Catherine ("Cathy") Helen O'Neil is an American mathematician and the author of the blog mathbabe.org and several books on data science, including Weapons of Math Destruction. She was the former Director of the Lede Program in Data Practices at Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, Tow Center and was employed as Data Science Consultant at Johnson Research Labs.
She lives in New York City and is active in the Occupy movement.
A former Wall Street quant sounds an alarm on mathematical modeling—a pervasive new force in society that threatens to undermine democracy and widen inequality.
We live in the age of the algorithm. Increasingly, the decisions that affect our lives—where we go to school, whether we get a car loan, how much we pay for health insurance—are being made not by humans, but by mathematical models. In theory, this should lead to greater fairness: Everyone is judged according to the same rules, and bias is eliminated. But as Cathy O’Neil reveals in this shocking book, the opposite is true. The models being used today are opaque, unregulated, and uncontestable, even when they’re wrong. Most troubling, they reinforce discrimination: If a poor student can’t get a loan because a lending model deems him too risky (by virtue of his race or neighborhood), he’s then cut off from the kind of education that could pull him out of poverty, and a vicious spiral ensues. Models are propping up the lucky and punishing the downtrodden, creating a “toxic cocktail for democracy.” Welcome to the dark side of Big Data.
Tracing the arc of a person’s life, from college to retirement, O’Neil exposes the black box models that shape our future, both as individuals and as a society. Models that score teachers and students, sort resumes, grant (or deny) loans, evaluate workers, target voters, set parole, and monitor our health—all have pernicious feedback loops. They don’t simply describe reality, as proponents claim, they change reality, by expanding or limiting the opportunities people have. O’Neil calls on modelers to take more responsibility for how their algorithms are being used. But in the end, it’s up to us to become more savvy about the models that govern our lives. This important book empowers us to ask the tough questions, uncover the truth, and demand change.
文 / 董小琳 我们可以将时代划分为:有大数据之前 和 有大数据之后。 为什么要这么分? 因为,谁也不能忽视,大数据对我们每个人生活方方面面的影响。 比如说: 之前,你的日子过得好不好,恐怕除了家里人,只有几个关系特别好的朋友知道。 甚至,在亲戚比较多的大家庭里,你还...
评分虽然是很多事实的罗列,但如果不去看,可能永远也不会知道。前半部分比较无趣,后半部分有种战斗的感觉。 人类发明出来的许多工具都是中性的,关键是如何利用。这可能不仅仅是一个科技上的问题,更是一个道德问题。风险共担的意识在大数据时代更为重要和宝贵。因为一旦违背道德...
评分感谢 recall 这本书的不知名同学,谢谢你逼得我用4个小时读完。 作者创造了“数学杀伤性武器”(Weapons of Math Destruction, WMD)这个词指代统计模型,探讨现实生活中统计模型的大规模应用对社会的影响。 正面例子是棒球、篮球比赛的分析,可以即时调整战术(参考《点球成金...
大数据伦理讨论小合集。身在tech公司做大数据的东西,经常考虑这方面的东西。模型再好也难以100%正确,而那很小的一部分却的确能影响他们的生活。赞同作者的一些批评,但是并不能因噎废食。研究者更应该努力把模型做得更好(大部分批评都焦聚在feature selection不对,model不对之类的方面),因为相比起来,alternative更加不可取---信息太少纯粹靠拍脑袋做决定。另外,这名字起得太好了!!
评分通篇读完觉得稍空了一些 中途回想起实习时的贷款延期批准模型 误判率数字背后都联系着顾客生计 唉想来不止是一个技术问题这么简单 作者自己从业经历背景也蛮厉害的 总体论调不反智!
评分中国急需这样的左翼知识分子:对技术有深刻理解,并且能看到技术对社会造成的影响。
评分认真推荐给每一位朋友。大多数人并没有意识到借着大数据(或人工智能、算法等)的旗号,科技巨头和政府的作恶能力有多可怕。特别是国内,针对这方面在制度和舆论上的制衡更是几乎为零。想想这一年多来各种新闻吧,比如某某积分系统,比如 7 分钟识别定位,我们更应感到毛骨悚然
评分大数据伦理讨论小合集。身在tech公司做大数据的东西,经常考虑这方面的东西。模型再好也难以100%正确,而那很小的一部分却的确能影响他们的生活。赞同作者的一些批评,但是并不能因噎废食。研究者更应该努力把模型做得更好(大部分批评都焦聚在feature selection不对,model不对之类的方面),因为相比起来,alternative更加不可取---信息太少纯粹靠拍脑袋做决定。另外,这名字起得太好了!!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有