Nassim Nicholas Taleb spent 21 years as a risk taker (quantitative trader) before becoming a flaneur and researcher in philosophical, mathematical and (mostly) practical problems with probability.
Taleb is the author of a multivolume essay, the Incerto (The Black Swan, Fooled by Randomness, Antifragile, and Skin in the Game) an investigation of opacity, luck, uncertainty, probability, human error, risk, and decision making when we don’t understand the world, expressed in the form of a personal essay with autobiographical sections, stories, parables, and philosophical, historical, and scientic discussions in nonover lapping volumes that can be accessed in any order.
In addition to his trader life, Taleb has also written, as a backup of the Incerto, more than 50 scholarly papers in statistical physics, statistics, philosophy, ethics, economics, international affairs, and quantitative finance, all around the notion of risk and probability.
Taleb is currently Distinguished Professor of Risk Engineering at NYU's Tandon School of Engineering (only a quarter time position). His current focus is on the properties of systems that can handle disorder ("antifragile").
Taleb believes that prizes, honorary degrees, awards, and ceremonialism debase knowledge by turning it into a spectator sport.
From the New York Times bestselling author of The Black Swan, a bold new work that challenges many of our long-held beliefs about risk and reward, politics and religion, finance and personal responsibility
In his most provocative and practical book yet, one of the foremost thinkers of our time redefines what it means to understand the world, succeed in a profession, contribute to a fair and just society, detect nonsense, and influence others. Citing examples ranging from Hammurabi to Seneca, Antaeus the Giant to Donald Trump, Nassim Nicholas Taleb shows how the willingness to accept one’s own risks is an essential attribute of heroes, saints, and flourishing people in all walks of life.
As always both accessible and iconoclastic, Taleb challenges long-held beliefs about the values of those who spearhead military interventions, make financial investments, and propagate religious faiths. Among his insights:
• For social justice, focus on symmetry and risk sharing. You cannot make profits and transfer the risks to others, as bankers and large corporations do. You cannot get rich without owning your own risk and paying for your own losses. Forcing skin in the game corrects this asymmetry better than thousands of laws and regulations.
• Ethical rules aren’t universal. You’re part of a group larger than you, but it’s still smaller than humanity in general.
• Minorities, not majorities, run the world. The world is not run by consensus but by stubborn minorities imposing their tastes and ethics on others.
• You can be an intellectual yet still be an idiot. “Educated philistines” have been wrong on everything from Stalinism to Iraq to low-carb diets.
• Beware of complicated solutions (that someone was paid to find). A simple barbell can build muscle better than expensive new machines.
• True religion is commitment, not just faith. How much you believe in something is manifested only by what you’re willing to risk for it.
The phrase “skin in the game” is one we have often heard but rarely stopped to truly dissect. It is the backbone of risk management, but it’s also an astonishingly complex worldview that, as Taleb shows in this book, applies to all aspects of our lives.
1. 什么是Skin in the game? 这本书的副标题可以说是非常具有误导性了,并不是常规意义上的asymmetry 简单来说,Skin in the game指的是对所参与的事要有“代价”—— 提出一个方案,成功要有相应的奖励,失败要有相应的损失。否则 - 可能提出不切实际、有损利益的方案,即经典...
评分要理解这本书,首先得看看书名。这是从维基百科查到的结果,To have "skin in the game" is to have incurred risk (monetary or otherwise) by being involved in achieving a goal. 简单地说,就是共担风险,共享利益。书中用汉穆拉比法典中的一个规定解释了这个概念,汉谟拉...
评分 评分全书其实结构略显凌乱的,像作者平日的博文装订成册,前后章节内容有穿插重复。全文所有“skin in the game”为了呼应标题都翻译成了“风险共担”,有点牵强,造成了理解困难。其实skin in the game在书里可做很多差别微妙的解释,比起“风险”,更多是在讲有代价才有收获,以...
评分知识分子骂人果然很有姿势水平。不要看纽约客;不要随便相信知识分子(点名斯蒂芬平克、皮凯蒂和理查德泰勒)和行为经济学,他们都是IYI;being alive means taking certain risks ;如何解决道德难题?要么独善其身,要么财务自由 。
评分除了傲慢和恶意外依然好
评分libertarian with strong traditionalist hues...
评分年度最佳
评分偏激又恶毒~本书献给了Ron Paul,awww
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有