An array of general ideas useful in a wide variety of fields. Starting from the foundations, this book illuminates the concepts of category, functor, natural transformation, and duality. It then turns to adjoint functors, which provide a description of universal constructions, an analysis of the representations of functors by sets of morphisms, and a means of manipulating direct and inverse limits. These categorical concepts are extensively illustrated in the remaining chapters, which include many applications of the basic existence theorem for adjoint functors. The categories of algebraic systems are constructed from certain adjoint-like data and characterised by Beck's theorem. After considering a variety of applications, the book continues with the construction and exploitation of Kan extensions. This second edition includes a number of revisions and additions, including new chapters on topics of active interest: symmetric monoidal categories and braided monoidal categories, and the coherence theorems for them, as well as 2-categories and the higher dimensional categories which have recently come into prominence.
The University of Chicago’s Saunders Mac Lane, one of the most influential American mathematicians of the 20th century and a recipient of the National Medal of Science, died Thursday, April 14, in San Francisco after a long illness. He was 95.
“He was one of the most important figures in the University of Chicago Mathematics Department, or indeed in American mathematics,” David Eisenbud wrote of Mac Lane in the preface of the latter’s autobiography, which will be published in late May by A K Peters Ltd. Eisenbud, who received his Ph.D. in Mathematics from the University of Chicago under Mac Lane’s supervision in 1970, is the president of the American Mathematical Society and director of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, Calif.
Peter May, Professor in Mathematics at the University of Chicago, described the multifaceted Mac Lane as “extremely energetic, dynamic, clear-headed, opinionated, a raconteur.” In his research, “he was extraordinarily perceptive and original, and he was especially strong as a philosopher of mathematics,” May said.
“With Sammy Eilenberg he created a new way of thinking about mathematics. In a landmark 1945 paper, they introduced and named the concepts of ‘categories,’ ‘functors’ and ‘natural transformations.’ The language they introduced there transformed modern mathematics,” he said. “In fact, a very great deal of mathematics since then would quite literally have been unthinkable without that language.”
F. William Lawvere, Emeritus professor of mathematics at the State University of New York at Buffalo, said, “Category theory is still exploding in its influence after 60 years, illuminating and guiding the development of practically every one of the many varied fields of mathematics.”
Category theory was first developed as a language to describe transformations from one area of mathematics into another, although it later developed into a field of study in its own right. Said May, “Mac Lane was one of the pioneers of algebraic topology, a subject in which one transforms, or describes, spatial structures, which one first sees in terms of shapes—spaces with holes, like a doughnut, say—into algebraic structures, with addition and multiplication, in which one can do calculations.”
The development of category theory and algebraic topology was accompanied by the development of another subject, homological algebra, a kind of algebra that plays a prominent role in algebraic topology and other branches of mathematics. “Mac Lane played a major role in establishing the foundations of these and related areas of modern mathematics, and he wrote famous texts that are some of the most readable accounts of these fields,” May said.
Category theory was at first perceived by some mathematicians as too abstract for practical mathematics, May said. Consequently, Mac Lane titled his introductory book to the field Categories for the Working Mathematician.
Peter Johnstone, professor of the foundations of mathematics at the University of Cambridge, also lauded Mac Lane for his legacy as a mathematical historian. “In the many papers he wrote on historical topics in his later years, he has left a unique body of material for future historians of 20th-century mathematics, written by someone who was there at the time and who knew what it was like to be working at the cutting edge of mathematical research,” Johnstone said.
Mac Lane also steered national science and mathematics policy through his work on numerous boards, and guided dozens of students to mathematical careers.
In the support of scientific research, Mac Lane served as vice president of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society, and as president of the Mathematical Association of America and the American Mathematical Society. As president of the Mathematical Association of America in the 1950s, he began the first activity of that organization toward improvement in the teaching of modern mathematics.
He was a member of the National Science Board from 1974 to 1980, providing science policy advice to the U.S. government. In 1976, he led a delegation of mathematicians to the People’s Republic of China to examine the conditions affecting the development of mathematics in that nation.
