圖書標籤: 新清史 海外中國研究 柯嬌燕 曆史 清史 identity 民族 中國曆史
发表于2025-02-07
A Translucent Mirror pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025
In this landmark exploration of the origins of nationalism and cultural identity in China, Pamela Kyle Crossley traces the ways in which a large, early modern empire of Eurasia, the Qing (1636-1912), incorporated neighboring, but disparate, political traditions into a new style of emperorship. Drawing on a wide variety of primary sources, including Manchu, Korean, and Chinese archival materials, Crossley argues that distortions introduced in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century historical records have blinded scholars to the actual course of events in the early years of the dynasty. This groundbreaking study examines the relationship between the increasingly abstract ideology of the centralizing emperorship of the Qing and the establishment of concepts of identity in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, before the advent of nationalism in China. Concluding with a broad-ranging postscript on the implications of her research for studies of nationalism and nation-building throughout modern Chinese history, A Translucent Mirror combines a readable narrative with a sophisticated, revisionary look at China's history. Crossley's book will alter current understandings of the Qing emperorship, the evolution of concepts of ethnicity, and the legacy of Qing rule for modern Chinese nationalism.
Pamela Kyle Crossley is Rosenwald Research Professor of History, Dartmouth College; author of Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations and the End of the Qing World (1990) and The Manchus (1997); and coauthor (with Richard Bulliet and Dan Headrick) of The Earth and Its Peoples (1997).
柯氏說過對新清史頗有保留。以此書觀之,柯氏與新清史歧異有三:首先新清史念茲在茲的滿族性和認同,柯氏不認為是入關前隱然確立、入關後旗滿一體化,而是在滿清延展疆域中通過族係、神話和曆史重估逐漸構建;其次,也相應滿族認同流動性,柯氏認為清朝多民族多文化帝國意象,以至包括內地漢人“中國”認同,也都是在滿清重構十七十八世紀曆史話語中成立(而延展到近代發展為梁啓超章炳麟之民族主義論爭)。最後也是最重要,柯氏完全把清史歸入早期現代帝國史及帝國民族與民族主義發明史行列,問題意識源於安德森等人之民族認同學而非傳統史學:民族與族群認同係於帝國性和普世性,帝國普世性又進一步係於被神化的帝王世係與傳奇(從需要部落推舉之大漢到自我閤法化之帝王)及超然於各民族文化之上的寰宇觀(帝王自我包裝多麵觀及自認為天下曆史動力)。
評分花瞭三周給研究生同學講完這本書,馬上就要寫一份數萬字的長篇述評ヽ(  ̄д ̄;)ノ希望以後不要再看到zhong言zhong語……
評分剛讀完,有一個大緻的印象,糊裏糊塗的,再整理一下思路
評分有一些敏銳的論點,可是書寫的實在頗為彆扭....
評分反復讀,極有收獲,這是所謂滿洲四書中理論性最強的一本,如果能把柯教授在1990年和1992年對族性和皇權性質的文章結閤在一起讀,就能夠理解她為什麼批評新清史學者把“滿洲”和“清”混為一談的觀點瞭。
2001年第4期 University of California Press, 1999 张慧文 译 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 柯娇燕的《半透明之镜:清帝国意识形态中的“历史”与“身份”》洞见深刻,标志着十年来清史研究的巅峰。与美国历史学家Mark...
評分Somewhere between emperorship and ethnicity(identity) falls A Translucent Mirror. Running through Nurgaci, Huang Taiji and Qianlong, it explores the ideology of universal emperorship in different period of the Manchu rule, together with its relation to “co...
評分Somewhere between emperorship and ethnicity(identity) falls A Translucent Mirror. Running through Nurgaci, Huang Taiji and Qianlong, it explores the ideology of universal emperorship in different period of the Manchu rule, together with its relation to “co...
評分Somewhere between emperorship and ethnicity(identity) falls A Translucent Mirror. Running through Nurgaci, Huang Taiji and Qianlong, it explores the ideology of universal emperorship in different period of the Manchu rule, together with its relation to “co...
評分意识形态、统治权和历史 清皇权接收信息,予之联想形式(associative forms),再将其送返。没有代理机构从头开始表演这套艺术。理想情况下或许能把理念转换和散播的每个时刻孤立起来,但既然这不可能,读者必须记住,清统治的各个时期在这方面从来不是静止的,视作一个整体的...
A Translucent Mirror pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025