First published in 2000, Dipesh Chakrabarty's influential "Provincializing Europe" addresses the mythical figure of Europe that is often taken to be the original site of modernity in many histories of capitalist transition in non-Western countries. This imaginary Europe, Dipesh Chakrabarty argues, is built into the social sciences. The very idea of historicizing carries with it some peculiarly European assumptions about disenchanted space, secular time, and sovereignty. Measured against such mythical standards, capitalist transition in the third world has often seemed either incomplete or lacking. "Provincializing Europe" proposes that every case of transition to capitalism is a case of translation as well - a translation of existing worlds and their thought - categories into the categories and self-understandings of capitalist modernity. Now featuring a new preface in which Chakrabarty responds to his critics, this book globalizes European thought by exploring how it may be renewed both for and from the margins.
Dipesh Chakrabarty holds a B.Sc (Physics Hons.) degree from Presidency College, University of Calcutta, a Post-graduate Diploma in Management (considered equivalent to MBA) from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, and a Ph.D (History) from the Australian National University. He is currently the Lawrence A. Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor in History, South Asian Languages and Civilizations, and the College. He is also a Faculty Fellow of the Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory, an Associate Faculty of the Department of English, holds a visiting position at the Research School of Humanities at the Australian National University, and an Honorary Professorial Fellowship with the School of Historical Studies at the University of Melbourne, Australia . He is a founding member of the editorial collective of Subaltern Studies, a co-editor of Critical Inquiry, and a founding editor of Postcolonial Studies. He is a Contributing Editor to Public Culture, and has served on the editorial boards of the American Historical Review. He is one of the editors (along with Sheldon Pollock from Columbia University and Sanjay Subrahmanyam from UCLA) of the new series South Asia Across the Disciplines published by a consortium of three university presses (Chicago, Columbia, and California). He also serves on the Board of Experts for the Humboldt Forum in Berlin.
评分
评分
评分
评分
个别地方有些费解,但整体上能明白作者的观点,有机会要把整本书都读了。为什么印度的学者能有这样反思现代性的作品,而中国学者多是拾人牙慧呢?
评分过一会把书评补上
评分除了后面几章全都是在讲印度都挺好的。。。值得一看的书
评分读了preface和introduction部分,很有方法论上的启发。一方面思考当代印度无法脱离西方话语,另一方面它又是不充分的。从Belgia农民可以看到所谓政治现代性的复杂与多样性。印度学界在长期以来也受到马克思主义的统治,或隐或显。更有意思的是历史主义和后殖民思考之间的关系,作者特别强调历史主义的思维范式,认为无论是19世纪的自由主义还是马克思主义思想,其底蕴都是历史主义式的。所以对殖民的批判也一定要牵扯到对历史主义的批判。作者从海德格尔那里借鉴了很多资源,这破值得玩味。
评分Only introduction and epilogue; need to revisit in the future. Critique of historicism or linear historicism?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有