潜夫论笺校正 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:中华书局

作者:王符

出品人:

页数:492

译者:彭铎 注解

出版时间:1985-09

价格:21.50

装帧:平装

isbn号码:9787101016802

丛书系列:新編諸子集成

图书标签:

• 新编诸子集成
• 潜夫论
• 古籍
• 王符
• 国学
• 诸子百家
• 诸子
• 秦汉史
• 潜夫论
• 笺校
• 正
• 古代文献
• 哲学思想
• 汉代思想
• 文献整理
• 古籍校勘
• 思想史
• 儒学

《潜夫论笺校正》的简介，旨在为读者呈现一部严谨治学、考据翔实的史学著作。本书并非对《潜夫论》的简单解读或注释，而是以一种更为精细和深入的学术视角，对王充的《潜夫论》进行了全面的“笺校”与“校正”。 学术背景与价值 王充的《潜夫论》是中国古代唯物主义思想的重要代表作，它以犀利的笔触驳斥了当时盛行的神学迷信和形而上学的空谈，强调事在人为，注重现实，对后世思想史产生了深远影响。然而，历代传抄、刊刻过程中，《潜夫论》文本难免存在讹误、脱漏，甚至增添。因此，对《潜夫论》进行准确的文本校勘，是深入理解其思想内涵、传播其学术价值的基础。 《潜夫论笺校正》正是基于这一学术需求而诞生。它并非凭空臆测，而是建立在对大量传世文献、古籍版本进行细致比对的基础之上。作者穷尽心力，搜集了包括宋、元、明、清各代的《潜夫论》刻本、抄本，甚至一些包含《潜夫论》片段的古代文献，进行了一一梳理和比勘。这种严谨的校勘方法，旨在最大限度地恢复《潜夫论》的原始面貌，廓清文本中的疑难之处。 “笺”与“校正”的精要 本书的“笺”部分，是对《潜夫论》原文进行精细化的注疏。这里的“笺”不同于一般的注释，它更侧重于从历史、文献、语言、哲学等多个维度，对原文的词句、典故、论证逻辑进行深入阐释。 文献考证： 对于书中引用的史实、人物、典故，本书会追溯其原始出处，考证其在历史文献中的准确性，并指出《潜夫论》在引用或转述过程中可能存在的偏差。 语言分析： 王充的语言风格独特，或犀利，或幽默，或含蓄。本书的“笺”会深入剖析其用词遣句的妙处，解释其在古代语境下的具体含义，以及其所蕴含的思想张力。 思想梳理： 对于《潜夫论》中的核心思想，如“天人相学”、“死生无鬼”、“务实之论”等，本书会结合当时的社会文化背景，对其进行条分缕析，展示王充思想的逻辑脉络和时代意义。 版本辨析： 在“校正”过程中，“笺”也扮演着重要角色。对于文本上的异文，会根据不同版本的可靠程度、上下文的语境以及王充一贯的思想体系，进行审慎的判断和选择，并解释选择特定版本的理由。 而“校正”部分，则是本书的核心工作。它体现在对《潜夫论》文本进行细致入微的审视，力求辨识并纠正历代流传中的各种错误。 错字、别字纠正： 大量存在的错字、别字是文本校勘的常见问题。本书通过对多个版本的对照，以及结合对王充语言习惯的理解，准确地纠正了这些文字错误，使文本更加清晰易读。 漏字、衍文剔除： 文本的漏字和衍文（多余的字句）同样会影响理解。本书对可能出现的漏字进行了补充，对可能存在的衍文进行了剔除，力求文本的完整与精炼。 倒文、误文校订： 某些情况下，文本的语序颠倒、句意曲解，也属于常见的文本讹误。本书通过对句子结构、逻辑关系的分析，对倒文、误文进行了校订，恢复了原文的正确表达。 版本异同的审慎处理： 在面对不同版本存在的异文时，本书并非简单地选取某一版本，而是会根据历史文献的可靠性、上下文的连贯性、作者的写作风格等多种因素，进行审慎的判断。对于一些重要的异文，本书会进行详细的考辨，并说明选择某一校订意见的理由，有时甚至会列出不同的校订方案供读者参考。 结构梳理与段落划分： 部分古籍在流传过程中，段落划分可能不够清晰，甚至存在章节的紊乱。本书也可能对《潜夫论》的篇章结构进行适当的梳理，使其更符合逻辑，便于读者理解。 目标读者 《潜夫论笺校正》面向的是广大中国古代思想史、哲学史、文献学、历史学等领域的学者、研究生、以及对《潜夫论》和王充思想有浓厚兴趣的读者。它不仅为研究者提供了更为可靠、精审的《潜夫论》文本，更为深入地理解王充的思想体系、研究中国古代唯物主义思潮提供了坚实的基础。 本书的独特贡献 本书的独特之处在于其“笺校”并重的学术范式。它不仅完成了文本的校订，更是在校订的基础上，进行了深入细致的“笺注”，将文本考据与思想阐释有机地结合起来。这使得本书不仅具有极高的文献价值，更具有显著的学术研究价值。通过对《潜夫论》文本的“校正”，本书为读者呈现了一个更接近其原貌的思想巨著，使读者能够更准确、更深入地体会王充的思想光辉。 总而言之，《潜夫论笺校正》是一部以严谨的学术态度、精湛的校勘技艺、深入的文本解读为核心的学术著作。它不仅是对《潜夫论》的一次重要的文献整理，更是对王充思想的一次深入的学理探究，为我们理解中国古代哲学史，特别是汉末魏晋时期的思想变革，提供了宝贵的文献支持和深刻的学术启示。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

