Diana Fu is Assistant Professor of Asian Politics at the University of Toronto. This book builds upon her dissertation research at the University of Oxford where she studied as a Rhodes Scholar. Previously, she was a Walter H. Shorenstein Postdoctoral Fellow at Stanford University, California and a pre-doctoral fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research has been supported by the Harold Hyam Wingate Foundation, the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation, and the Rhodes Trust. Her academic articles have been published in Comparative Political Studies, Governance, and Modern China, among others. Her writing and research have appeared in The Economist, Foreign Affairs, The Washington Post, The Boston Review, PostGlobal, and Nicholas Kristof's 'On the Ground' Blog for The New York Times.
When advocacy organizations are forbidden from rallying people to take to the streets, what do they do? When activists are detained for coordinating protests, are their hands ultimately tied? Based on political ethnography inside both legal and blacklisted labor organizations in China, this book reveals how state repression is deployed on the ground and to what effect on mobilization. It presents a novel dynamic of civil society contention - mobilizing without the masses - that lowers the risk of activism under duress. Instead of facilitating collective action, activists coach the aggrieved to challenge authorities one by one. In doing so, they lower the risks of organizing while empowering the weak. This dynamic represents a third pathway of contention that challenges conventional understandings of mobilization in an illiberal state. It takes readers inside the world of underground labor organizing and opens the black box of repression inside the world's most powerful authoritarian state.
評分
評分
評分
評分
正如標題講的Mobilizing without Masses需要完成Mobilization和without masses兩個任務。Diana可以在寫作中對casing和framing的利用,來插入organizations在state-individual relationship的作用,全篇其實還是在講dynamic interaction這個經典話題,隻不過有state給予的條件,又有individuals的需求,所以有一個新的theoretical contribution,即處於collective action 和the weapon of weak中間的灰色地帶。參看Diana的publications,她更熟練的是state and civil society而非微觀組織。
评分越看literature越接近自己想要做的研究,是好事還是壞事? 從organization的角度看contention的literature還是比較少的。不過說實話這些practice嚴格意義上來說算不算mobilization其實不好說。fragmented control和competitive control是兩個很好的model,但case study能提供的說辭太淺薄瞭。沒有看到很強烈的competition也沒看到各個state actors之間的conflicts。後期的對於organization strategies的描寫同樣很白描。給我political science的寫作風格就是如此的感覺。
评分比較淺但Dedication page是亮點23333
评分就那樣吧……
评分正如標題講的Mobilizing without Masses需要完成Mobilization和without masses兩個任務。Diana可以在寫作中對casing和framing的利用,來插入organizations在state-individual relationship的作用,全篇其實還是在講dynamic interaction這個經典話題,隻不過有state給予的條件,又有individuals的需求,所以有一個新的theoretical contribution,即處於collective action 和the weapon of weak中間的灰色地帶。參看Diana的publications,她更熟練的是state and civil society而非微觀組織。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有