Voting for Autocracy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Beatriz Magaloni

Cambridge University Press

2008-08-11

316

USD 24.99

Paperback

Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics

9780521736596

图书标签: 比较政治政治学拉美研究比较威权威权韧性威权主义民主转型民主化

喜欢 Voting for Autocracy 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-05-09

Voting for Autocracy epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Voting for Autocracy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

This 2006 book provides a theory of the logic of survival of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), one of the most resilient autocratic regimes in the twentieth century. An autocratic regime hid behind the facade of elections that were held with clockwise precision. Although their outcome was totally predictable, elections were not hollow rituals. The PRI made millions of ordinary citizens vest their interests in the survival of the autocratic regime. Voters could not simply 'throw the rascals out of office' because their choices were constrained by a series of strategic dilemmas that compelled them to support the autocrats. The book also explores the factors that led to the demise of the PRI. The theory sheds light on the logic of 'electoral autocracies', among the most common type of autocracy, and is the only systematic treatment in the literature today dealing with this form of autocracy.

Voting for Autocracy 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

Beatriz Magaloni is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Stanford University.

图书目录

Voting for Autocracy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

我感觉其实关于punishment regime 的部分可以拓展一下。作者似乎认为对反对派赢得选举的市政进行财政歧视是“惩罚”叛变的选民，我倒觉得其实是一个credit claiming的问题：中央的福利项目在反对派赢得选举的城市很容易被当权的反对派宣传成是自己的功绩。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

模型有点问题

评分☆☆☆☆☆

打马虎眼地算拿下了吧。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

模型有点问题

评分☆☆☆☆☆

感觉作者提供了一种颇为微妙的解释方式。做hegemonic party system的人会向做Dominant party system的取经，反之亦然。墨西哥政治的研究者竭力试图说服读者，墨西哥其实很像意大利和日本，执政党都是在选举中获胜。而日本和意大利政治的研究者则竭力劝说读者，意大利和日本很像拉美，天民党和自民党都靠pork politics过活。如果不看作者讨论的对象，开始还以为此书说的是自民党的故事。派阀和利益诱导政治。不过从日本的故事来看，讽刺地是，大概至少还是“纯”民主制更加有助于优位政党长期执政。毕竟倘若没有自民党的分裂，在野党93年之前都没有夺取政权的欲念。而93年之后他们有了这种欲念之后，经济无论好坏，自民党的席位不见得比93年之前更少。哪种讲故事的方式更有意思呢？