Alexei Yurchak is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley.
Soviet socialism was based on paradoxes that were revealed by the peculiar experience of its collapse. To the people who lived in that system the collapse seemed both completely unexpected and completely unsurprising. At the moment of collapse it suddenly became obvious that Soviet life had always seemed simultaneously eternal and stagnating, vigorous and ailing, bleak and full of promise. Although these characteristics may appear mutually exclusive, in fact they were mutually constitutive. This book explores the paradoxes of Soviet life during the period of 'late socialism' (1960's - 1980's) through the eyes of the last Soviet generation.Focusing on the major transformation of the 1950's at the level of discourse, ideology, language, and ritual, Alexei Yurchak traces the emergence of multiple unanticipated meanings, communities, relations, ideals, and pursuits that this transformation subsequently enabled. His historical, anthropological, and linguistic analysis draws on rich ethnographic material from Late Socialism and the post-Soviet period. The model of Soviet socialism that emerges provides an alternative to binary accounts that describe that system as a dichotomy of official culture and unofficial culture, the state and the people, public self and private self, truth and lie - and ignore the crucial fact that, for many Soviet citizens, the fundamental values, ideals, and realities of socialism were genuinely important, although they routinely transgressed and reinterpreted the norms and rules of the socialist state.
评分
评分
评分
评分
這種材料收集量!我的媽!
评分苏联后期社会文化小百科,分析了一些苏联时期很有趣的现象,比如摇滚乐的流行,咖啡馆的文学漫谈,以及苏联政治笑话,辅以理论支撑,读起来感觉相当丰满。
评分算是我读研期间最喜欢的专业相关书籍…之一吧。繁复的学术理论之外,更有作者对他同一代人命运轨迹的深深洞见,对旧政权理性又不乏幽默的解析,以及不经意的微小乡愁,很好看。
评分历历在目。提出了有趣的问题,on what kind of internal systematic shifts at the level of discourse, ideology, social relations, and time was this paradox (人们似乎为苏联的突然解体做了充分的准备)predicted? 但是语言人类学理论用得很怪,我认为她的基本分析单位选错了。
评分历历在目。提出了有趣的问题,on what kind of internal systematic shifts at the level of discourse, ideology, social relations, and time was this paradox (人们似乎为苏联的突然解体做了充分的准备)predicted? 但是语言人类学理论用得很怪,我认为她的基本分析单位选错了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有