Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
社会现象不同于自然现象,因为有了人的参与。人可以弄清楚自然界的运行规律,却很难弄清楚由人所组成的社会的运行规律。而这就给各种社会理论提供了无限的发挥空间,于是乎,解释社会发展的理论就多如牛毛,只要言之成理,不同人们的常识和逻辑严重违背,都会有自己的拥护...
評分 評分 評分 評分在当今的世界,每个国家都在通过自己所控制的资源(如课堂教育和宣传),在本地区传统的宗教、语言和部族等基础上,来打造诸如“法兰西民族”、“大和民族”、“美利坚民族”或“德意志民族”等等观念。用社会学术语来说,我们可以把这些观念称为“想象的共同体”。这一“想象...
梯利觀點極易被簡化,遺憾。歐洲戰爭和軍事演變觸發權力嚮國傢的集中。強製和資本在辯證關係中相互促進,使得民間武裝逐漸成為國傢暴力,租-貢關係逐漸變成財政係統。意外後果是國傢將國民同質化,國傢-社會關係變得更為直接,社會運動和公民權利興起。強製-資本的組閤與邏輯解釋歐洲國傢殊途同歸
评分Tilly的研究堪稱該領域的典範,但相比韋伯和福柯的研究,還是顯得單薄。現代國傢要比這個金鐵主義的圖景豐富得多。
评分不大感興趣的題材
评分這個模式被用來解釋戰國到秦漢的政治格局
评分not so coherent as works of Anderson, Mann, and Moore.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有