Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Pamela Kyle Crossley

University of California Press

2006-1-19

378

USD 68.95

Hardcover

Studies on China (UC Press)

9780520230156

圖書標籤: 海外中國研究曆史邊疆史蕭鳳霞新清史清史柯嬌燕美國漢學

喜歡 Empire at the Margins 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-05-28

Empire at the Margins epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.

Empire at the Margins 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.

圖書目錄

Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

一切國傢建構史都可以成為徵服史，自古以來是一傢的花可能都是野花！

評分☆☆☆☆☆

有幾章很有趣，比如lipman關於Sino-Muslim的。後麵西南地區的幾章略水。主要都是focus在清朝早期，所以論點難免有點片麵。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

現在迴頭來看這本書最大的意義（和尷尬）可能就在於它公開反映瞭Elliott和Crossley在ethnicity這個概念上的分歧 Elliott的第一篇和Corssley的第二篇采用瞭完全不同的概念前者認為manchu ethnicity在清代前期就存在經過18世紀清廷對banner的重整而徹底固定後者認為ethnicity（在序言裏也強調瞭）本身就帶有邊緣性這些內涵因此滿漢濛這些在19世紀末之前統統不能算是ethnic 往大瞭說 Criossley強調清朝是universalism 而Elliott更強調所謂滿洲和內亞其實Crossley本應該和中國學者的觀點更相似但是目前來看她好像為新清史背的鍋更多。。。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

新清史搭起演武颱，若看過專著則大部分篇章可略讀。結尾一章亦有全書要害句：當代中國在族群關係上試圖有如帝國般包羅萬有、又有如民族國傢般無縫融閤。科大衛劉誌偉肖鳳霞等華南學派其實路子不同，尤其宗族血緣概念和發掘地方資料的方式與皇廷中央劃分族群文化生活方式概念與手段距離尚遠，硬拗一起略奇葩。似乎暗指帝國之權力中心在皇廷，然帝國之天下認知、自我認同，構成帝國必要成分之對疆界無限拓展的探索，則端賴核心族群自我定位，邊陲地區如何根據地方知識、文化生活方式、體型特徵、史上與中央之戰和關係和是否接受皇帝之天下共主地位而劃分族群，將其納入帝國圖景中，反饋又加強帝國之地理和治術多元性。清代於明/漢為他者異族，但在占據中原之後又開拓四方邊疆而重構瞭漢/中國之概念。然帝國隻在開拓邊疆劃分族群之際凸顯其帝國性麼？

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Five stars for providing me with relatively objective views on groups known as Zhuang,Miao and Yao today !

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

評分☆☆☆☆☆