James C. Scott is Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Programme, Yale University, and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
For two thousand years the disparate groups that now reside in Zomia (a mountainous region the size of Europe that consists of portions of seven Asian countries) have fled the projects of the organized state societies that surround them?slavery, conscription, taxes, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare. This book, essentially an ?anarchist history,? is the first-ever examination of the huge literature on state-making whose author evaluates why people would deliberately and reactively remain stateless. Among the strategies employed by the people of Zomia to remain stateless are physical dispersion in rugged terrain; agricultural practices that enhance mobility; pliable ethnic identities; devotion to prophetic, millenarian leaders; and maintenance of a largely oral culture that allows them to reinvent their histories and genealogies as they move between and around states.
In accessible language, James Scott, recognized worldwide as an eminent authority in Southeast Asian, peasant, and agrarian studies, tells the story of the peoples of Zomia and their unlikely odyssey in search of self-determination. He redefines our views on Asian politics, history, demographics, and even our fundamental ideas about what constitutes civilization, and challenges us with a radically different approach to history that presents events from the perspective of stateless peoples and redefines state-making as a form of ?internal colonialism.? This new perspective requires a radical reevaluation of the civilizational narratives of the lowland states. Scott?s work on Zomia represents a new way to think of area studies that will be applicable to other runaway, fugitive, and marooned communities, be they Gypsies, Cossacks, tribes fleeing slave raiders, Marsh Arabs, or San-Bushmen.
我们日常所惯用的概念经常会误导人。例如说到“国家”,我们的自然反应便会以为那是像我们眼下所熟知的那种,在固定领土疆界内的排他性政治实体,没有任何非国家行为体可以和它争夺对人民的支配权。但这倒不如说是现代产生的一种特殊情形,在历史上大部分时期的大部分地区,情...
評分 評分 評分 評分自国家诞生以来的文明历史上,国家和建立国家的民族一直是历史书写的主体和基本单位。国家、文明、历史,三者搅和在了一起。而这种文明史的一个组成部分就是,“有历史的人群”为“没有历史的人群”书写历史,并且最初当然是作为统治权延伸的附属记录来编制。与之相对,以种种...
人類學傢們前赴後繼,造齣Zomia和Zomia+,不知道的還以為是中國産的新型手機要跟iPhone x plus 一決高下呢。Scott此書一齣,Journal of Global History甚至發專刊討論。可惜愚公移瞭山,智叟po瞭張跟山遺址的閤影搶風頭,van Schendel肯定在傢哭吧。
评分非常喜歡這種無政府主義的態度,喜歡這種人類學理路的底層視角。寫作風格不算好,囉裏囉嗦很難讀,用詞也很奇葩。
评分教授今天還送瞭我一本
评分滿足瞭我那顆共産主義和國際主義的內心的同時,鞭笞瞭那顆脆弱的無政府主義的小心髒。
评分西南研究不得不看。略讀加精讀,兩天總算搞定,關於高地社會族群認同bandwidth的討論非常有趣。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有