Yunxiang Yan is Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Adjunct Professor in the School of Public Policy and Social Development, Fudan University, China. He is the author of Te Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village (Stanford University Press, 1996), Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999 (Stanford University Press, 2003) and The Individualization of Chinese Society (Berg, 2009). His research interests include family and kinship, social change, the individual and individualization, and moral changes in post-Mao China.
For seven years in the 1970s, the author lived in a village in northeast China as an ordinary farmer. In 1989, he returned to the village as an anthropologist to begin the unparalleled span of eleven years’ fieldwork that has resulted in this book―a comprehensive, vivid, and nuanced account of family change and the transformation of private life in rural China from 1949 to 1999. The author’s focus on the personal and the emotional sets this book apart from most studies of the Chinese family. Yan explores private lives to examine areas of family life that have been largely overlooked, such as emotion, desire, intimacy, privacy, conjugality, and individuality. He concludes that the past five decades have witnessed a dual transformation of private life: the rise of the private family, within which the private lives of individual women and men are thriving.
闫云翔的田野调查扎实、案头工作详实,例子生动鲜活、很有人情味,第一手数据资料可靠可信,写作风格沉稳朴实、层层推进。溢美之词不再赘述。总之,作为列文森图书奖获奖作品,《私人生活的变革》不仅承载了作者作为一位杰出的人类学家的勤恳、才华和人文关怀,也将启...
评分此书在美国学术界颇受好评,我也已久仰大名,五月回国时看到有中译本,便买来一本。这次去黑龙江之前想找本书在路上打发时间,想到此书是众多以中国的村庄为研究对象的人类学、社会学著作中我所知的唯一一本研究黑龙江农村的,正合我此行之意,便带上在路上看。 总的来说,此...
评分闫云翔的田野调查扎实、案头工作详实,例子生动鲜活、很有人情味,第一手数据资料可靠可信,写作风格沉稳朴实、层层推进。溢美之词不再赘述。总之,作为列文森图书奖获奖作品,《私人生活的变革》不仅承载了作者作为一位杰出的人类学家的勤恳、才华和人文关怀,也将启...
私人生活,还是家庭生活
评分讲述了一个东北村落亲密关系的变化,有两个蛮有意思的点,一个是private,但看起来和private/public的理念没有什么关系;另一点则是从1950一直到市场经济下,作者都用了“under socialism”,代表作者认同中间的连贯性(而非“post-socialism”)
评分如此长时间的田野采访,本该能写出更多东西的,不该如此蜻蜓点水
评分论文需要又重读了其中几章,有些东西的确没谈透。比如中国乡村社会对浪漫爱情和情感的定义表达。这大概就是人类学的优势和问题。在现象层面白描一个村子,但理论解释总是差强人意。
评分又重读。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有