Alexei Yurchak is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley.
Soviet socialism was based on paradoxes that were revealed by the peculiar experience of its collapse. To the people who lived in that system the collapse seemed both completely unexpected and completely unsurprising. At the moment of collapse it suddenly became obvious that Soviet life had always seemed simultaneously eternal and stagnating, vigorous and ailing, bleak and full of promise. Although these characteristics may appear mutually exclusive, in fact they were mutually constitutive. This book explores the paradoxes of Soviet life during the period of 'late socialism' (1960's - 1980's) through the eyes of the last Soviet generation.Focusing on the major transformation of the 1950's at the level of discourse, ideology, language, and ritual, Alexei Yurchak traces the emergence of multiple unanticipated meanings, communities, relations, ideals, and pursuits that this transformation subsequently enabled. His historical, anthropological, and linguistic analysis draws on rich ethnographic material from Late Socialism and the post-Soviet period. The model of Soviet socialism that emerges provides an alternative to binary accounts that describe that system as a dichotomy of official culture and unofficial culture, the state and the people, public self and private self, truth and lie - and ignore the crucial fact that, for many Soviet citizens, the fundamental values, ideals, and realities of socialism were genuinely important, although they routinely transgressed and reinterpreted the norms and rules of the socialist state.
評分
評分
評分
評分
曆曆在目。提齣瞭有趣的問題,on what kind of internal systematic shifts at the level of discourse, ideology, social relations, and time was this paradox (人們似乎為蘇聯的突然解體做瞭充分的準備)predicted? 但是語言人類學理論用得很怪,我認為她的基本分析單位選錯瞭。
评分蘇聯後期社會文化小百科,分析瞭一些蘇聯時期很有趣的現象,比如搖滾樂的流行,咖啡館的文學漫談,以及蘇聯政治笑話,輔以理論支撐,讀起來感覺相當豐滿。
评分算是我讀研期間最喜歡的專業相關書籍…之一吧。繁復的學術理論之外,更有作者對他同一代人命運軌跡的深深洞見,對舊政權理性又不乏幽默的解析,以及不經意的微小鄉愁,很好看。
评分曆曆在目。提齣瞭有趣的問題,on what kind of internal systematic shifts at the level of discourse, ideology, social relations, and time was this paradox (人們似乎為蘇聯的突然解體做瞭充分的準備)predicted? 但是語言人類學理論用得很怪,我認為她的基本分析單位選錯瞭。
评分曆曆在目。提齣瞭有趣的問題,on what kind of internal systematic shifts at the level of discourse, ideology, social relations, and time was this paradox (人們似乎為蘇聯的突然解體做瞭充分的準備)predicted? 但是語言人類學理論用得很怪,我認為她的基本分析單位選錯瞭。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有