From Library Journal
While this work of literary theory, which first appeared in Japanese in 1980, concentrates on the literature and thought of the 1980s, it challenges readers to reinterpret the literature of the entire Meiji Period (1868-1926) in six discrete essays plus a forward by Frederick Jameson and materials added for the English and paperback editions. Karatani (literature, Hosei Univ.) is at his most provocative when discussing the "discovery" of landscape in painting and literature as well as of the child as a human being. In his examinations of such important Meiji writers as Soseki, Kunidida Doppo, Tayama Katai, and Tsubouchi Shoyo, he offers insightful cultural criticism of subjects such as ethnography, religion, language, and modernity in the West and East. This far-reaching and bold reconsideration of Japanese literary history can be appreciated by scholars of modern thought and literature, above all those versed in Japanese studies.
- D.E. Perushek, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Review
“Karatani Kojin’s Origins of Modern Japanese Literature (Nihon Kindai bungaku no kigen) has had a profound effect on the way we formulate the questions we ask about modern literature and culture, and that effect will no doubt be redoubled now that the work is available in a lucid (and carefully annotated) English translation. . . . Karatani’s argument is compelling, moving even, and in the end the reader comes away with a different understanding not only of modern Japanese literature but of modern Japan itself. . .”
--Stephen Snyder, The Journal of Asian Studies
具体描述
读后感
柄谷行人在《日本现代文学的起源》中提出了“倒置”这一认知模式，具体展现在的是“风景”这个现代概念的出现这一文化事件上。他认为，“风景”概念是在风景这一现象出现后才产生的，而风景现象往往从内面中被发现。如风景画则是因符合了西方的透视法这类现代认识装置，与山水...
评分“风景一旦确立之后，其起源就被忘却了。这个风景从一开始便仿佛像是存在于外部的客观之物似的。其实，毋宁说这个客观之物实在风景之中确立起来的。” 经由“透视法”而从山水变为风景，正如文学中“写实”的诞生，“自然主义”也并非是自然的。 柄谷行人在这本书里要做的，...
评分 评分《起源》的中译本越来越多，之前大陆译本都是根据柄谷88年的初版为底本译出，而定本却迟迟没有引进。定本相较于初版，柄谷的改稿幅度是非常大的，因而看到这本作为第一本《起源》定本的中文译本几乎没有犹豫就买回来了。 说实话有点失望，文中许多句子从语法构成上就读不通，比...
评分原先是导师复印的第一章，《风景的发现》，啃的是原版，很累，通读了四五遍。果真应验了智商是硬伤的话。大神的2个观点只能勉强讲出一个容易的来，将绘画中的透视法山水画导入文学批评中来阐明颠倒的问题实在是没有搞懂，便吱吱呼呼地扭捏半天没说出来。不过，通读全书后，感觉...
用户评价
妈呀，比起读中文版清晰太多了！
评分精华在1、2和6章，分别是本书两个主要面向：内面性批判和历史性溯源。“転倒”实在是非常迷人的概念，柄谷行人对结构主义语言学的批判化用提供了一个不同于德里达的视角：如果语音中心主义是西方形而上学的传统，而东亚书面文化和诗学语境下的能指/所指关系本身暗含了一个inversion（“転倒”既可以是normative也可以是performative），那么把德里达对自由能指的论述颠倒过来，我们能否得到被其批判的形而上学之外的东西？第六章前半对synchrony和diachrony的讨论和鸥外-逍遥二者辩证也有启发。
评分总有那么一类人，思想惊为天人而写法拉拉杂杂，让人讨厌（ 但还是希望我们都能读到柄谷行人君！இ௰இ
评分总有那么一类人，思想惊为天人而写法拉拉杂杂，让人讨厌（ 但还是希望我们都能读到柄谷行人君！இ௰இ
评分妈呀，比起读中文版清晰太多了！
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有