In this powerful and provocative book, Prasenjit Duara uses the case of Manchukuo, the Japanese puppet state in northeast China from 1932-1945, to explore how such antinomies as imperialism and nationalism, modernity and tradition, and governmentality and exploitation interacted in the post-World War I period. His study of Manchukuo, which had a population of 40 million and was three times the area of Japan, catalyzes a broader understanding of new global trends that characterized much of the twentieth century. Asking why Manchukuo so desperately sought to appear sovereign, Duara examines the cultural and political resources it mobilized to make claims of sovereignty. He argues that Manchukuo, as a transparently constructed "nation-state," offers a unique historical laboratory for examining the utilization and transformation of circulating global forces mediated by the "East Asian modern." Sovereignty and AUthenticity not only shows how Manchukuo drew technologies of modern nationbuilding from China and Japan, but it provides a window into how some of these techniques and processes were obscured or naturalized in the more successful East Asian nation-states. With its sweepingly original theoretical and comparative perspectives on nationalism and imperialism, this book will be essential reading for all those interested in contemporary history.
具體描述
讀後感
杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注：一个民族-国家的建构，可能是成功的，也可能是失败的（如本书所讲的满洲国）。建构成功，需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力，并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”，否则，现实一变，建构所得，无论再精妙，都会分崩离析。在外...
評分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注：一个民族-国家的建构，可能是成功的，也可能是失败的（如本书所讲的满洲国）。建构成功，需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力，并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”，否则，现实一变，建构所得，无论再精妙，都会分崩离析。在外...
評分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注：一个民族-国家的建构，可能是成功的，也可能是失败的（如本书所讲的满洲国）。建构成功，需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力，并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”，否则，现实一变，建构所得，无论再精妙，都会分崩离析。在外...
評分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注：一个民族-国家的建构，可能是成功的，也可能是失败的（如本书所讲的满洲国）。建构成功，需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力，并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”，否则，现实一变，建构所得，无论再精妙，都会分崩离析。在外...
評分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注：一个民族-国家的建构，可能是成功的，也可能是失败的（如本书所讲的满洲国）。建构成功，需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力，并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”，否则，现实一变，建构所得，无论再精妙，都会分崩离析。在外...
用戶評價
閱於2012-2015
评分Besides empire-building, what attracts me most is the transcendence of the redemptive societies under the control of that nightmare puppet empire. For them, the Way is the only final target. The regime could ONLY be a tool, or even worse, a stage.
评分做 presentation 時的迴憶，隻記得肚肚同學的滿洲國護照瞭。。
评分In East Asian modernity, the relationship between both cultural and spatial authenticity and sovereignty was manifested by the transformation of “globally circulating concepts and practices of governmentality and fascistic mobilization, nationality, civilization and womanhood, indigeneity and nativism” into “immanent traditions.”
评分清晰有力而啓迪性強的理論框架，但史料收集和處理上則有欠缺（最後一章幾乎就是文學研究）。滿洲國隻是個引子，（西、日、中三角間的）“東亞現代”纔是理論目標所在。抓住幾條綫索：（1）帝國主義與民族主義的共生、分離、糾纏，以及日本帝國主義（還有其泛亞主義）在二十世紀初東亞的具體情勢（造成瞭滿洲國為何被作為民族國傢來建立？）；（2）主權民族國傢作為“global culture”與西方文明階序話語的轉變和殘留，state building（理性化、治理性、知識／權力等等）和nation formation（本質性、精神性、超越性、情感性）的緊張中的authenticity如何構建病支持主權claim。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有