Purity and Danger pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Mary Douglas is a central figure within British social anthropology. Studying under Evans-Pritchard at Oxford immediately after the war, she formed part of the group of anthropologists who established social anthropology's standing in the world of scholarship. Her works, spanning the second half of the twentieth century, have been widely read and her theories applied across the social sciences and humanities.
- 人类学
- 社会学
- Anthropology
- 纯净与危险
- 文化
- 社会学/人类学
- 英语
- 新文化史
在线阅读本书
Mary Douglas is a central figure within British social anthropology. Studying under Evans-Pritchard at Oxford immediately after the war, she formed part of the group of anthropologists who established social anthropology's standing in the world of scholarship. Her works, spanning the second half of the twentieth century, have been widely read and her theories applied across the social sciences and humanities.
具体描述
读后感
闲话： 本来此番欲尝试“书皮学”之运用来完成对一本书——《东写西读》的评论，只是抱书痛思数刻，毫无所获。转念，想扯谈一点关于书店的话语，只是碍于一身背囊，好书店未去几个，终叹息而将此念抛飞。没有办法，只好来稍稍谈谈这花费小生将近一月终将其读罢且尚余混沌...
评分 评分闲话： 本来此番欲尝试“书皮学”之运用来完成对一本书——《东写西读》的评论，只是抱书痛思数刻，毫无所获。转念，想扯谈一点关于书店的话语，只是碍于一身背囊，好书店未去几个，终叹息而将此念抛飞。没有办法，只好来稍稍谈谈这花费小生将近一月终将其读罢且尚余混沌...
评分在网上找到一些此书的书评。发现阐发的内容多于对本书的总结，反而容易对欲读此书者造成误导。 其实作者讨论的核心是如何通过分类建立社会秩序。有关旧约中《利未记〉食物分类，只是一个引子。证明的是1) 食物的偏好其实反映了人与上帝之间的关系：只有可以上祭坛的，才可以被...
评分道格拉斯对旧约《圣经》的理解，有她自己的考量。她认为，圣经作者将某些反常的动物，现象，不符合一种特定的分类目录，归为unclean。要证明道格拉斯的观点基本很难，因为当时留存，可以相互印证的文本很少。而且道格拉斯也不是《圣经》研究者，她基本没有通过《圣经》成书时代...
用户评价
“Separating, purifying, demarcating and punishing transgressions have as their main function to impose system on an inherently untidy experience. It is only by exaggerating the difference between within and without, about and below, male and female, with and against, that a semblance of order is created.” (Introduction, P.4)
评分題解：本書意在藉由探討原始文化中對於不淨與禁忌的觀念，闡發作者對原始文化的構造與其運作的理解。文化的主要功能為建立秩序及維繫社群運作，對於何為淨、何為不淨的觀念，當然也與文化的此一面向有關。人類基本的認識方式為替事物分類，並以此建立人與人間、人與自然的秩序。不淨的事物具有在分類架構中曖昧、模糊、逾越界線的特性，因此造成對秩序的威脅；然而亦可說，正是此種「危險」的可能，從反向鞏固了文化的結構本身。原始文化中的儀式或法術，其實是展演或反映了其社會構造，不能說是幼稚、無知的初級心靈的表現。原始文化與現代文化的差異在於前者為整全的，後者則是分化的，以幼稚／成熟、野蠻／文明的視角來觀察兩者，是一種狹隘的視角，無能帶給我們對文化健全的了解。
评分“Separating, purifying, demarcating and punishing transgressions have as their main function to impose system on an inherently untidy experience. It is only by exaggerating the difference between within and without, about and below, male and female, with and against, that a semblance of order is created.” (Introduction, P.4)
评分Keywords: ritual holiness, purity of body, orderliness; verses danger, disorder but also new possibilities
评分开启了很多重要的问题，特别是ambiguity，及其与符号诊断和文化表演的关系，但是论述的较为肤浅，也通俗易懂。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有