“Saunders’ principal characteristic was his immensely strong sense of duty and service,” Johnstone said. “He felt it was his duty to the profession to which he was privileged to belong, even though I’m sure he found it less congenial work than actually doing mathematics.”
For a time there were three members of the University of Chicago Mathematics Department who had received their Ph.D.s under Mac Lane’s supervision. The first of the three was Alfred Putnam, who studied under Mac Lane at Harvard University in 1942. The other two were John Thompson, who received his Ph.D. in 1959, and Arunas Liulevicius, who did likewise in 1960, both from the University of Chicago. Thompson received the Fields Medal, sometimes referred to as the Nobel Prize of mathematics, in 1970.
Another prominent student of Mac Lane’s, Irving Kaplansky, also served on the University of Chicago faculty. Kaplansky was Mac Lane’s first Ph.D. student, receiving his degree at Harvard in 1941. Kaplansky served as Chairman of Chicago’s Department of Mathematics and as director of Berkeley’s Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and is a member of the National Academy of Sciences.
Mac Lane supervised 39 Ph.D. students at Chicago, a record surpassed by only three other professors in the history of the University’s Mathematics Department. His last Ph.D. student, Steve Awodey, completed his degree in logic in 1997. Then in his 80s, Mac Lane was still energetic, always insisting upon taking the stairs to his third-floor office in the Ryerson Physical Laboratory, Awodey recalled.
Mac Lane was “a link to a past world of mathematics that’s gone now,” said Awodey, an associate professor in philosophy at Carnegie Mellon University. Mac Lane studied logic and mathematics as a Ph.D. student under several world-renowned mathematicians in the early 1930s in Göttingen, Germany, including David Hilbert, Emmy Noether and Hermann Weyl. At the time Göttingen was the world’s center of mathematical research, and Mac Lane often told stories of the great figures he encountered there.
Mac Lane was born in Norwich, Conn., on Aug. 4, 1909. He earned his bachelor’s degree from Yale College in 1930, and his master’s from the University of Chicago in 1931. His first scientific paper was published during this period, in physics. It was co-authored by Irving Langmuir, who received the 1932 Nobel Prize in chemistry.
For his Ph.D., which Mac Lane received in 1934 from the Mathematisches Institut of Göttingen, Germany, he studied under two prominent mathematicians, Hermann Weyl and Paul Bernays.
Mac Lane worked as a mathematics instructor at Harvard and Cornell universities and at the University of Chicago from 1934 to 1938. He served again on the Harvard faculty from 1938 to 1947, and at Chicago beginning in 1947. In 1944 and 1945, he also directed Columbia University’s Applied Mathematics Group, which was involved in the war effort.
Mac Lane was Chairman of the Mathematics Department at Chicago from 1952 to 1958, taking the reins from Marshall Stone at a time many consider the high point in the department’s history. He was appointed the Max Mason Distinguished Service Professor in Mathematics in 1963, and became Professor Emeritus in 1982.
He was the author or co-author of more than 100 research papers and six books: A Survey of Modern Algebra (1941); Homology (1963); Algebra (1967); Categories for the Working Mathematician (1971); Mathematics, Form and Function (1985); and Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory, with Ieke Moerdijk, (1992).
His A Survey of Modern Algebra, written with Garrett Birkhoff, was for years the leading textbook in its field and was republished by A K Peters Ltd. in 1997.
Mac Lane was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1949. He received the nation’s highest award for scientific achievement, the National Medal of Science, in 1989. Mac Lane received two Guggenheim Fellowships and visited Australia as a Fulbright Scholar. He also received honorary degrees from Purdue University, Yale University and the University of Glasgow, among others. Other honors include both the Chauvenet Prize and the Distinguished Service award of the Mathematical Association of America, the Steele Career Prize of the American Mathematical Society, and honorary fellowship in the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
The University of Chicago Alumni Association presented Mac Lane the Norman Maclean Faculty Award in 2003. The Maclean Award recognizes emeritus professors or senior faculty members who have made outstanding contributions to teaching and to the experience of student life on campus.
