圖書標籤: 基督教  曆史  Christianity  理論基礎  文化探討  中世紀  westart  relig   

喜歡 Christian Materiality 的讀者還喜歡

Bynum這本書精彩極瞭，副標題雖為essay，卻是當今少有的具備理論推進意識的大局觀研究。雖然Bynum強調她的曆史化分析和現代理論之間的區彆，個人倒是認為，這本書裏諸多關於材料的思考對現當代藝術的理論和實踐都有很強的參照意義，甚至比很多當代分析本身都切中要害。

Bynum這本書精彩極瞭，副標題雖為essay，卻是當今少有的具備理論推進意識的大局觀研究。雖然Bynum強調她的曆史化分析和現代理論之間的區彆，個人倒是認為，這本書裏諸多關於材料的思考對現當代藝術的理論和實踐都有很強的參照意義，甚至比很多當代分析本身都切中要害。

有趣的點有很多，看瞭這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白瞭Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一點就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.

有趣的點有很多，看瞭這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白瞭Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一點就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.

有趣的點有很多，看瞭這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白瞭Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一點就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.