圖書標籤: 政治學 社會學 曆史社會學 政治社會學 HistoricalSociology 比較政治 政治 Revolution
发表于2025-05-25
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
還是值得一讀的著作。放在學術史的角度去看會更有意思。
評分花很多精力讀完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; because of these, three revolutions, their causes and outcomes can be compared. political crises+peasant revolts-->more centralized, bureaucratic state.
評分很多觀點不錯 但是就像老師說得 作者的曆史簡直めちゃくちゃ
評分就思想性來說,還是更喜歡摩爾那本。但這本書更加嚴謹,影響力也更大。而且前兩天纔知道,原來Skocpol是我導當年的指導老師之一。。。
評分一直覺得老潘的路子從這裏來的,當然還有moore
Skocpol的这本书一向被奉研究国家与革命的经典。用今天的眼光看来,这本书在方法和史料分析判断上似乎都存在不少问题,但其方法论上的创新曾经一度引起学界的一股风潮,获得过美国社会研究界的很多奖项,至今仍然是研究国家和社会革命的必读经典书目;只是随着时间流逝,其...
評分近五百年来的各国历史,基本上就是它们如何实现现代化的历史。这其中有一个不容忽视的现象,即荷兰、英国、美国、日本等海洋型国家的转变完成得比较顺利,而三个大陆型国家法、俄、中,则都是在经过长期痛苦、代价高昂的流血革命之后,才最终脱胎换骨,完成对国家和社会的重新...
評分人们为什么起来革命?当我们检视世界漫长的历史,尤其是当我们面对着生活在中国大地上坚忍沉默的农民和他们的生活时,这个问题看起来更加不那么简单和引人入胜。这是斯考契波的著作《国家与社会革命》何以引人关注的原因之一,而本书的副标题“对法国、俄国和中国的比较...
評分2016年5月10日 《国家与社会革命》 ……我不能要求一个政治作家是一个作家……然而真的太蛋疼了……什么鬼描述,绝对是普通人看完也全无印象的类型……发现看了三本都是这个蛋疼法。 只能挑感兴趣的章节细读。不然看不进去。 那么少人对政治感兴趣,难道也有这个原因?我想到那...
評分译者序写得很好,是很好的全书概括,提纲挈领。 本书是第三代革命研究中的代表。第一代革命研究在20世纪初到40年底啊,追寻革命的历史事实,所谓“自然史学派”,描述并总结;第二代试图找寻革命的普适性理论,是二战后到70年代;第三代便是本书,强调结构性视角,从70年代中期...
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025