In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
你可以把这本书看成一个教程。 观察下来,有效。 有几个地方更需要注意: 1. 尽量观察那些存活了五十年以上的组织。 2. 这些组织,也符合本书的规则,但更高效,所以延续更久,矛盾解决更好。 3. 昙花一现式的组织,其实不需要太在意的。胡人无百年之国运,但满清也破了此例,...
评分据作者称支撑“选择人理论”的数理模型都在《政治生存的逻辑》一书里,本书仅是个面向普通人的入门通俗读物,所以这书的理论看起来非常粗略框架,基本上摈除了宗教、意识形态、传统文化习俗什么的影响,更丝毫不扯伟光正的理想和道统,纯从群体社会中个人的“政治生存直觉”出...
评分 评分给大家个数据,应该叫有影响力集团还是致胜联盟大家自己思考吧。(以下均复制网络http://t.m.youth.cn/transfer/index/url/mip.youth.cn/sz/201710/t20171024_10910065.htm) 关于中央委员会的具体人数,中共党章无硬性规定。相关条款指出:中央委员会委员和候补委员的名额,由...
评分你可以把这本书看成一个教程。 观察下来,有效。 有几个地方更需要注意: 1. 尽量观察那些存活了五十年以上的组织。 2. 这些组织,也符合本书的规则,但更高效,所以延续更久,矛盾解决更好。 3. 昙花一现式的组织,其实不需要太在意的。胡人无百年之国运,但满清也破了此例,...
书评已发:《放诸古今皆准的权力规则》
评分获取控制权并保持住,政治的首要目的。抓住少数关键人物的支持并使得这些支持者处于忠诚,需要高超的手段控制实际结盟者的数目,人数小到随时可以替换,大数到可以完全控制。而名义结盟者,越多越好。政治是少数人的游戏,这个游戏的风险和收益巨大,而博弈的结果并不会一定导向经济效率高的均衡或是居民普惠的政策。政治人物首先迎合的便是结盟者,而居民始终是最后一位,尽管名义上是第一位。善治依赖于大的权力联盟,即长官不能通过赢取少数人的支持保持领导位置。
评分用一种简单模型(interchangeable, influential, essential)去替代另一种简单模型(民主vs独裁),然后生搬硬套。废话太多,车轱辘话来回说,最后我就只看看每章最后的总结。举了不少例子但分析太浅且牵强。最有趣的是,中国和新加坡的成功被作者称为“例外”,然后干脆就不讨论了!
评分《傲娇小独裁养成手册》 (于是我上了这课的最大感受就是卡扎菲年轻时很萌……么)
评分用一种简单模型(interchangeable, influential, essential)去替代另一种简单模型(民主vs独裁),然后生搬硬套。废话太多,车轱辘话来回说,最后我就只看看每章最后的总结。举了不少例子但分析太浅且牵强。最有趣的是,中国和新加坡的成功被作者称为“例外”,然后干脆就不讨论了!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有