Mac Lane is survived by his widow, Osa, of San Francisco, and two daughters, Gretchen Mac Lane of New York City and Cynthia Hay of London; one grandson, William Hay, of London; three stepchildren, William Segal of Washington, D.C.; Andrew Segal of Santa Fe, N.M.; and Karen Segal of San Francisco;, and five step-grandchildren. Mac Lane’s first wife, Dorothy Jones Mac Lane, died in 1985.
Services for the family were held in San Francisco April 19. The Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley will hold a memorial at 4:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 4.
对这些影印版图书就那么不上心么,封底的作者名字都写错,这已经是我第二次看到这种低级错误了,《理想数、簇与算法》竟然把封面标题都写错,影印图书的国内工作量本来就小,这还做不好,工作人员去死了算了
评分对这些影印版图书就那么不上心么,封底的作者名字都写错,这已经是我第二次看到这种低级错误了,《理想数、簇与算法》竟然把封面标题都写错,影印图书的国内工作量本来就小,这还做不好,工作人员去死了算了
评分对这些影印版图书就那么不上心么,封底的作者名字都写错,这已经是我第二次看到这种低级错误了,《理想数、簇与算法》竟然把封面标题都写错,影印图书的国内工作量本来就小,这还做不好,工作人员去死了算了
评分对这些影印版图书就那么不上心么,封底的作者名字都写错,这已经是我第二次看到这种低级错误了,《理想数、簇与算法》竟然把封面标题都写错,影印图书的国内工作量本来就小,这还做不好,工作人员去死了算了
评分对这些影印版图书就那么不上心么,封底的作者名字都写错,这已经是我第二次看到这种低级错误了,《理想数、簇与算法》竟然把封面标题都写错,影印图书的国内工作量本来就小,这还做不好,工作人员去死了算了
我一直对数学的抽象结构和普适性原则深感着迷,而范畴论正是这一领域的代表。然而,范畴论的抽象性也常常让人望而却步。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,恰恰点出了它的独特之处,它面向的是那些需要在日常工作中应用范畴论的数学家。我希望这本书能够提供一种更加贴近实际应用的讲解方式,帮助我理解范畴论的核心概念,并且更重要的是,能够清晰地展示范畴论在代数、几何、拓扑等不同数学领域中的应用。我尤其看重书中是否能提供具体的案例,来说明范畴论如何帮助我们统一不同的理论,或者如何提供解决问题的新的视角。如果这本书能够让我建立起对范畴论的扎实理解,并能自信地将其应用于我的研究,那我将认为这是一次非常成功的学习体验。我渴望通过这本书,能够更好地驾驭范畴论这一强大的数学工具。
评分我一直对数学的普遍性原则着迷,而范畴论正是这种普遍性原则的极致体现。它提供了一种超越具体数学对象的框架,能够让我们从更高的视角来审视数学的结构和联系。然而,要真正掌握范畴论,确实需要一番努力。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的出现,正好填补了我在这方面的需求。我希望这本书能够以一种循序渐进的方式,带领我深入理解范畴论的核心概念,比如函子、自然变换、伴随函子等等。更重要的是,我期待这本书能够清晰地展示范畴论在实际数学研究中的应用,例如它如何深刻地影响了代数几何、拓扑学、数论等领域。我希望能从书中找到具体的例子,说明范畴论是如何帮助我们解决一些看似棘手的问题,或者提供新的研究思路。如果这本书能够帮助我建立起对范畴论的扎实理解,并能让我看到它在我自己的研究领域中的潜在应用,那将是非常有价值的。我希望它能让我摆脱“只知其名,不知其义”的困境,真正领会范畴论的精妙之处。
