图书标签: 政治学 社会学 历史社会学 政治社会学 HistoricalSociology 比较政治 政治 Revolution
发表于2024-11-24
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
我觉得嘛,就是胡扯(一个个人偏见,不一定对(一定对))
评分深入浅出,清晰全面而有力。虽然方法上有些问题。
评分经验分析部分比方法论部分成功
评分这学期的三个大主题就social revolution我学的最好啦~~~
评分第一本可以说读了大约三分之二的英文书。为自己弹冠相庆一下!俄国部分没有太读,法国部分结合“波拿巴的雾月十八”,但其实还是云里雾里,有时间一定要按Johnny建议补一下“1848-1850法蘭西階級鬥爭”;中国部分我觉得还是没有解释好军阀在地方割据时的动员能力,以及爱国主义思潮在其中发生的作用(当然文化部分似乎并不在其讨论范围)。最后还有一个问题:帝制传统其实在新政权中是否还有延续的体现?赵鼎新说现代化进程由国家官僚化和资本主义化两部分构成,而中国其实是不缺第一部分的,历史上便已经很健全(而Skocpol认为晚清中央政府已经控制不到官僚和地方,这该怎样解释?同样的张力在法国也存在)。这种延续在如今中国的体现,或许也是赵与孔一些人研究的方向(孔所言)。其实我更该从历史书中获得答案。
一、梳理:社会革命的演进类型与原因 对于我来说这本《国家与社会革命》是一本读起来令人振奋的学术专著,它拥有宏大的历史叙事,但是并不因此显得繁琐铺陈,斯考切波通过结构性的视角和历史比较的方法,将近代史上三场宏伟的社会革命进行对比,分析了其发生的原因,也...
评分上学期修“比较政治经济学”课的时候总听朱老师和同学提到斯考切波的《国家与社会革命》,于是产生了强烈的阅读欲。从图书馆借出来两次,但都因为当时上课任务比较重加上还有很多事要干而放弃了,这次终于下定决心拿出两天时间将之看完。这本书是斯考切波在哈佛大学的博士...
评分译者序写得很好,是很好的全书概括,提纲挈领。 本书是第三代革命研究中的代表。第一代革命研究在20世纪初到40年底啊,追寻革命的历史事实,所谓“自然史学派”,描述并总结;第二代试图找寻革命的普适性理论,是二战后到70年代;第三代便是本书,强调结构性视角,从70年代中期...
评分 评分2016年5月10日 《国家与社会革命》 ……我不能要求一个政治作家是一个作家……然而真的太蛋疼了……什么鬼描述,绝对是普通人看完也全无印象的类型……发现看了三本都是这个蛋疼法。 只能挑感兴趣的章节细读。不然看不进去。 那么少人对政治感兴趣,难道也有这个原因?我想到那...
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024