Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Pamela Kyle Crossley

University of California Press

2006-1-19

378

USD 68.95

Hardcover

Studies on China (UC Press)

9780520230156

圖書標籤: 海外中國研究曆史邊疆史蕭鳳霞新清史清史柯嬌燕美國漢學

喜歡 Empire at the Margins 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-11-05

Empire at the Margins epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.

Empire at the Margins 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.

圖書目錄

Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Five stars for providing me with relatively objective views on groups known as Zhuang,Miao and Yao today !

評分☆☆☆☆☆

沒想到連這種書的書評都會被豆娘審查......

評分☆☆☆☆☆

本書核心問題似是由primordialism/constructivism之爭引齣，然後將這個問題延伸到清史領域，用歐立德的話說，如果民族認同是一種文化構建，那麼這個構建並不一定隻能建立在現代工業的基礎上，這個政治過程在帝國體係裏是怎麼進行的？本書多強調國傢自上而下的民族劃分/構建。八旗作為身份認同的製度載體，使得滿漢即使在本身性質已經和清初完全不同之後仍然保留著特殊的認同；濛古的身份構建則強調清/東濛與西濛之間的衝突過程，以及黃金傢族作為構建核心的象徵地位；清廷對漢迴的模糊態度關係到其身份的語義混亂；西疆則不同，是“有中國特色的帝國主義”，indirect rule在此體現最為明顯，因此在20世紀前突厥並沒有統一的民族認同。當然前工業時代民族認同是精英階層的，但作為現代民族的基礎未嘗不可？

評分☆☆☆☆☆

現在迴頭來看這本書最大的意義（和尷尬）可能就在於它公開反映瞭Elliott和Crossley在ethnicity這個概念上的分歧 Elliott的第一篇和Corssley的第二篇采用瞭完全不同的概念前者認為manchu ethnicity在清代前期就存在經過18世紀清廷對banner的重整而徹底固定後者認為ethnicity（在序言裏也強調瞭）本身就帶有邊緣性這些內涵因此滿漢濛這些在19世紀末之前統統不能算是ethnic 往大瞭說 Criossley強調清朝是universalism 而Elliott更強調所謂滿洲和內亞其實Crossley本應該和中國學者的觀點更相似但是目前來看她好像為新清史背的鍋更多。。。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

評分☆☆☆☆☆