This book introduces one of the most powerful tools of modern economics to a wide audience: those who will later construct or consume game-theoretic models. Robert Gibbons addresses scholars in applied fields within economics who want a serious and thorough discussion of game theory but who may have found other works overly abstract. Gibbons emphasizes the economic applications of the theory at least as much as the pure theory itself; formal arguments about abstract games play a minor role. The applications illustrate the process of model building--of translating an informal description of a multi-person decision situation into a formal game-theoretic problem to be analyzed. Also, the variety of applications shows that similar issues arise in different areas of economics, and that the same game-theoretic tools can be applied in each setting. In order to emphasize the broad potential scope of the theory, conventional applications from industrial organization have been largely replaced by applications from labor, macro, and other applied fields in economics. The book covers four classes of games, and four corresponding notions of equilibrium: static games of complete information and Nash equilibrium, dynamic games of complete information and subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, static games of incomplete information and Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and dynamic games of incomplete information and perfect Bayesian equilibrium.
Robert Gibbons
Sloan Distinguished Professor of Organizational Economics and Strategy
Sloan School and Department of Economics
(看见有人求评论,我这里再把我对这本书中文译本的评论转贴一下。很久以前写下的,也没有修改过,大家凑合着看看。相关链接:http://www.douban.com/review/2469417/) 关于博弈论教材的总论请参考 http://www.douban.com/note/62777167/。 下面是对这本书单独的一点评论。 ...
評分全书内容很简单,只需要简单的概率论即可。 博弈论的介绍很不全面,只介绍了static/dynamic case with complete/incomplete information,对于很多经典的内容都没有涉及,比如knowlodge等等,仅仅适合初学者。 初学的时候也许有的价值,但要深入研究博弈论的话,这本书不值得...
評分字句词汇因为没对照读过,就提一个明显读不通的地方。主要是公式错误。 第5页图1.1.3应为: 参与人 1 上 | 1,0 | 1, 2| 第12页第一个公式p应为P,第13页倒数第七行亦如此。 第17页公式下一行“只限于”/“情况”应为“反映了”/“程度”。 第59页第十行$h_j$应为$h_i$,...
評分 評分说是说基础,但是感觉读下去还是挺难的,需要较强的推理和记忆能力,不过一般人还是可以理解一半内容的,例如怎样算比较简单的三阶纳什均衡点之类的,所以值得一看。 对于博弈论入门强力推荐哦。 不够字数不够字数不够字数
挺不錯的,配閤張維迎那邊書看看,張那本書雖有較多抄襲嫌疑,不過還是有些點睛之筆的,本來gibbons沒講透的地方在張的書中都能得到解答
评分interesting
评分我教授說tedious and unnecessary,但是這正是我需要的。
评分挺不錯的,配閤張維迎那邊書看看,張那本書雖有較多抄襲嫌疑,不過還是有些點睛之筆的,本來gibbons沒講透的地方在張的書中都能得到解答
评分雖說讀過Primer 的中文譯本,復習的話還是用英文版吧...雖說最後還是有題木有做齣來...
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有