看得心里五味陈杂。想到最近新闻频频曝出的家暴事件,真是心寒。。。 古有善诉谈娘,沦为滑稽喜剧配角; 今有中浦悠花,被批卖惨炒作人设。 “虽南山之竹,岂能穷多口之谈?” 一个家暴的话题,跨越千年, 受害者的处境,却依旧如此相...
评分在我的阅读范围所及,田晓菲和王宇根的关于(特别是《尘几录》和《万卷》)文学人物在历史长河中的形象建构与解构的作品,曾带给了我很多的启发(更准确地说是一种思路的开拓,这也是汉学家所谓的“问题意识”),让我学着重新审视一些被我作为认知作家们的作品与人品的前提的...
This book basically renders obsolete all previous works on Li Qingzhao. Can't recommend it strongly enough.
评分learnt a lot from it-very inspirational and well written
评分This book basically renders obsolete all previous works on Li Qingzhao. Can't recommend it strongly enough.
评分很comprehensive的研究,前半部就李清照于其时的女性/文人的身份地位出发重新考察了比如自传式书写、《金石录》后序、再婚等等经典问题,颇有新的见解;书的后半部分则关注李清照形象在后世的接受和层累变迁,也很细致。我对这个领域并不了解,但就阅读第一感觉来说,那些被批驳的旧观点自然暴露出男性中心等偏见,但一些revisionist的论点如果实证不足,是否也难脱在女性主义影响下强行修正的嫌疑(比如解读《词论》的地方,Egan对李作为“女性”词人的发言位置的认定在性别上还挺essentialized的,但其实《词论》中李八郎的故事很有强调performance/preemption的灵活机巧的一面)?但也确实因为年代久远,实证难寻了吧。
评分谢谢彦霄扫描前言与结尾,出国后一定要读完。和中文的清照评传之寻溯系年不同,该书开门见山地质疑了历代传递下来清照作品的真实性。第一部分重构当时的社会环境之于女性作家,强调向来未被重视的"historicized apprehension"。与中文评传相同的是反驳了将清照词作为纯粹的个人抒情来看。作者将李清照再嫁(张汝舟?)并告离视为她创作的一个转折点("writings from aftermath") 7-9章叙述了明清时期妇女写作的更被接受、但同时守贞观念加强- 这两者在清照身上的冲撞所造成的对其scholarship的影响。清照对明诚死后忠贞的寡妇形象,对其再嫁一事的掩盖就是晚清时期渐盛的,紧接着作者叙述五四时期对于此点的争议,并且之后置于全世界的gender dynamic环境中。作者
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有