This volume is the first to address Foucault's influence and the potential of his work in the understanding and the writing of history. It does so critically and accessibly.
Scholars from the United States, France and Italy, including historians, sociologists, an anthropogist and a philosopher, range over Foucault's writing - on love and the family in classical antiquity, the constitution of the self, the history of science and sexuality, to the origins of the liberal state. But, true to its subject, this book does not conceive of history divorced from philosophy: it explores how Foucault's understanding of the past relates to his ideas of truth, ethics, knowledge and action. All-in-all, the book offers a series of mind-opening perspectives on Foucault's work, on the past, and on the present.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
福柯對曆史學研究，曆史學書寫的影響不言而喻。然而這本書也沒有達到introduction中所說的希望對福柯的曆史學研究方法甚至福柯的曆史主義的反思。個人興趣而言，值得一看的有第二章Foucault on sexuality in Greco-Roman Antiquity;以及最後一張problematization as a mode of reading history。
评分福柯對曆史學研究，曆史學書寫的影響不言而喻。然而這本書也沒有達到introduction中所說的希望對福柯的曆史學研究方法甚至福柯的曆史主義的反思。個人興趣而言，值得一看的有第二章Foucault on sexuality in Greco-Roman Antiquity;以及最後一張problematization as a mode of reading history。
评分福柯對曆史學研究，曆史學書寫的影響不言而喻。然而這本書也沒有達到introduction中所說的希望對福柯的曆史學研究方法甚至福柯的曆史主義的反思。個人興趣而言，值得一看的有第二章Foucault on sexuality in Greco-Roman Antiquity;以及最後一張problematization as a mode of reading history。
评分福柯對曆史學研究，曆史學書寫的影響不言而喻。然而這本書也沒有達到introduction中所說的希望對福柯的曆史學研究方法甚至福柯的曆史主義的反思。個人興趣而言，值得一看的有第二章Foucault on sexuality in Greco-Roman Antiquity;以及最後一張problematization as a mode of reading history。
评分福柯對曆史學研究，曆史學書寫的影響不言而喻。然而這本書也沒有達到introduction中所說的希望對福柯的曆史學研究方法甚至福柯的曆史主義的反思。個人興趣而言，值得一看的有第二章Foucault on sexuality in Greco-Roman Antiquity;以及最後一張problematization as a mode of reading history。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有