H L A Hart's The Concept of Law is the classic text for the study of jurisprudence and legal philosophy and is probably the most important work of legal philosophy written this century. This second edition is particularly valuable as it combines Hart's original text with a postscript, in which he responds to criticisms of his theory levelled by such notable scholars as Dworkin, Fuller and Finnis. Written by him but only discovered after his death, it has been ably edited by Joseph Raz and Penelope Bulloch of Balliol College, Oxford.
H.L.A. (Herbert) Hart (1907-1992)
was the son of a Jewish tailor of Polish and German descent. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School and New College Oxford, where he obtained a brilliant first class in Classical Greats. He practised at the Chancery Bar from 1932 to 1940 along with Richard (later Lord) Wilberforce. During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked in MI5. During this time his interests returned to philosophy and in 1945 he was appointed philosophy tutor at New College. He was strongly influenced by the linguistic philosophy then current in Oxford, but employed its techniques more constructively than did most members of the movement. In 1952, given his chancery background, he was persuaded by J.L. Austin to be a candidate for the Oxford chair of Jurisprudence when Professor Arthur Goodhart resigned. He was elected and held the chair until 1969.
From 1952 on he delivered the undergraduate lectures that turned into The Concept of Law (1961, posthumous second edition 1994). He also lectured on right and duties, but these lectures were never published. He held seminars with Tony Honoré on causation, leading to their joint work Causation in the Law (1959, second edition 1985). His visit to Harvard in 1956-7 led to his Holmes lecture on 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) and a famous controversy with Lon Fuller. Returning to the UK he engaged in an equally famous debate with Patrick (later Lord) Devlin on the limits within which the criminal law should try to enforce morality. Hart published two books on the subject, Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) and The Morality of the Criminal Law (1965). A wider interest in criminal law, stimulated by Rupert (later Professor Sir Rupert) Cross was signalled by his 'Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment' (1959). Nine of his essays on the criminal law were collected in Punishment and Responsibility (1968). In 1968 he was asked by Oxford University to chair a commission on relations with junior members, then at a low ebb, and produced a notably perceptive and constructive report.
Feeling that his powers were waning Hart resigned his chair in 1969, to be succeeded by Ronald Dworkin, a severe critic of his legal philosophy. He now devoted himself mainly to the study of Bentham, whom, along with Kelsen, he regarded as the most important legal philosopher of modern times. Ten of his essays were collected in Essays on Bentham (1982). From 1973 to 1978 he was Principal of Brasenose College. In his last years he was much concerned to find a convincing reply to Dworkin's criticisms of his version of legal positivism. A sketch of Hart's reply is to be found in the postscript to the second edition of The Concept of Law.
Hart's main aim as a lecturer and writer was to tell the truth and be clear. He was the most widely read British legal philosopher of the twentieth century and his work will continue to be a focus of discussion.
头顶金灿灿的警徽,肩扛沉甸甸的肩章,干一行,就要爱一行,更要专一行。用青春活,理想诠释人民警察誓言.
评分平装 450 Pages ISBN-10: 957667607X ISBN-13: 9789576676079 出版社: 商周文化事業股份有限公司 出版日期: Aug 01, 2000
评分头顶金灿灿的警徽,肩扛沉甸甸的肩章,干一行,就要爱一行,更要专一行。用青春活,理想诠释人民警察誓言.
评分 评分【motive在哈特三步走里的地位】fear/morality/self-interest等各种动机→→determination to obey守法的内在面向→→behavior of obedience守法的外在面向。奥斯特OBBT模型错误地将动机限缩为仅fear一种。 承认规则是法体系基础 The case for calling the rule of recognition...
去年写论文耽误了朱老师的课,这学期跟着读原著读了五六次了,虽然动机不纯,专为挑哈特的刺,但也被逻辑的力量征服,朱老师也是那种朴实无华型的学者,交流起来不嫌我水平差。 另外,哈特不可能没读过韦伯。
评分常读常新,还是原版好
评分看hart...很纠结。。。
评分去年写论文耽误了朱老师的课,这学期跟着读原著读了五六次了,虽然动机不纯,专为挑哈特的刺,但也被逻辑的力量征服,朱老师也是那种朴实无华型的学者,交流起来不嫌我水平差。 另外,哈特不可能没读过韦伯。
评分之前读过法律出版社两位台湾学者的译作,读完原版后还是发现了不少翻译中存在的问题。Zum Beispiel, 两位台湾前辈将Primary Rule和Secondary Rule分别翻译为初级规则和次级规则,相对于原生规则和次生规则的翻译,后者更加符合Pro. Hart的原意。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有