The Chomsky-Foucault Debate

The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.

John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.

出版者:New Press, The
作者:Noam Chomsky
出品人:
頁數:213
译者:
出版時間:2006-9-1
價格:USD 15.95
裝幀:Paperback
isbn號碼:9781595581341
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • Chomsky 
  • Foucault 
  • 哲學 
  • 福柯 
  • 語言學 
  • 社會理論 
  • 喬姆斯基 
  • 思想 
  •  
想要找書就要到 小哈圖書下載中心
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.

In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?

The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.

In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.

具體描述

讀後感

評分

名学者的对话或者论辩,一向容易引起人的兴趣,因是思想的交锋,大师的对弈,无须第三者来阐释双方,直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会,四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论,听者之众,传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...  

評分

看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书,谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价,原书见第六章,p266&p268: 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少,大概很少很少,但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家(可能因为我们同一天生日,他就在我心里比较特别,哈哈);在...  

評分

名学者的对话或者论辩,一向容易引起人的兴趣,因是思想的交锋,大师的对弈,无须第三者来阐释双方,直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会,四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论,听者之众,传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...  

評分

看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书,谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价,原书见第六章,p266&p268: 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少,大概很少很少,但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家(可能因为我们同一天生日,他就在我心里比较特别,哈哈);在...  

評分

1、民主社会的理想是好人的理想还是所有人的理想?2、现实在理论面前是狭隘的,还是理论在现实面前是狭隘的?3、哲学理想更漫无边际,还是政治理想更漫无边际?4、战争是人性的悲剧,却是历史的重要环节。5、看来中国的大同社会还太不为欧洲人所了解。最美好,也最接近现实的最...

用戶評價

评分

20世紀前半葉結構語言學成為顯學 喬姆斯基以其為靶子 而當結構主義擴散後 福柯以之為武器批判科技史中的主觀導嚮。所以二人都是對的 人類現象就是充滿綫索而又無法預測

评分

Plato和Aristotle永遠在辯論:上一個時代他們的化名是Chomsky和Foucault,在更久遠的過去他們曾自稱Bernard Shaw和G.K.Chesterton。而我總是傾嚮於支持後者。

评分

The Foucault-Chomsky Debate on Human Nature

评分

這兩個人,相當的萌啊。還有Said,你是不是Foucault的Fan啊~~= =||||

评分

原來這個我沒有標過(。

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有