图书标签: 哲学 英文版 思想史 literature Theory Philosophy French Derrida
发表于2024-11-14
Thinking the Impossible pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
The late 20th century saw a remarkable flourishing of philosophy in France. The work of French philosophers is wide ranging, historically informed, often reaching out beyond the boundaries of philosophy; they are public intellectuals, taken seriously as contributors to debates outside the academy. Gary Gutting tells the story of the development of a distinctively French philosophy in the last four decades of the 20th century. His aim is to arrive at an account of what it was to 'do philosophy' in France, what this sort of philosophizing was able to achieve, and how it differs from the analytic philosophy dominant in Anglophone countries. His initial focus is on the three most important philosophers who came to prominence in the 1960s: Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, and Jacques Derrida. He sets out the educational and cultural context of their work, as a basis for a detailed treatment of how they formulated and began to carry out their philosophical projects in the 1960s and 1970s. He gives a fresh assessment of their responses to the key influences of Hegel and Heidegger, and the fraught relationship of the new generation to their father-figure Sartre. He concludes that Foucault, Derrida, and Deleuze can all be seen as developing their fundamental philosophical stances out of distinctive readings of Nietzsche. The second part of the book considers topics and philosophers that became prominent in the 1980s and 1990s, such as the revival of ethics in Levinas, Derrida, and Foucault, the return to phenomenology and its use to revive religious experience as a philosophical topic, and Alain Badiou's new ontology of the event. Finally Gutting brings to the fore the meta-philosophical theme of the book, that French philosophy since the 1960s has been primarily concerned with thinking the impossible.
Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
评分Gutting选了一个几乎不可能仅在一部著作中就能解释清楚的题目,从中又非常有野心地决定讨论法哲三巨头,并且研究黑格尔,海德格尔和尼采对三人的影响,最终导致没有深入探讨任何人物或观念。仅从其对德勒兹的研究来看,几乎完全不值得仔细阅读,没有涉及任何主要著作,也没有参考任何德勒兹学者的研究。Gutting以同样的方法研究德里达和巴丢,却提供不出新的见解。总之是一部败笔,同时也说明Gutting并不是一位严肃的哲学史家。很失望。
评分两百页的正文,覆盖的议题相当庞杂:法国教育体制对法国哲学的影响,黑格尔、海德格尔、尼采的遗产,萨特的尴尬地位,伦理转向,宗教体验的(不)可能性。Gutting长期以来沟通分析/欧陆的努力在这本书里非常明显,而在“风格的政治”已然被专题化的前提下,他对法国哲学著述方式的不满恐怕会激化而非缓和现有的分歧。Gutting想象《差异与重复》的前言被匿名提交给一位分析形而上学家评议,模仿其口吻写了一篇拒稿报告,并建议这位作者先去读一个Leiter Reports上推荐的硕士项目以便训练哲学思维。
评分两百页的正文,覆盖的议题相当庞杂:法国教育体制对法国哲学的影响,黑格尔、海德格尔、尼采的遗产,萨特的尴尬地位,伦理转向,宗教体验的(不)可能性。Gutting长期以来沟通分析/欧陆的努力在这本书里非常明显,而在“风格的政治”已然被专题化的前提下,他对法国哲学著述方式的不满恐怕会激化而非缓和现有的分歧。Gutting想象《差异与重复》的前言被匿名提交给一位分析形而上学家评议,模仿其口吻写了一篇拒稿报告,并建议这位作者先去读一个Leiter Reports上推荐的硕士项目以便训练哲学思维。
评分目录比正文丰富 系列。。。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Thinking the Impossible pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024