圖書標籤: Deleuze  Badiou  法國哲學  哲學  theory  Gilles_Deleuze   

喜歡 Badiou's Deleuze 的讀者還喜歡

相當忠實於德勒茲的文本，對巴迪歐提到的每一個概念進行瞭細緻的反駁，但其實都可以總結成一個關鍵誤解“virtual ≠Being”。最後也肯定瞭巴迪歐這本書的意義，“It is a fidelity to an event in thought whose unexpected grace – a grace that is as cruel as it is sweet, cruel in the measure of its sweetness – comes to overturn accepted certainties, ways of living and feeling, modes of thought.”

相當忠實於德勒茲的文本，對巴迪歐提到的每一個概念進行瞭細緻的反駁，但其實都可以總結成一個關鍵誤解“virtual ≠Being”。最後也肯定瞭巴迪歐這本書的意義，“It is a fidelity to an event in thought whose unexpected grace – a grace that is as cruel as it is sweet, cruel in the measure of its sweetness – comes to overturn accepted certainties, ways of living and feeling, modes of thought.”

相當忠實於德勒茲的文本，對巴迪歐提到的每一個概念進行瞭細緻的反駁，但其實都可以總結成一個關鍵誤解“virtual ≠Being”。最後也肯定瞭巴迪歐這本書的意義，“It is a fidelity to an event in thought whose unexpected grace – a grace that is as cruel as it is sweet, cruel in the measure of its sweetness – comes to overturn accepted certainties, ways of living and feeling, modes of thought.”

相當忠實於德勒茲的文本，對巴迪歐提到的每一個概念進行瞭細緻的反駁，但其實都可以總結成一個關鍵誤解“virtual ≠Being”。最後也肯定瞭巴迪歐這本書的意義，“It is a fidelity to an event in thought whose unexpected grace – a grace that is as cruel as it is sweet, cruel in the measure of its sweetness – comes to overturn accepted certainties, ways of living and feeling, modes of thought.”

相當忠實於德勒茲的文本，對巴迪歐提到的每一個概念進行瞭細緻的反駁，但其實都可以總結成一個關鍵誤解“virtual ≠Being”。最後也肯定瞭巴迪歐這本書的意義，“It is a fidelity to an event in thought whose unexpected grace – a grace that is as cruel as it is sweet, cruel in the measure of its sweetness – comes to overturn accepted certainties, ways of living and feeling, modes of thought.”