In this powerful and provocative book, Prasenjit Duara uses the case of Manchukuo, the Japanese puppet state in northeast China from 1932-1945, to explore how such antinomies as imperialism and nationalism, modernity and tradition, and governmentality and exploitation interacted in the post-World War I period. His study of Manchukuo, which had a population of 40 million and was three times the area of Japan, catalyzes a broader understanding of new global trends that characterized much of the twentieth century. Asking why Manchukuo so desperately sought to appear sovereign, Duara examines the cultural and political resources it mobilized to make claims of sovereignty. He argues that Manchukuo, as a transparently constructed "nation-state," offers a unique historical laboratory for examining the utilization and transformation of circulating global forces mediated by the "East Asian modern." Sovereignty and AUthenticity not only shows how Manchukuo drew technologies of modern nationbuilding from China and Japan, but it provides a window into how some of these techniques and processes were obscured or naturalized in the more successful East Asian nation-states. With its sweepingly original theoretical and comparative perspectives on nationalism and imperialism, this book will be essential reading for all those interested in contemporary history.
杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
评分杜赞奇的这个研究方向值得关注:一个民族-国家的建构,可能是成功的,也可能是失败的(如本书所讲的满洲国)。建构成功,需要在民族、文化、历史、语言、风俗等方面的努力,并且要善于运用一切有效的“国族想象力”,否则,现实一变,建构所得,无论再精妙,都会分崩离析。在外...
what can I really get apart from the argument??? (每次阅读杜赞奇之后的疑问(可能还是我蠢
评分做 presentation 时的回忆,只记得肚肚同学的满洲国护照了。。
评分清晰有力而启迪性强的理论框架,但史料收集和处理上则有欠缺(最后一章几乎就是文学研究)。满洲国只是个引子,(西、日、中三角间的)“东亚现代”才是理论目标所在。抓住几条线索:(1)帝国主义与民族主义的共生、分离、纠缠,以及日本帝国主义(还有其泛亚主义)在二十世纪初东亚的具体情势(造成了满洲国为何被作为民族国家来建立?);(2)主权民族国家作为“global culture”与西方文明阶序话语的转变和残留,state building(理性化、治理性、知识/权力等等)和nation formation(本质性、精神性、超越性、情感性)的紧张中的authenticity如何构建病支持主权claim。
评分欲罢不能
评分In East Asian modernity, the relationship between both cultural and spatial authenticity and sovereignty was manifested by the transformation of “globally circulating concepts and practices of governmentality and fascistic mobilization, nationality, civilization and womanhood, indigeneity and nativism” into “immanent traditions.”
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈图书下载中心 版权所有