Zoographies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Matthew Calarco

Columbia University Press

2008-7-4

171

GBP 18.50

Paperback

9780231140232

圖書標籤: 動物研究思想史 animal 德裏達哲學人類學動物性人與動物 Zoographies

喜歡 Zoographies 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-12-28

Zoographies epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

Zoographies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Zoographies challenges the anthropocentrism of the Continental philosophical tradition and advances the position that, while some distinctions are valid, humans and animals are best viewed as part of an ontological whole. Matthew Calarco draws on ethological and evolutionary evidence and the work of Heidegger, who called for a radicalized responsibility toward all forms of life. He also turns to Levinas, who raised questions about the nature and scope of ethics; Agamben, who held the "anthropological machine" responsible for the horrors of the twentieth century; and Derrida, who initiated a nonanthropocentric ethics. Calarco concludes with a call for the abolition of classical versions of the human-animal distinction and asks that we devise new ways of thinking about and living with animals.

Zoographies 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

Matthew Calarco is Associate Professor of Philosophy at California State University, Fullerton.

圖書目錄

Zoographies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Necessary interrogation on why Derrida insists on a radical discontinuity between human and the animals. Insistence on a non-essential, multiplying, even abyssmal difference is not just between human and the animals, but rather among all living beings, of which humans are but one example, in order to to secure that radical singularity of the Other.

評分☆☆☆☆☆

噱頭很足。從海德格爾、列維納斯、阿甘本、德裏達談動物的文章為材料做論述。可惜正文的內容幾乎是introduction的擴寫，邏輯和結論都沒有更新的內容。整個畫圈圈。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

綫條太單一瞭，想以anthropocentrism為基礎展開批判，力道又不夠

評分☆☆☆☆☆