Gregory Clark is professor of economics at the University of California, Davis. He is the author of A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World (Princeton).
How much of our fate is tied to the status of our parents and grandparents? How much does this influence our children? More than we wish to believe. While it has been argued that rigid class structures have eroded in favor of greater social equality, The Son Also Rises proves that movement on the social ladder has changed little over eight centuries. Using a novel technique--tracking family names over generations to measure social mobility across countries and periods--renowned economic historian Gregory Clark reveals that mobility rates are lower than conventionally estimated, do not vary across societies, and are resistant to social policies. The good news is that these patterns are driven by strong inheritance of abilities and lineage does not beget unwarranted advantage. The bad news is that much of our fate is predictable from lineage. Clark argues that since a greater part of our place in the world is predetermined, we must avoid creating winner-take-all societies.
Clark examines and compares surnames in such diverse cases as modern Sweden, fourteenth-century England, and Qing Dynasty China. He demonstrates how fate is determined by ancestry and that almost all societies--as different as the modern United States, Communist China, and modern Japan--have similarly low social mobility rates. These figures are impervious to institutions, and it takes hundreds of years for descendants to shake off the advantages and disadvantages of their ancestors. For these reasons, Clark contends that societies should act to limit the disparities in rewards between those of high and low social rank.
Challenging popular assumptions about mobility and revealing the deeply entrenched force of inherited advantage, The Son Also Rises is sure to prompt intense debate for years to come.
《儿子照常崛起》描绘的状况更加残酷,本书的观点简单说就是:家庭决定命运。通过考察超过20个社会中不同家族社会经济状况的历史变迁,克拉克得出结论:所谓社会流动几乎不存在。一个家族地位的提升或衰落不是3至4代人的事情,二一班需要10到15代。因此,克拉克估计,你出...
評分Clark这本书,我看了前面,把他的理论和方法论看完,就知道没有必要看下去了,因为剩下的案例,不管取自哪里,因为方法和理论的错误,就都没有意义了。 这本书的核心是什么?Clark说,传统测量社会流动的方法是:父母的外显性指标(比如收入、教育、资本等)和下一代的这些外显...
評分《儿子照常崛起》描绘的状况更加残酷,本书的观点简单说就是:家庭决定命运。通过考察超过20个社会中不同家族社会经济状况的历史变迁,克拉克得出结论:所谓社会流动几乎不存在。一个家族地位的提升或衰落不是3至4代人的事情,二一班需要10到15代。因此,克拉克估计,你出...
評分读此书的人一般会提到两点,第一是名字极度酷炫,第二是结论骇人听闻。对于看过Clark之前一本书的人来说,这应该很为眼熟,因为A Farewell to Alms也是借鉴海明威,而其“西方经济发展是因为富人生孩子多穷人都被饿死了”的结论也同样霸气。两者另外一个相似之处是内文同样枯燥...
評分读此书的人一般会提到两点,第一是名字极度酷炫,第二是结论骇人听闻。对于看过Clark之前一本书的人来说,这应该很为眼熟,因为A Farewell to Alms也是借鉴海明威,而其“西方经济发展是因为富人生孩子多穷人都被饿死了”的结论也同样霸气。两者另外一个相似之处是内文同样枯燥...
非常有意思的一本書,從傢族氏族角度考量瞭階級流動性,並且充分考慮到瞭基因的影響。作者觀點是社會的公平程度對代際流動並沒有我們想的那麼大,無論是在已經近乎社會主義的北歐,還是英美,中日韓印度,這個代際相關性大概都在0.75左右。意味著想徹底實現階層跨越需要十代左右的努力。而這裏麵最關鍵的因素竟然是基因,如果你想讓你的後代獲得更大的機會走入上層社會,怎麼辦?找個基因好的結婚。。
评分論點不新穎,但是論證方式對於我來說還是挺有趣的
评分原來是一本正經的基因決定論!所以孩子還是不能收養啊
评分一位研究平等的朋友力推。看完後覺得方法和結論都頗有新意,但另一麵就是有爭議吧。和目前關注的焦點不太一樣,我還是關注短期政策層麵的階層流動
评分好書是好書,不過感覺讀完之後思想認識沒有太大的提高,看來還要反復閱讀,與之相似的書還有《二十一世紀資本論》
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有