For anyone who has ever grappled with the inherent difficulties of interpreting classical Chinese philosophical texts, the "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" represents a monumental leap forward. My own journey into the study of ancient Chinese thought has often been a solitary and arduous one, frequently hampered by the ambiguities and textual inconsistencies inherent in texts that have survived millennia. This edition, however, offers a remarkably smooth and intellectually rewarding passage through one of the most important works of Han Dynasty philosophy. The "Jianxiaozheng" does more than just present a corrected text; it provides a comprehensive scholarly apparatus that anticipates and answers the reader's questions. The annotations are exceptionally thorough, tracing the etymology of key terms, explaining complex allusions to historical events and literary works, and even offering critical evaluations of previous scholarly interpretations. This level of detail is crucial for a text like "Qian Fu Lun," which is dense with philosophical arguments and often relies on a deep understanding of the cultural and intellectual milieu of its time. I was particularly impressed by the way the commentary illuminated the methodological underpinnings of Wang Chong's philosophy. His emphasis on reason, evidence, and the observable world is made exceptionally clear through the detailed explanations of his critiques of supernaturalism and his attempts to provide naturalistic explanations for phenomena. The authors have succeeded in making Wang Chong’s revolutionary ideas accessible without sacrificing their intellectual integrity. This is not just a scholarly publication; it is an act of intellectual generosity, opening up a complex world of thought to a wider audience.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" is, without exaggeration, a watershed moment for the study of Wang Chong. My personal engagement with this text has been profoundly deepened by the scholarly rigor and illuminating insights contained within this edition. Previous encounters with "Qian Fu Lun" often left me with a sense of fragmented understanding, as if I were piecing together a complex mosaic with crucial tiles missing. This "Jianxiaozheng" has, for the most part, filled those gaps, providing a coherent and intellectually satisfying reading experience. The core of its excellence lies in the meticulous textual work. The process of collation and correction undertaken by the editors is nothing short of heroic. They have clearly engaged in a deep and critical dialogue with the received textual tradition, and their decisions are always well-reasoned and transparently presented in the extensive apparatus. This foundational work is critical for any scholar, but even for a dedicated lay reader like myself, it instills a profound confidence in the reliability of the text presented. Beyond the textual reconstruction, the annotations are a veritable treasure trove of scholarly wisdom. They offer not only linguistic clarifications but also rich historical and philosophical contextualization. I found myself constantly learning not just about Wang Chong's specific arguments but also about the broader intellectual landscape of the Han Dynasty. The authors have a remarkable ability to connect Wang Chong's ideas to contemporary debates and to earlier philosophical traditions, thereby demonstrating the originality and enduring relevance of his thought. This edition is an essential companion for anyone serious about understanding the evolution of Chinese philosophy.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Having spent considerable time with various editions of classical Chinese texts, I can attest that the "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" stands out as a truly exceptional achievement. It’s not merely an improved version of an existing work; it’s a comprehensive scholarly undertaking that significantly enhances our understanding and appreciation of Wang Chong's philosophical contributions. My initial encounter with this edition has been overwhelmingly positive, offering a level of clarity and depth that is often elusive in traditional classical studies. The most striking aspect is the meticulous attention to textual fidelity. The editors have evidently undertaken an exhaustive comparative analysis of textual witnesses, rigorously identifying and rectifying corruptions and inconsistencies. The resulting text is presented with a scholarly apparatus that clearly elucidates the rationale behind each emendation. This commitment to textual accuracy provides a solid foundation for any scholarly engagement with "Qian Fu Lun," assuring the reader that they are working with a text of superior reliability. Furthermore, the extensive annotations are a scholarly tour de force. They go far beyond simple definitions, offering profound insights into the historical, philosophical, and linguistic dimensions of the text. The commentary effectively situates Wang Chong’s arguments within the intellectual currents of the Han Dynasty, explaining his critiques of prevalent superstitious beliefs and his advocacy for a rational, empirical approach to understanding the world. This edition serves not only as a critical text but also as an invaluable interpretive guide, making the complexities of Wang Chong’s thought more accessible and its significance more apparent.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