评分在我看来,数学的美妙之处在于其内在的统一性和普遍性。而范畴论,正是这一理念的最佳诠释者,它提供了一种高屋建瓴的视角,能够将看似毫不相关的数学概念和结构联系起来。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,准确地传达了它的核心宗旨——面向实际应用的范畴论。我一直在寻找一本能够帮助我深入理解范畴论,并且能将其应用于我自身研究的书籍。我希望这本书能够以一种清晰、有条理的方式介绍范畴论的基本概念,例如范畴、函子、自然变换等,并详细阐述它们在不同数学分支中的应用,比如代数、几何、拓扑等。我尤其期待书中能有丰富的实例,展示范畴论如何帮助我们统一不同的数学理论,或者提供解决问题的全新思路。如果这本书能够让我真正掌握范畴论的精髓,并将其灵活运用到我的研究中,那么它将是无价之宝。我希望能通过这本书,对数学的理解上升到一个全新的高度。
评分我一直对数学的深层结构和普遍性原则抱有浓厚的兴趣,而范畴论正是这一领域的极致体现。它提供了一种超越具体对象的通用框架,能够串联起数学的不同分支。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,极具吸引力,因为它明确了目标读者是“工作中的数学家”,这意味着它更注重范畴论的实用性和应用价值。我期待这本书能够清晰地介绍范畴论的基本概念,例如范畴、函子、自然变换,并且更重要的是,能够展示这些概念如何在代数、几何、拓扑等领域发挥作用。我尤其希望能看到书中提供具体的案例研究,来说明范畴论如何帮助统一不同的数学理论,或者为解决实际问题提供新的思路。如果这本书能够帮助我建立起对范畴论的深刻理解,并让我能够将其自信地应用于我的研究,那将是非常有价值的。我希望它能成为我理解更深层数学结构的有力助手。
评分我对数学的迷恋,很大程度上源于它内在的逻辑严谨性和结构的美感。而范畴论,恰恰是这种结构美学的集中体现,它提供了一种超越具体数学对象的通用语言。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,精确地捕捉了我所寻找的。它不仅仅是关于范畴论的理论,更是关于如何将范畴论应用于“实际工作”的数学家。我非常渴望这本书能够为我揭示范畴论在不同数学领域中的实际应用,例如它如何在代数几何中统一几何对象和代数结构,如何在拓扑学中提供对空间的深刻洞察,或者如何在范畴论的框架下理解更复杂的代数结构。我希望书中能够提供足够多的例子和应用场景,让我能够看到范畴论的强大之处,并学习如何运用它来解决我的研究中遇到的问题。如果这本书能够帮助我建立起对范畴论的直观理解和扎实应用能力,那它将是我书架上最宝贵的藏品之一。我期待它能够成为我连接不同数学分支的桥梁,为我的研究注入新的活力。
评分这本《Categories for the Working Mathematician》的书名就足够吸引我了,它直指那些在实际工作中需要运用范畴论的数学家们,而非仅仅是理论研究者。我一直觉得范畴论有一种难以言喻的优雅和统一的力量,能够串联起数学的各个分支,但学习门槛也相对较高。我常常在阅读一些代数几何、同调代数甚至拓扑学的文章时,会遇到范畴论的术语和概念,但总是感觉隔靴搔痒,无法深入理解其精髓。这本著作的出现,就像是为我打开了一扇新的大门,它承诺用一种更贴近实际应用的方式来解读范畴论,这对于我这样一个希望在研究中更灵活运用数学工具的人来说,无疑是一剂强心针。我特别期待它能在不牺牲严谨性的前提下,提供清晰直观的解释,并且能够展示范畴论在不同数学领域中的具体应用案例。如果这本书能够帮助我建立起对范畴论的扎实理解,并能融会贯通地将其应用于我的研究方向,那将是无价的。我甚至开始想象,通过学习这本书,我是否能够重新审视那些我曾经觉得晦涩难懂的定理和证明,从中发现更深层次的结构和联系。这种期待让我感到兴奋,仿佛即将踏上一段充满挑战却又充满回报的知识探索之旅。
