Nietzsche wrote in a scientific culture transformed by Darwin. He read extensively in German and British Darwinists, and his own works dealt often with such obvious Darwinian themes as struggle and evolution. Yet most of what Nietzsche said about Darwin was hostile: he sharply attacked many of his ideas, and often slurred Darwin himself as mediocre. So most readers of Nietzsche have inferred that he must have cast Darwin quite aside. But in fact, John Richardson argues, Nietzsche was deeply and pervasively influenced by Darwin. He stressed his disagreements, but was silent about several core points he took over from Darwin Moreover, Richardson claims, these Darwinian borrowings were to Nietzsches credit: when we bring them to the surface we discover his positions to be much stronger than we had thought. Even Nietzsches radical innovations are more plausible when we expose their Darwinian ground; we see that they amount to a new Darwinism.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
條理清晰。並非簡單拿尼采思想與達爾文（主義）比較一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反達爾文的論辯生發齣對人類價值演進的社會選擇解釋，將其與自然選擇的邏輯區分開，糾正瞭舊的達爾文主義，成為“模因”理論的先聲。這兩種選擇所塑造的價值的衝突是尼采要醫治的人之病癥，而齣路在於真正的“自我選擇”。
评分條理清晰。並非簡單拿尼采思想與達爾文（主義）比較一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反達爾文的論辯生發齣對人類價值演進的社會選擇解釋，將其與自然選擇的邏輯區分開，糾正瞭舊的達爾文主義，成為“模因”理論的先聲。這兩種選擇所塑造的價值的衝突是尼采要醫治的人之病癥，而齣路在於真正的“自我選擇”。
评分條理清晰。並非簡單拿尼采思想與達爾文（主義）比較一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反達爾文的論辯生發齣對人類價值演進的社會選擇解釋，將其與自然選擇的邏輯區分開，糾正瞭舊的達爾文主義，成為“模因”理論的先聲。這兩種選擇所塑造的價值的衝突是尼采要醫治的人之病癥，而齣路在於真正的“自我選擇”。
评分條理清晰。並非簡單拿尼采思想與達爾文（主義）比較一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反達爾文的論辯生發齣對人類價值演進的社會選擇解釋，將其與自然選擇的邏輯區分開，糾正瞭舊的達爾文主義，成為“模因”理論的先聲。這兩種選擇所塑造的價值的衝突是尼采要醫治的人之病癥，而齣路在於真正的“自我選擇”。
评分條理清晰。並非簡單拿尼采思想與達爾文（主義）比較一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反達爾文的論辯生發齣對人類價值演進的社會選擇解釋，將其與自然選擇的邏輯區分開，糾正瞭舊的達爾文主義，成為“模因”理論的先聲。這兩種選擇所塑造的價值的衝突是尼采要醫治的人之病癥，而齣路在於真正的“自我選擇”。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有