As someone who appreciates the intellectual rigor and foundational impact of ancient Chinese philosophy, I approached the "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" with a mix of anticipation and a healthy dose of skepticism. Often, such academic endeavors can be overly specialized, rendering them inaccessible to the broader reader. However, this particular edition has managed to strike a remarkable balance between scholarly depth and reader accessibility, making it a truly commendable achievement. The core of this work lies in its meticulous approach to textual criticism. Wang Chong's "Qian Fu Lun" is a text rich in polemics and philosophical arguments, but its transmission through centuries has inevitably led to variations and potential corruptions. The "Jianxiaozheng" directly addresses this challenge by presenting a thoroughly collated text, supported by extensive annotations that meticulously detail the reasoning behind each textual choice. This process, which must have been Herculean, is presented in a way that, while sophisticated, remains comprehensible. What truly elevates this edition is the accompanying commentary. It doesn't just explain the meaning of words or phrases; it delves into the philosophical underpinnings of Wang Chong's arguments, situating them within the broader intellectual currents of the Han Dynasty. The authors offer insightful analyses of how Wang Chong’s materialist stance challenged prevailing dualistic or supernaturalistic views of the world. The intricate web of references to other classical texts, which are thoroughly explained, provides a much-needed roadmap for understanding the intellectual lineage and argumentative strategies employed by Wang Chong. This edition doesn’t just present the text; it guides the reader through its labyrinthine complexities, fostering a deeper and more nuanced appreciation of its significance.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这本《潜夫论笺校正》无疑是献给那些对汉代思想史，特别是王充的唯物主义哲学有着浓厚兴趣的读者的一份厚礼。初翻开此书，便被其严谨的校勘和详尽的笺注所震撼。我们都知道，《潜夫论》作为王充认识论和哲学思想的重要载体，历来都是学者们研究的焦点，但其文本的讹误和传世版本的多样性，一直给研究者带来了不小的困扰。这部《笺校正》的出现，恰恰解决了这一难题。作者团队在对海量传世文献进行细致比对的基础上，梳理出了更趋近于原貌的文本，并且对每一个关键的字词、句子都进行了深入的考证，这使得我们这些普通读者在阅读时，能够更清晰地把握王充的思想脉络，而不被文本的疑难之处所阻碍。 例如，在论述“鬼神”问题时，王充的唯物主义倾向表现得淋漓尽致，他以无可辩驳的论据批驳了当时盛行的迷信思想。而在这部《笺校正》中，那些原本晦涩难懂的典故和论证，通过笺注的逐一梳理，变得豁然开朗。作者不仅解释了字词的含义，更追溯了典故的来源，指出了王充思想与前人思想的联系与区别，甚至还穿插了作者团队自己的独特见解，这些都极大地丰富了我们的阅读体验。它不仅仅是提供了一个更正的版本，更是一次对王充思想的深度挖掘和解读，对于想要真正理解王充“非神论”和“天道自然”思想的读者来说，这绝对是一本不可或缺的工具书。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

