Richard Wolin is Distinguished Professor of History, Comparative Literature, and Political Science at the City University of New York Graduate Center. His books, which include Heidegger's Children and The Seduction of Unreason (both Princeton), have been translated into ten languages. His articles and reviews have appeared in Dissent, the Nation, and the New Republic.
Michel Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre, Julia Kristeva, Phillipe Sollers, and Jean-Luc Godard. During the 1960s, a who's who of French thinkers, writers, and artists, spurred by China's Cultural Revolution, were seized with a fascination for Maoism. Combining a merciless exposé of left-wing political folly and cross-cultural misunderstanding with a spirited defense of the 1960s, The Wind from the East tells the colorful story of this legendary period in France. Richard Wolin shows how French students and intellectuals, inspired by their perceptions of the Cultural Revolution, and motivated by utopian hopes, incited grassroots social movements and reinvigorated French civic and cultural life.
Wolin's riveting narrative reveals that Maoism's allure among France's best and brightest actually had little to do with a real understanding of Chinese politics. Instead, it paradoxically served as a vehicle for an emancipatory transformation of French society. French student leftists took up the trope of "cultural revolution," applying it to their criticisms of everyday life. Wolin examines how Maoism captured the imaginations of France's leading cultural figures, influencing Sartre's "perfect Maoist moment"; Foucault's conception of power; Sollers's chic, leftist intellectual journal Tel Quel; as well as Kristeva's book on Chinese women--which included a vigorous defense of foot-binding.
Recounting the cultural and political odyssey of French students and intellectuals in the 1960s, The Wind from the East illustrates how the Maoist phenomenon unexpectedly sparked a democratic political sea change in France.
和作者观点差异很大,四星完全是因为他对六七十年代的法国毛主义做了细致的梳理。 后面朱特的推荐语说这本书“审慎公正”,个人并不赞同。详实细致可以,但说这本书“公正”并不合适。它的情感色彩、意识形态倾向非常明显不加掩饰,我对这种写法没意见,但显然不能用“审慎公正...
評分和作者观点差异很大,四星完全是因为他对六七十年代的法国毛主义做了细致的梳理。 后面朱特的推荐语说这本书“审慎公正”,个人并不赞同。详实细致可以,但说这本书“公正”并不合适。它的情感色彩、意识形态倾向非常明显不加掩饰,我对这种写法没意见,但显然不能用“审慎公正...
評分以前看Simone Weil的评传,非常佩服:那么一个文文弱弱的虔诚天主教小姑娘,居然是个共产主义者,竟然跑到工厂当女工。 现在看这本《东边来的风》,才发现,法国的天主教+法共,远不止Weil一个人。当时名声最大的恐怕就是Althusser了。铁派法共Althusser当时请求跟教皇见面,...
評分这本书反复将共产主义和人道主义对立,比如说福柯领悟到人道主义更为重要,由此脱离左派运动等等。 这种对立貌似很有道理,但实际上法国左派运动号召知识分子进工厂做工等等,这也应当被视作某种人道主义行为吧。 我认为共产主义跟人道主义有不少重叠交叉地方。 作者假如要把两...
評分以前看Simone Weil的评传,非常佩服:那么一个文文弱弱的虔诚天主教小姑娘,居然是个共产主义者,竟然跑到工厂当女工。 现在看这本《东边来的风》,才发现,法国的天主教+法共,远不止Weil一个人。当时名声最大的恐怕就是Althusser了。铁派法共Althusser当时请求跟教皇见面,...
毛澤東思想占領法國....
评分嗯,反正讀起來還挺開心的,價值如何不知道
评分"And although the students’ aims and demands varied greatly from country to country, these worldwide political uprisings indubitably possessed something in common. But what, exactly?" And why at this time, exactly?
评分彆騙錢瞭,三星給你麵子瞭。
评分很喜歡這個的,個人非常的喜歡,推薦給大傢,真的特彆好,很喜歡!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有