司徒安,纽约大学人类学与宗教研究副教授。主要研究领域为人类学、中国文化史及宗教研究。拍摄纪录片《水书》(2012)。合编Body, Subject and Power in China, DV-Made China: Digital Subjects and Social Transformations after Independent Film。她的个人网页为www.angelazito.com。
乾隆皇帝在1736年到1795年间统治着中国,他位居典礼活动构成的网络中心。这些帝国礼仪旨在通过身体实践,以有形的方式呈现支撑帝国社会的形而上学。本书是第一步完整论述乾隆皇帝和文人官员共同生产的"仪式化权力"的著作。作者打破传统范畴,巧妙地结合了人类学、后结构主义分析、表演理论、历史学和宗教学等领域的研究方法,通过一种批判性的文化史研究,阐释了18世纪中国的权力生产和现代史学家借以研究中国的概念范畴。
After writing my comments I referred to some reviews, whose compliments of this books really surprised me. Probably I haven’t obtained the ability to understand this book, given its rich theoretical backgrounds, but I’m sure this study brings pain for ord...
评分After writing my comments I referred to some reviews, whose compliments of this books really surprised me. Probably I haven’t obtained the ability to understand this book, given its rich theoretical backgrounds, but I’m sure this study brings pain for ord...
评分After writing my comments I referred to some reviews, whose compliments of this books really surprised me. Probably I haven’t obtained the ability to understand this book, given its rich theoretical backgrounds, but I’m sure this study brings pain for ord...
评分After writing my comments I referred to some reviews, whose compliments of this books really surprised me. Probably I haven’t obtained the ability to understand this book, given its rich theoretical backgrounds, but I’m sure this study brings pain for ord...
评分After writing my comments I referred to some reviews, whose compliments of this books really surprised me. Probably I haven’t obtained the ability to understand this book, given its rich theoretical backgrounds, but I’m sure this study brings pain for ord...
张文豪出品,当然满分!
评分三星半。将礼作为一种话语,包含了“仪式化”这个组成部分,强调主体生产和由此流转的意义。部分视角蛮有启发,但整个的思路及要解决的相应问题还是有些拎不清。
评分关于古代中国,礼是非常值得研究的一个话题。作者搜集了许多文献,可能由于资料整合,以及作者想处理的问题太多,使文章显得有些碎片化,有些凌乱,但用心慢慢看还是有思路预设其中的。
评分福柯/葛兰西的信徒,仪式政治的延续。人类学如此大张旗鼓的进入清代上层政治研究领域还是头一次见,勉强也算得上新清史研究的一种吧(虽然貌合神离)。结尾中对“文化霸权”的引介,倒可以充作《刻画战勋》的注脚。前半部分还好,后半部分莫名其妙。
评分福柯/葛兰西的信徒,仪式政治的延续。人类学如此大张旗鼓的进入清代上层政治研究领域还是头一次见,勉强也算得上新清史研究的一种吧(虽然貌合神离)。结尾中对“文化霸权”的引介,倒可以充作《刻画战勋》的注脚。前半部分还好,后半部分莫名其妙。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有