洞穴奇案的十四種判決

洞穴奇案的十四種判決 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

薩伯(Peter suber,1951- ),影響甚廣的“開放近用運動”(open Access Movement,提倡在科研文獻發錶的同時,將電子文本在網上公布,以便讀者免費取閱)的發起人。1973年畢業於美國葉爾漢姆學院,1978年獲西北大學哲學博士學位。長期擔任葉爾漢姆學院哲學教授,也講授法律、計算機等其他課程。薩伯從事很多領域的社會活動,兼任SPARC(“學者齣版與學術資源聯盟”)高級研究員和耶魯大學法學院信息社會項目訪問學者等多項職務,還是兩傢網站(openaccessnews和ODenaccessletters)的博客作者。1991年齣版專著《自我修正的悖論》。

出版者:商務印書館(香港)有限公司
作者:薩伯(Peter Suber)
出品人:
頁數:0
译者:陳福勇
出版時間:2006
價格:0
裝幀:
isbn號碼:9789620763601
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 法律 
  • 法學 
  • 哲學 
  • 法理學 
  • 道德 
  • 法理 
  • 洞穴奇案的十四種判決 
  • 美國 
  •  
想要找書就要到 小哈圖書下載中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all

time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors

may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative

suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what

makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but what makes law itself interesting. It

would not make a good movie; it is all ?talking heads.? In fact, the parts that

would make a good movie - the events within the cave - are over and done with

by the time Fuller begins his piece. Moreover, these events are not depicted with

cinematic vivacity, but described after the fact with judicial precision and bland-

ness.

Fuller?s live Supreme Court justices tranquilly but rigorously show the

complexity of the facts and the flexibility of legal reasoning. The live opinions

focus on different factual details and legal precedents, and lit them into different

background structures of legal and political principle. By these means Fuller

crystallizes important conflicts of principle and illustrates the major schools of

legal philosophy in his day. Fuller?s case has been called ?a classic in jurispru-

dence,? ? a microcosm of this century?s debates,? and a ?breathtaking intellectual

accomplishment.?*

Although only half a century separates us from the date of Fuller?s essay, the

legal landscape has changed profoundly. I have written nine new judicial opin-

ions on his case, with roughly Fuller?s own objectives in view, hoping to explore

important issues of principle and in the process to bring the depiction of legal

philosophy up to date.

While I would like to depict the major schools of legal philosophy today,

giving each its due, there are a few obstacles that subtly constrain the project.

Suber, Peter. Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions.

Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, 1998. p ix.

http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cityu/Doc?id=2003075&ppg=9

Copyright ? 1998. Routledge. All rights reserved.

Preface

Introduction 1

Pt. I Lon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers 5

Opinion of Chief Justice Truepenny 7

Opinion of Justice Foster 10

Opinion of Justice Tatting 15

Opinion of Justice Keen 20

Opinion of Justice Handy 25

Opinion of Justice Tatting 31

Postscript 32

Pt. II Nine New Opinions 33

Opinion of Chief Justice Burnham 35

Opinion of Justice Springham 45

Opinion of Justice Tally 57

Opinion of Justice Hellen 64

Opinion of Justice Trumpet 73

Opinion of Justice Goad 79

Opinion of Justice Frank 89

Opinion of Justice Reckon 91

Opinion of Justice Bond 99

Index 108

具體描述

讀後感

評分

美国著名法学家富勒先生撰写的《洞穴奇案》已经成为初入法学门径的读者首选的读物之一。这本书通过精妙的安排,使得读者能够领略到法律不一样的另一面:对于一般人而言,一个行为无非就是合法与非法两种简单的选择,只要学会法律条文自然也就懂了如何做出这个看上去很简单的判...  

評分

美国著名法学家富勒先生撰写的《洞穴奇案》已经成为初入法学门径的读者首选的读物之一。这本书通过精妙的安排,使得读者能够领略到法律不一样的另一面:对于一般人而言,一个行为无非就是合法与非法两种简单的选择,只要学会法律条文自然也就懂了如何做出这个看上去很简单的判...  

評分

去年年末,美国总统选战正酣之际,我曾在报纸上看到记者对普通民众的例行采访。受访者说,要想让你的孩子当美国总统,就送他上哈佛法学院,然后给他娶个哈佛法学院毕业的妻子。当时就觉得很有趣,有点黑色幽默的味道。后来,奥巴马真的当选了,除了感受媒体对“美国梦”以及这...  

評分

評分

对于法律,我是一个间歇性业余爱好者。爱好者前加上两个限定词是为了避免万一有人要和我讨论学术。我略懂法律常识,偶尔读几本法学书,主要还是喜欢法律的逻辑和思维方式。现在我打算复述几个老掉牙的案例。 第一个: 从前有一天,两个猎人去打猎,他们可能是邻居,也可能许素...  

用戶評價

评分

但外行女心中仍有個疑問,就是撇開殺人這一事實和所有細節不說,人吃人這個情節,在人倫上難道不更搖搖欲墜?

评分

頗好讀, 但沒想像中精闢,結論顯而易見---- 大概因為我太偏激.

评分

可能是我對法理學還不熟悉吧,我覺得討論過來討論過去,隻是在文字上的辯解而已。倒是有幾個比較有意思的點:法律的目的,“故意”,可替代的方法,還有對緊急避險的討論。第十的那裏,標題是忍受不正義好過實施不正義,但我覺得我們應該把作為和不作為放在一個平等的位置上。

评分

頗好讀, 但沒想像中精闢,結論顯而易見---- 大概因為我太偏激.

评分

刑法21條的緊急避險很實用啊,法不責人所不能,至於該案不公平的問題,民法領域貌似有一條『契約自由』原則,但畢竟有罪與否還是得取決於那些前提假設條件的,當然,道德幷非構成殺人罪名的依據,同理,民衆意嚮亦非無罪的理由

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有