圖書標籤: 民主轉型 民主崩潰 民主化 比較政治 政治學 資本主義 英文原版書 英文原版
发表于2024-11-25
The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
"A rich collection of challenging studies that, in addition ot supplying useful data on the performance of democratic institutions in a variety of settings, gives us a good example of how collaborative, cross-national explanatory research can be conducted." -- Journal of Politics
Juan José Linz (24 December 1926 – 1 October 2013) was a Spanish sociologist and political scientist. He was Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Yale University and an honorary member of the Scientific Council at the Juan March Institute. He is best known for his theories on totalitarian and authoritarian systems of government.
Linz was born in Bonn, Germany. In addition to his work on systems of government, he did extensive research on the breakdowns of democracy and the transition back to a democratic regime. He is the author of many works on the subject, including Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, co-authored with Alfred Stepan), his seminal work Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Rienner, 2000) and his influential essay 'The Perils of Presidentialism'.
Alfred Stepan is Wallace Sayre Professor of Government, the founding Director of the Center for the Study of Democracy, Toleration, and Religion (CDTR), and the Co-Director of the Institute for Religion, Culture, and Public Life (IRCPL). In 2012 he was the recipient of the Karl Deutsch Award of the International Political Science Association. The last three recipients of this award were Juan J. Linz (2003), Charles Tilly (2006), and Giovanni Sartori (2009).
Previously, Stepan was the founding Rector and President of Central European University in Budapest, Prague, and Warsaw, the former Director of the Concilium on International and Area Studies at Yale University, and Dean of the School of International Affairs at Columbia University. Stepan was also Gladstone Professor of Government at the University of Oxford and a Fellow Of All Souls College, Oxford.
Stepan's teaching and research interests include comparative politics, theories of democratic transitions, federalism, and the world's religious systems and democracy. In recent years, Stepan has conducted field research in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Egypt, Tunisia, India, Brazil, Israel, and Palestine, among other countries. Stepan’s publications in the last three years include Crafting State Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies, with Juan J. Linz and Yogendra Yadav; “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States” with Juan J. Linz in Perspectives on Politics (December 2011); “Tunisia’s Transition and the Twin Tolerations” in Journal of Democracy (April 2012); ““Rituals of Respect: Sufis and Secularists in Senegal in Comparative Perspective” in Comparative Politics (July 2012) “ Democratization Theory and the ‘Arab Spring’”, Journal of Democracy ( April 2013), (with Linz), “Democratic Parliamentary Monarchies, ” Journal of Democracy ( April 2014), ( with Linz and Minoves),and the co-editorship of Democracy& Islam in Indonesia (with Mirjam Künkler), Boundaries of Toleration ( with Charles Taylor), and Democracy, Islam and Secularism: Turkey in Comparative Perspective ( with Ahmet Kuru).
Some of his other books include Arguing Comparative Politics (Oxford 2001);Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, with J. J. Linz (Johns Hopkins 1996);Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone (Princeton 1988); The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, edited with Juan J. Linz (Johns Hopkins 1978); The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective(Princeton 1978); and The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil(Princeton 1971).
非常經典,堪稱是該領域開山之作。 民主崩潰一定存在結構性因素,但是社會-經濟結構性因素本身無法完備地解釋民主崩潰的機製,因為許多民主崩潰往往是政治領域的錯誤選擇的後果。林茨認為民主危機的誕生往往肇始於“不可解決的問題”的齣現和政治精英半忠誠行為的蔓延,這一洞見即便在如今看來也是很有意義的。 書中涉及到很多概念,畢竟林茨是這個領域的開創者。現在來看可能會認為沒有定量分析削弱瞭本書的可信度,但在我看來林茨所涉獵的話題恰恰是需要歸納式的定性分析。民主崩潰和重建是一個過程,我們首先需要好的理論和概念。 幾乎所有的民主崩潰都來自於政治精英錯誤的選擇,無論這些選擇是否受限於結構性背景。這是最令人哀嘆的一點:民主衰亡不是不可避免,其不可避免的預期使其真正不可避免。 要和同係列其他案例分析書一起看。
評分經典的民主崩潰理論分析
評分非常經典,堪稱是該領域開山之作。 民主崩潰一定存在結構性因素,但是社會-經濟結構性因素本身無法完備地解釋民主崩潰的機製,因為許多民主崩潰往往是政治領域的錯誤選擇的後果。林茨認為民主危機的誕生往往肇始於“不可解決的問題”的齣現和政治精英半忠誠行為的蔓延,這一洞見即便在如今看來也是很有意義的。 書中涉及到很多概念,畢竟林茨是這個領域的開創者。現在來看可能會認為沒有定量分析削弱瞭本書的可信度,但在我看來林茨所涉獵的話題恰恰是需要歸納式的定性分析。民主崩潰和重建是一個過程,我們首先需要好的理論和概念。 幾乎所有的民主崩潰都來自於政治精英錯誤的選擇,無論這些選擇是否受限於結構性背景。這是最令人哀嘆的一點:民主衰亡不是不可避免,其不可避免的預期使其真正不可避免。 要和同係列其他案例分析書一起看。
評分經典的民主崩潰理論分析
評分非常經典,堪稱是該領域開山之作。 民主崩潰一定存在結構性因素,但是社會-經濟結構性因素本身無法完備地解釋民主崩潰的機製,因為許多民主崩潰往往是政治領域的錯誤選擇的後果。林茨認為民主危機的誕生往往肇始於“不可解決的問題”的齣現和政治精英半忠誠行為的蔓延,這一洞見即便在如今看來也是很有意義的。 書中涉及到很多概念,畢竟林茨是這個領域的開創者。現在來看可能會認為沒有定量分析削弱瞭本書的可信度,但在我看來林茨所涉獵的話題恰恰是需要歸納式的定性分析。民主崩潰和重建是一個過程,我們首先需要好的理論和概念。 幾乎所有的民主崩潰都來自於政治精英錯誤的選擇,無論這些選擇是否受限於結構性背景。這是最令人哀嘆的一點:民主衰亡不是不可避免,其不可避免的預期使其真正不可避免。 要和同係列其他案例分析書一起看。
評分
評分
評分
評分
The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024