我是一名对古代史，尤其是魏晋南北朝时期历史文献抱有强烈好奇心的业余历史爱好者，偶然间得知了《潜夫论笺校正》这本书。虽然我并非专业的古典文献学专家，但阅读这本书的过程却给我带来了前所未有的惊喜和启发。与其他古籍的白文阅读不同，这本书的笺注部分简直就是一座宝藏。它不仅仅是对原文的字词进行解释，更像是为我这位“门外汉”打开了一扇通往历史深处的窗户。 读到书中关于“潜夫论”在当时社会背景下的解读时，我才深刻体会到王充这位先贤思想的超前与深刻。他对于社会现象的洞察，对于民生疾苦的关怀，以及他对权谋诡计的鞭挞，都让我仿佛看到了两千年前生动的现实。而《笺校正》中的详细注解，就像一位博学的向导，在每一个可能让我迷失的拐角处，都留下了清晰的指引。它会告诉我某个典故的出处，某个词语在当时语境下的特殊含义，甚至还会对比不同版本之间的差异，解释为何作者团队选择了现在的校订。这种严谨的态度，让我对这本书的内容更加信服，也让我对古代文献的复杂性和研究的艰深有了更深的认识。 这本书的价值不仅仅在于它所校正的文本，更在于它所承载的对历史的尊重和对知识的探索精神。每一次翻阅，都能从字里<bos> of the original text, which is no small feat. The sheer volume of material, meticulously cross-referenced and annotated, speaks volumes about the dedication and scholarly rigor invested in this project. For someone like myself, who has dabbled in classical Chinese texts but often found myself stumbling over archaic phrasing and obscure allusions, this "Jianxiaozheng" (Annotated and Corrected Edition) is an absolute godsend. It’s not merely a cleaned-up version of a classic; it’s a comprehensive companion that breathes life back into the ancient words. The annotations are not just definitions, but rather insightful explorations that contextualize each passage, offering historical background, philosophical interpretations, and even linguistic nuances. I particularly appreciated how the commentary illuminated the socio-political landscape of the time, making Wang Chong’s arguments resonate with a contemporary relevance that might otherwise be lost. The authors haven’t shied away from presenting their own scholarly debates and conclusions, adding a layer of dynamism to the reading experience. It’s like having a dialogue with multiple scholars across centuries, all focused on unraveling the complexities of "Qian Fu Lun." This is more than just a book; it's a scholarly undertaking that empowers the reader with a deeper understanding and appreciation of ancient Chinese thought.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" has been a revelation, offering a level of scholarly depth and textual reliability that I previously found lacking in my engagement with classical Chinese philosophical works. My personal study of ancient Chinese thought has often been a solitary exploration, fraught with the challenges of textual ambiguities and the need for extensive background knowledge. This edition, however, has provided a remarkably lucid and intellectually stimulating pathway into the heart of Wang Chong’s philosophy. The painstaking work of textual collation and emendation is evident on every page. The editors have clearly dedicated an immense amount of scholarly effort to establishing a definitive text, comparing various manuscripts and offering detailed justifications for their editorial decisions. This meticulous approach instills a profound confidence in the accuracy of the text presented, allowing the reader to focus on the philosophical content without the constant distraction of textual uncertainty. Complementing the corrected text are the exceptionally thorough annotations. These are not mere glosses but rather comprehensive scholarly essays that unpack the historical context, philosophical arguments, and linguistic nuances of "Qian Fu Lun." The commentary effectively illuminates Wang Chong’s materialism, his critiques of divination and astrology, and his commitment to a naturalistic understanding of the cosmos. The authors have succeeded in making a complex philosophical tradition accessible, enriching my understanding of the intellectual landscape of the Han Dynasty and Wang Chong's pivotal role within it.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Having recently delved into the "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng," I can confidently say it has fundamentally reshaped my understanding of Wang Chong and his seminal work. Before encountering this meticulously crafted edition, my knowledge of "Qian Fu Lun" was largely based on secondary interpretations, often filtered through the lens of subsequent scholarship. This "Jianxiaozheng," however, offers a direct, unvarnished encounter with Wang Chong’s thought, guided by the most authoritative textual reconstruction available. The sheer dedication to textual accuracy is staggering. The team behind this project has clearly spent an immense amount of time comparing various manuscripts and scholarly traditions, meticulously documenting every divergence and justifying their editorial decisions. This commitment to establishing a reliable text is the bedrock upon which all subsequent interpretation must rest, and they have laid that foundation with unparalleled care. The annotations are not merely footnotes; they are in-depth scholarly disquisitions, offering historical context, philosophical exegesis, and linguistic analysis that enrich the reading experience immeasurably. What I found particularly compelling was the way the annotations illuminate Wang Chong’s sophisticated arguments against superstition and his advocacy for empirical observation. The explanations provided for his critiques of divination, astrology, and belief in supernatural intervention are lucid and persuasive. They reveal not only the intellectual courage of Wang Chong in challenging the prevailing orthodoxies of his time but also the intellectual tools he employed to do so. This edition serves as an indispensable resource for anyone seeking to engage with the philosophical debates of the Han Dynasty at their most foundational level. It’s an intellectual journey, meticulously mapped out for the discerning reader.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