评分数学的魅力,很大程度上在于它能够提供一种统一的语言来描述世界。而范畴论,作为一种高度抽象和普遍化的数学理论,恰恰是实现这一目标的关键。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,精准地击中了我的需求。它不仅仅是理论的探讨,更是关于如何将范畴论的知识应用于实际的数学研究。我期待这本书能够以一种易于理解且严谨的方式,介绍范畴论的核心概念,比如范畴、函子、自然变换等,并深入阐述它们在代数、几何、拓扑等不同数学分支中的应用。我尤其希望书中能够包含丰富的实例,展示范畴论如何帮助我们发现数学的内在联系,或者解决那些看似棘手的数学难题。如果这本书能让我真正掌握范畴论的精髓,并能够自信地将其运用到我的研究中,那它将是我数学学习生涯中一个重要的里程碑。
评分作为一名在数学领域不断探索的从业者,我始终追求能够找到一种更高效、更具普适性的方法来理解和解决问题。范畴论,以其抽象而强大的框架,一直是我非常感兴趣但又难以深入的领域。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,直接击中了我的痛点,它承诺的是面向“实干家”的范畴论,这对我来说意义非凡。我期待这本书能够跳出纯粹理论的窠臼,而是聚焦于范畴论在实际数学研究中的应用价值。我希望它能提供清晰的解释,帮助我理解诸如范畴、函子、自然变换等基本概念,并且更重要的是,能够展示这些概念是如何在代数、几何、拓扑等不同领域发挥作用的。我尤其希望书中能够包含一些具体的案例研究,说明范畴论如何帮助数学家们统一不同理论,或者发现新的联系。如果这本书能够让我将范畴论的知识转化为解决实际问题的工具,那么它绝对是一笔宝贵的财富。我渴望从中获得那种“豁然开朗”的感觉,看到范畴论如何为我的研究开辟新的可能性。
评分对于许多像我一样,在各个数学分支中摸索前进的研究者来说,范畴论常常以一种“隐形”的方式存在。我们会在不同的文献中瞥见它的身影,它像是隐藏在表面之下的骨架,支撑着那些复杂的结构。然而,想要系统地学习范畴论,往往意味着要投入大量的时间和精力去消化抽象的概念,这对于日常研究压力巨大的我们来说,并非易事。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,恰恰点明了它独特的定位:它面向的是“实际工作”的数学家,这意味着它不会止步于纯粹的理论构建,而是会关注范畴论的实用价值和应用层面。我希望这本书能够提供一种“即插即用”式的学习体验,让我能够快速掌握核心概念,并立刻看到它们如何能够解决实际问题。我特别看重它是否能提供足够多的例子,能够清晰地展示范畴论如何被用来统一不同领域的数学思想,比如如何通过范畴论的语言来理解模运算、群表示、拓扑空间之间的关系等等。如果这本书能帮助我构建起对范畴论的直观认识,并能让我自信地将其应用于我的日常研究,那么它将成为我书架上不可或缺的工具书。我对它能否成为我理解更高级数学概念的“助推器”抱有极大的期望。
评分在我的数学学习和研究历程中,范畴论始终像一个神秘而强大的存在,我时常能感受到它在各种高级数学理论中的重要性,但要真正掌握并运用它,却常常感到力不从心。《Categories for the Working Mathematician》这本书的书名,对我来说极具吸引力,因为它明确了目标读者群体——那些需要在实际工作中运用范畴论的数学家。这意味着这本书不会仅仅停留在对抽象概念的理论阐述,而是会更侧重于范畴论的实用性和应用价值。我希望这本书能够提供一种直观且严谨的讲解方式,让我能够理解范畴论的核心思想,例如范畴的基本定义、函子的作用、自然变换的意义等等。更让我期待的是,这本书能否展示范畴论在不同数学分支中的具体应用,比如它如何帮助统一代数和几何的语言,或者在同调代数和代数拓扑中扮演的角色。如果这本书能帮助我建立起对范畴论的深刻理解,并能让我自信地将其应用于我的研究,那我将感到非常满足。我希望它能成为我理解更深层数学结构的一把钥匙。
评分这本书让我在4星和5星间犹豫恒久。主要是有点拖沓
评分这本书让我在4星和5星间犹豫恒久。主要是有点拖沓
评分不得不掌握的理论。但是不就着实例学,这玩意儿是噩梦。
评分必须知道的范畴论
评分不得不掌握的理论。但是不就着实例学,这玩意儿是噩梦。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有