Tying the Autocrat's Hands

Tying the Autocrat's Hands pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

Yuhua Wang (王裕华) is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. His articles have appeared in the China Journal, the China Review, the China Quarterly, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, the Journal of Peking University (Beijing Daxue Xuebao), and Studies in Comparative International Development. He is a frequent commentator on political developments in China and has been featured in the New York Times, Reuters, and South China Morning Post, as well as on CNN and DR (the Danish Broadcasting Corporation).

出版者:Cambridge University Press
作者:Wang Yuhua
出品人:
页数:216
译者:
出版时间:2014-12-18
价格:USD 90.00
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9781107071742
丛书系列:Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
图书标签:
  • 政治学 
  • 中国政治 
  • 海外中国研究 
  • 威权主义 
  • 法治 
  • 法学 
  • 比较政治 
  • 王玉华 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小哈图书下载中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

Under what conditions would authoritarian rulers be interested in the rule of law? What type of rule of law exists in authoritarian regimes? How do authoritarian rulers promote the rule of law without threatening their grip on power? Tying the Autocrat's Hands answers these questions by examining legal reforms in China. Yuhua Wang develops a demand-side theory arguing that authoritarian rulers will respect the rule of law when they need the cooperation of organized interest groups that control valuable and mobile assets but are not politically connected. He also defines the rule of law that exists in authoritarian regimes as a partial form of the rule of law, in which judicial fairness is respected in the commercial realm but not in the political realm. Tying the Autocrat's Hands demonstrates that the rule of law is better enforced in regions with a large number of foreign investors but less so in regions heavily invested in by Chinese investors.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

加一星给卡夫卡 难得(也难看)的是作者作为一个北大背景的学者居然提供了这么一个头脑简单的答案

评分

加一星给卡夫卡 难得(也难看)的是作者作为一个北大背景的学者居然提供了这么一个头脑简单的答案

评分

非常紧凑小巧的研究,相比之下我的博论实在太散漫无章了..

评分

略失望,为何政治学还钟情现代化理论(作为靶子),因为inference的限制不能讲更精细的故事了吗?

评分

略失望,为何政治学还钟情现代化理论(作为靶子),因为inference的限制不能讲更精细的故事了吗?

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有