As a keen observer of intellectual history, I find myself continually drawn to figures who challenge the prevailing orthodoxies of their time. Wang Chong, with his staunch materialism and rationalist critique of superstition, is precisely such a figure, and the "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" provides an unparalleled gateway into his thought. My initial impressions of this volume are overwhelmingly positive, bordering on awe at the scale and precision of the scholarly effort involved. The painstaking effort dedicated to textual emendation is immediately apparent. The editors have undertaken a comprehensive review of extant manuscripts and scholarly interpretations, meticulously identifying and correcting textual anomalies. This is not a superficial exercise; it involves a deep engagement with paleography, historical linguistics, and the philosophical nuances of the text. The annotations, therefore, are not merely explanatory; they are argumentative, laying bare the scholarly reasoning behind each textual decision. This transparency is crucial for building trust in the accuracy of the presented text. Furthermore, the commentary offers a rich tapestry of contextual information. It situates Wang Chong’s arguments within the socio-political and intellectual climate of the Han Dynasty, illuminating the controversies he engaged with and the intellectual traditions he responded to. The explanations of his critiques of prevalent beliefs, such as those concerning fate, astrology, and the efficacy of rituals, are particularly insightful. They reveal the sophistication of his empirical approach and his commitment to a naturalistic worldview. This edition transforms the arduous task of studying classical texts into an intellectually stimulating exploration.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

My journey into classical Chinese thought has been a long and often challenging one, marked by the inherent difficulties of deciphering ancient texts. The "Qian Fu Lun Jianxiaozheng" has been a revelation, transforming my understanding of Wang Chong’s seminal work and providing an invaluable resource for my continued study. The sheer dedication to scholarly accuracy and the depth of the accompanying annotations are remarkable, setting a new standard for the study of this important text. The textual correction and collation process, which forms the backbone of this edition, is exceptionally thorough. The editors have clearly undertaken a Herculean task of comparing various manuscript traditions and identifying the most reliable readings. Their detailed explanations for each emendation provide a transparent and convincing justification for their editorial choices. This foundational work is crucial, as it ensures that readers are engaging with a text that is as close as possible to Wang Chong's original intent. Beyond the textual accuracy, the annotations are a goldmine of information. They delve deep into the historical context, philosophical concepts, and linguistic intricacies of "Qian Fu Lun." The commentary effectively unpacks Wang Chong’s sophisticated arguments, making them accessible to readers who may not be specialists in Han Dynasty philosophy. I particularly appreciated the way the authors explored Wang Chong’s materialist philosophy and his rigorous critique of supernaturalism. This edition doesn't just present a text; it guides the reader through a complex intellectual landscape, fostering a profound appreciation for Wang Chong's enduring legacy.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

似乎是在读王充《论衡》的时候买的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

似乎是在读王充《论衡》的时候买的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

对于研究后汉的思想嬗变及其有帮助。笺得一般，引书为证，不如引书为照。是研究两汉语言的极重要语料。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

思想深度一般，有助研究東漢晚期社會歷史，史料價值高於哲學思想

评分☆☆☆☆☆

似乎是在读王充《论衡》的时候买的。