圖書標籤: Ackerman 美國 秩序與曆史·美 法學·公法·比較·美 哲學 【pdf已存】 sociology politics
发表于2024-11-22
We the People pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
The Civil Rights Revolution carries Bruce Ackerman’s sweeping reinterpretation of constitutional history into the era beginning with Brown v. Board of Education. From Rosa Parks’s courageous defiance, to Martin Luther King’s resounding cadences in “I Have a Dream,” to Lyndon Johnson’s leadership of Congress, to the Supreme Court’s decisions redefining the meaning of equality, the movement to end racial discrimination decisively changed our understanding of the Constitution.
Ackerman anchors his discussion in the landmark statutes of the 1960s: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. Challenging conventional legal analysis and arguing instead that constitutional politics won the day, he describes the complex interactions among branches of government—and also between government and the ordinary people who participated in the struggle. He showcases leaders such as Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, and Richard Nixon who insisted on real change, not just formal equality, for blacks and other minorities.
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. The breakthrough was the passage of laws that ended the institutionalized humiliations of Jim Crow and ensured equal rights at work, in schools, and in the voting booth. This legislation gained congressional approval only because of the mobilized support of the American people—and their principles deserve a central place in the nation’s history. Ackerman’s arguments are especially important at a time when the Roberts Court is actively undermining major achievements of America’s Second Reconstruction.
Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University.
作為全書的第三捲,阿剋曼在本書中著重闡述瞭一個觀點:憲法的概念不僅包含憲法本身,修正案,和貌似修正案其實並非按照憲法第五章通過的第十三-十五修正案(見第二捲),同樣包含重要的法案。民權法案的第七章禁止瞭就業歧視,其後又禁止瞭住房歧視。在這兩項法案中,美國人民對於憲法的理解發生瞭革命性的改變:憲法保障的“平等保護”不僅是針對國傢,同樣也在一些領域內針對個人。因此,雖然最高院並未形式上廢除1883年民權案件中宣布的“state action doctrine”,但這個doctrine其實名存實亡。對最後一個觀點,我並不完全贊同(詳見response paper)。
評分講1960年代民權運動時美國朝野互動推進的曆史,算是脈絡化分析憲法曆史的代錶作之一。語言十分流暢,用詞也不晦澀,還好、還好。
評分作為全書的第三捲,阿剋曼在本書中著重闡述瞭一個觀點:憲法的概念不僅包含憲法本身,修正案,和貌似修正案其實並非按照憲法第五章通過的第十三-十五修正案(見第二捲),同樣包含重要的法案。民權法案的第七章禁止瞭就業歧視,其後又禁止瞭住房歧視。在這兩項法案中,美國人民對於憲法的理解發生瞭革命性的改變:憲法保障的“平等保護”不僅是針對國傢,同樣也在一些領域內針對個人。因此,雖然最高院並未形式上廢除1883年民權案件中宣布的“state action doctrine”,但這個doctrine其實名存實亡。對最後一個觀點,我並不完全贊同(詳見response paper)。
評分講1960年代民權運動時美國朝野互動推進的曆史,算是脈絡化分析憲法曆史的代錶作之一。語言十分流暢,用詞也不晦澀,還好、還好。
評分作為全書的第三捲,阿剋曼在本書中著重闡述瞭一個觀點:憲法的概念不僅包含憲法本身,修正案,和貌似修正案其實並非按照憲法第五章通過的第十三-十五修正案(見第二捲),同樣包含重要的法案。民權法案的第七章禁止瞭就業歧視,其後又禁止瞭住房歧視。在這兩項法案中,美國人民對於憲法的理解發生瞭革命性的改變:憲法保障的“平等保護”不僅是針對國傢,同樣也在一些領域內針對個人。因此,雖然最高院並未形式上廢除1883年民權案件中宣布的“state action doctrine”,但這個doctrine其實名存實亡。對最後一個觀點,我並不完全贊同(詳見response paper)。
評分
評分
評分
評分
We the People pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024