THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。 悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革...
評分2016年5月10日 《国家与社会革命》 ……我不能要求一个政治作家是一个作家……然而真的太蛋疼了……什么鬼描述,绝对是普通人看完也全无印象的类型……发现看了三本都是这个蛋疼法。 只能挑感兴趣的章节细读。不然看不进去。 那么少人对政治感兴趣,难道也有这个原因?我想到那...
評分 評分研究生院的方法课是一种蛮奇怪的存在。就像其他的graduate seminar一样,课上基本上不告诉你任何定论,而是把你当作成熟的研究者,直接把你带入到学术圈重要的辩论中去。但对于一个急切的想知道做研究是什么样子的、怎么上手做研究的一年级学生来说,直接读那种在方法论上吵来...
評分近五百年来的各国历史,基本上就是它们如何实现现代化的历史。这其中有一个不容忽视的现象,即荷兰、英国、美国、日本等海洋型国家的转变完成得比较顺利,而三个大陆型国家法、俄、中,则都是在经过长期痛苦、代价高昂的流血革命之后,才最终脱胎换骨,完成对国家和社会的重新...
比較曆史社會學的開山之作,可以說是提供瞭新的方法和視野,居功至偉。但是仍然有不少槽點,例如斯考切波過於想要把實證規律鑲嵌在宏大敘事中;對“科學性”過於執著的追求導緻瞭曆史過程中的種種麯摺與異質性被忽視;把史學研究當做給自己搬磚的從而忽視史料,令敘事過於空泛
评分這學期的三個大主題就social revolution我學的最好啦~~~
评分第一本可以說讀瞭大約三分之二的英文書。為自己彈冠相慶一下!俄國部分沒有太讀,法國部分結閤“波拿巴的霧月十八”,但其實還是雲裏霧裏,有時間一定要按Johnny建議補一下“1848-1850法蘭西階級鬥爭”;中國部分我覺得還是沒有解釋好軍閥在地方割據時的動員能力,以及愛國主義思潮在其中發生的作用(當然文化部分似乎並不在其討論範圍)。最後還有一個問題:帝製傳統其實在新政權中是否還有延續的體現?趙鼎新說現代化進程由國傢官僚化和資本主義化兩部分構成,而中國其實是不缺第一部分的,曆史上便已經很健全(而Skocpol認為晚清中央政府已經控製不到官僚和地方,這該怎樣解釋?同樣的張力在法國也存在)。這種延續在如今中國的體現,或許也是趙與孔一些人研究的方嚮(孔所言)。其實我更該從曆史書中獲得答案。
评分我覺得嘛,就是鬍扯(一個個人偏見,不一定對(一定對))
评分第一本可以說讀瞭大約三分之二的英文書。為自己彈冠相慶一下!俄國部分沒有太讀,法國部分結閤“波拿巴的霧月十八”,但其實還是雲裏霧裏,有時間一定要按Johnny建議補一下“1848-1850法蘭西階級鬥爭”;中國部分我覺得還是沒有解釋好軍閥在地方割據時的動員能力,以及愛國主義思潮在其中發生的作用(當然文化部分似乎並不在其討論範圍)。最後還有一個問題:帝製傳統其實在新政權中是否還有延續的體現?趙鼎新說現代化進程由國傢官僚化和資本主義化兩部分構成,而中國其實是不缺第一部分的,曆史上便已經很健全(而Skocpol認為晚清中央政府已經控製不到官僚和地方,這該怎樣解釋?同樣的張力在法國也存在)。這種延續在如今中國的體現,或許也是趙與孔一些人研究的方嚮(孔所言)。其實我更該從曆史書中獲得答案。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有